ProteinOPD: Towards Effective and Efficient Preference Alignment for Protein Design
Authors: Yulin Zhang, He Cao, Zihao Jiang, Chenyi Zi, Zhipeng Zhou, Zijing Liu, Yu Li, Jia Li, +1 more
Organizations: Tsinghua University · International Digital Economy Academy · Hong Kong University of2026 Science and Technology (Guangzhou) · Nanyang Technological University
Abstract
Designing proteins with desired functions or properties represents a core goal in synthetic biology and drug discovery. Recent advances in protein language models (PLMs) have enabled the generation of highly designable protein sequences, while preference alignment provides a promising way to steer designs toward desired functions and properties. Nevertheless, they often trigger catastrophic forgetting of pretrained knowledge, degrading basic designability and failing to balance multiple competing objectives. To address these issues, we draw inspiration from On-Policy Distillation (OPD), an advanced post-training method renowned for mitigating catastrophic forgetting through its mode-seeking nature. In this work, we propose ProteinOPD, a multi-objective preference alignment framework that can effectively balance multiple preference objectives while maintaining the inherent designability of PLMs. ProteinOPD adapts a pretrained PLM into preference-specific teachers and distills their knowledge into a shared student via token-level OPD on the student's own trajectories. During this process, the student is aligned to a unique normalized geometric consensus of weighted teachers while ensuring bounded optimization under conflicts. This bridges the gap for OPD in multi-objective/teacher alignment. Extensive experiments show that ProteinOPD achieves substantial gains on target preference objectives without compromising the designability, with an 8x training speedup over RL-based alignment competitors.
Protein language models (PLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for controllable biomolecular design, yet their post-training adaptation typically relies on costly wet-lab validation or curated preference datasets. To overcome this supervision bottleneck, we introduce unsupervised reward optimization of PLMs, a comprehensive framework for steerable protein generation without ground-truth labels. Our key insight is that task-agnostic rewards, which combine intrinsic model uncertainty with extrinsic semantic consistency informed by protein representation models, exhibit strong correlation with controllability measures across base models and temperature regimes. Building upon this discovery, we propose two offline algorithms: Soft Reward Optimization (SRO) and Binarized Reward Optimization (BRO), which effectively maximize the classical RLHF objective induced by these proxy rewards. Extensive experiments on compositional out-of-distribution prompts demonstrate that both methods significantly outperform competitive baselines (DPO, KTO), while approaching oracle performance across multiple sampling temperatures, model scales and protein families. Moreover, PLMs fine-tuned with unsupervised rewards can achieve consistently higher coverage compared to their base model in pass@k evaluations. By enabling self-improvement of PLMs through their own generated experience, our framework provides a scalable pathway toward controllable biomolecular design in settings where labeled preferences or experimental feedback are scarce or unavailable.
Protein language models (PLMs) are passive oracles: they generate sequences in a single forward pass with no mechanism to consult external biophysical feedback or redirect generation when a candidate violates thermodynamic or structural constraints. We introduce AgentPLM, which addresses this by equipping a pre-trained PLM with i) Reasoning-Augmented Decoding (RAD), which interleaves autoregressive generation with tool calls (ESMFold, FoldX, AutoDock Vina), and ii) Contrastive Agent Policy Optimisation (CAPO), a trajectory-level extension of direct preference optimisation that trains the policy end-to-end to learn when oracle feedback is informative rather than merely imitating high-fitness sequences. We evaluate AgentPLM on benchmark tasks spanning de novo enzyme design, antibody optimisation, thermostability, PPI interface design, and zero-shot fitness prediction with standardised oracle APIs and controlled sequence-identity splits. AgentPLM achieves state-of-the-art results with a gain in antibody top-10% hit rate over the strongest passive baseline, providing mechanistic evidence of online error correction without explicit backtracking.
Aligning language models with human preferences often requires optimising multiple behavioural objectives. A practical approach is to apply these objectives sequentially using preference optimisation methods such as Direct Preference Optimisation (DPO), but it remains unclear whether later training uniformly degrades preferences learned earlier or whether the effect depends on the relationship between objectives. We study sequential DPO across four preference settings covering distributional conflict, multi-attribute interaction, strong safety signal, and compatible response-quality objectives. Using Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct with LoRA adapters, we evaluate all objectives after every stage with a fixed base-model reference. We find that sequential DPO does not produce a single forgetting pattern; preference change ranges from partial degradation to stability, pair-level redistribution, or positive transfer depending on objective relationship, signal strength, and training order. Pair-level analysis using length-normalised policy margins shows that aggregate metrics can mask heterogeneous changes across preference pairs, whereas quartile decomposition reveals that high-confidence pairs can either degrade or improve depending on the setting. Mechanistic diagnostics show that Stage~2 gradients and adapter updates are near-orthogonal to the previous objective across all settings, providing little evidence that direct gradient opposition is the primary driver. These findings suggest that future sequential alignment pipelines should account for objective compatibility and signal strength, rather than assuming that later objectives affect earlier preferences uniformly.