AESOP: Adversarial Execution-path Selection to Overload Deep Learning Pipelines

Cost-aware routing dynamically dispatches user queries to models of varying capability to balance performance and inference cost. However, the routing strategy introduces a new security concern that adversaries may manipulate the router to consistently select expensive high-capability models. Existing routing attacks depend on either white-box access or heuristic prompts, rendering them ineffective in real-world black-box scenarios. In this work, we propose R$^2$A, which aims to mislead black-box LLM routers to expensive models via adversarial suffix optimization. Specifically, R$^2$A deploys a hybrid ensemble surrogate router to mimic the black-box router. A suffix optimization algorithm is further adapted for the ensemble-based surrogate. Extensive experiments on multiple open-source and commercial routing systems demonstrate that {R$^2$A} significantly increases the routing rate to expensive models on queries of different distributions. Code and examples: https://github.com/thcxiker/R2A-Attack.

Inference systems increasingly combine a fast path that returns predictions within the application's latency deadline together with a higher-accuracy slow path that runs higher-compute methods on stronger, remote hardware, so its results can be returned on time and combined with the fast path predictions. Across several application domains, we abstract this inference architecture as a fast path, a slow path, and a coordination layer with two functions: a router that invokes the slow path and a merger that decides whether to incorporate its returned predictions. In this work, we show that this new coordination layer exposes a new attack surface: shaped workload attacks, e.g., Yo-Yo bursts, can exploit contention at shared resources along the slow path to push benign users' slow-path predictions past their latency deadlines. The merger then discards those predictions, while the fast path continues to return timely outputs. We refer to the resulting loss of slow-path accuracy benefits as accuracy collapse. We demonstrate accuracy collapse in a two-tier edge-cloud multi-object tracking pipeline in autonomous driving. In simulation, approximately 4,000 burst-shaped requests increase benign p99 latency from 92ms to 2s, nearly eliminating the benefit of the slow path's cloud inference, reducing object tracking quality by 7.0 HOTA points on average. We further find that accuracy degradation can significantly vary (2.0-18.7 HOTA points), depending on the video intervals that are targeted in the attack, and that certain rare classes (e.g., stop signs) lose nearly half of their pre-attack prediction accuracy. These results show that workload attacks can degrade prediction quality without needing either access to model weights or victim data, and motivate research on attacks and defenses for routing, merging, scheduling, and resource isolation in these emerging inference pipeline architectures.

Vision Transformers (ViTs) increasingly rely on input-adaptive inference, such as token pruning and early halting, to meet energy and latency budgets. This survey examines a recent class of adversarial efficiency degradation attacks that target these mechanisms to increase computation without necessarily degrading accuracy. We unify and compare two representative attacks, SlowFormer (a universal adversarial patch) and DeSparsify (per-image perturbations), across three popular token-pruning frameworks: A-ViT, ATS, and AdaViT. We standardize reporting using GFLOPs, accuracy loss, and an Attack Success (AS) metric that measures how much of the model's compute savings the attack takes away. Understanding these attacks is crucial for designing countermeasures that not only mitigate risk but also remain lightweight, since deployment often occurs in low-power settings such as mobile or embedded devices. To organize our analysis, we focus on three questions: how input-adaptive optimizations (e.g., token pruning and early halting) create attack surfaces for efficiency degradation; how such attacks operate in practice and which optimizations are most vulnerable; and which defenses exist today and whether they meaningfully restore efficiency under attack.