math.MGMay 11, 2026

The Observable Wasserstein Distance

Authors: Edivaldo Lopes dos SantosLeandro Vicente MauriWashington MioTom Needham

Organizations: 1Departamento de Matem´atica, Universidade Federal de S˜ao Carlos, Brazil · Department of Mathematics, Florida State University, USA

Abstract

We introduce the observable Wasserstein distance, a framework for deriving lower bounds on the Wasserstein distance between probability measures on Polish metric spaces, designed to bypass the computational intractability of exact optimal transport in large-scale, non-Euclidean datasets. Analogous to the sliced Wasserstein distance in Rd\mathbb{R}^d, our approach projects measures onto the real line via 1-Lipschitz observables and computes the Wasserstein distances between the resulting pushforward distributions. We define a hierarchy of pseudo-metrics by restricting observables to a nested chain of subspaces. A central theoretical contribution is an injectivity result linking the metric covering dimension of the support of a measure to the specific order in the hierarchy that guarantees unique recovery. This serves as a metric-space analogue to the Cramér-Wold Device for Euclidean distributions. We demonstrate that this hierarchy offers a tunable trade-off between sharpness as a lower bound on the Wasserstein distance and computational efficiency. We also present a discrete computational model for finite grids and numerical experiments validating the efficacy and utility of these approximations.

Explore similar work

May 19, 2026stat.ML

Optimizing Computational-Statistical Runtime for Wasserstein Distance Estimation

Squared Wasserstein distance is a frequently used tool to measure discrepancy between probability distributions. This distance is typically computed between empirical measures of size nn from two underlying random samples. Unfortunately, even in lower dimensional Euclidean space problems (d{2,3})\left( d \in \{2,3\} \right), algorithms for Wasserstein distance computation with approximate or exact precision guarantees scale poorly in the runtime as a function of nn and the desired precision. In response, we consider the computational-statistical runtime, where the goal is to estimate from samples the Wasserstein distance between potentially smooth measures up to εε-additive error in expectation with respect to the sampling; we allow O(1)O(1) computational cost for collecting a sample. Towards this, we develop a Sample-Sketch-Solve paradigm where we introduce a regular cartesian grid sketch of the samples. We show that (especially under αα-Hölder smooth distributions) this can compress the data without increasing asymptotic error, and also regularizes the structure which enables faster exact algorithms. Ultimately, we approximate W22(P,Q)W_2^2(P,Q) within εε error in εmax(2,d+1+o(1)1+α)ε^{-\max(2,\frac{d+1+o(1)}{1+α})} time for 0<α<10 < α< 1 Hölder smooth distributions P,QP,Q on (0,1)d(0,1)^{d}; an optimal Θ(ε2)Θ(ε^{-2}) for α>1/2α> 1/2 when d=2d=2 and nearly optimal as α1α\to 1 when d=3d = 3.
Peter Matthew Jacobs, Jeff M. Phillips
May 14, 2026cs.LG

Distance-Matrix Wasserstein Statistics for Scalable Gromov--Wasserstein Learning

Gromov--Wasserstein (GW) distances compare graphs, shapes, and point clouds through internal distances, without requiring a common coordinate system. This invariance is powerful, but discrete GW is a nonconvex quadratic optimal transport problem and is difficult to estimate at scale. We propose \emph{Distance-Matrix Wasserstein} (DMW), a hierarchy of Wasserstein statistics comparing laws of random finite distance matrices. Rather than optimizing a global point-level alignment, DMW samples nn points from each space, records their pairwise distances, and transports the resulting matrix laws. We prove that DMW is a relaxation and lower bound of GW, and establish a reverse approximation inequality: the GW--DMW gap is controlled by the Wasserstein error of approximating each original measure with nn samples. Hence population DMW converges to GW as sampled subspaces become dense. We further give finite-sample bounds, including intrinsic-dimensional rates that depend on the data manifold rather than the ambient matrix dimension (n2)\binom n2. For scalable computation, we introduce sliced and multi-scale DMW; for p=1p=1, the sliced multi-scale dissimilarity yields positive-definite exponential kernels. Experiments on synthetic metric spaces, scalability benchmarks, graph classification, and two-sample testing validate the theory and demonstrate an interpretable GW-style proxy for structural comparison.
Ao Xu, Tieru Wu
Oct 13, 2023stat.ML

Structured Approximations of Measures

We study the approximation of probability measures in the Wasserstein-pp distance by structured classes of approximators, motivated by applications in imaging, machine learning, and physical measurement under sensor constraints. We obtain three sets of results. First, for measures with densities bounded away from zero on a bounded Lipschitz domain ΩΩ, we prove that any approximation scheme for functions in Lp(Ω)\mathrm{L}_p(Ω) transfers, with linear rate, to a corresponding approximation scheme for measures in Wp(Ω)\mathrm{W}_p(Ω). The argument applies a theorem of Bogovskii on regularity of solutions to the continuity equation in the Benamou-Brenier formulation of optimal transport. We exhibit concrete approximation schemes (polynomials, shift-invariant spaces, cardinal interpolation with radial basis functions, kernel density estimators, and piecewise approximations on nonuniform Voronoi partitions) that fit the framework. As a matter of independent interest, we prove a negative Sobolev lower bound that generalizes existing bounds from p=2p=2 to all p(1,)p\in(1,\infty). We also consider deterministic bounds for discrete approximations to arbitrary measures in terms of the mesh norm of a quasi-uniform set of points. We specialize these bounds to show that compactly supported measures admit a deterministic NN-term approximation μNμ_N such that Wp(μ,μN)=O(N1d)\mathrm{W}_p(μ,μ_N) = O(N^{-\frac{1}{d}}) for all d1d\geq 1, which matches the asymptotic optimal quantizer rate. We also extend these results to non-compactly supported measures with appropriate tail decay.
Keaton Hamm, Varun Khurana