The Semantic Training Gap: Ontology-Grounded Tool Architectures for Industrial AI Agent Systems

LLarge language model (LLM)-based AI agents deployed in manufacturing environments require populated, schema-correct data for validation, yet production MES data is proprietary, privacy-encumbered, and vendor-specific. This paper introduces the Template-as-Ontology principle: a single Python configuration module (700-770 lines, 45 validated exports) serves simultaneously as the specification for a time-stepped manufacturing simulator and as the runtime domain schema for AI analytics tools, producing alignment by construction rather than integration. We formally define the domain template as a typed relational configuration schema and prove that structural alignment between simulation and tool layers is guaranteed by single-source consumption. A five-layer pipeline--simulation, PostgreSQL, CDC/Iceberg lakehouse, star schema, and 12 parameterized AI tools--generates causally coherent, MES-shaped data spanning 66 entity types across four operational domains mapped to ISA-95/IEC 62264. We validate the architecture with six industry templates (aerospace, pharma, automotive, electronics, beverages, warehousing) running on identical framework code. Calibration experiments (60 runs, 10 seeds per template) confirm parametric controllability: observed KPIs fall within configured ranges across all templates. A controlled hallucination experiment (72 tool invocations, Qwen3-32B) demonstrates that ontology-constrained parameters eliminate tool-parameter fabrication (0% constrained vs. 43% unconstrained hallucination rate for the evaluated model, Fisher's exact test p < 10^-12); the 0% constrained rate is an architectural guarantee that holds for any model. The framework provides a reusable data layer for discrete manufacturing AI validation.

Pre-deployment verification of enterprise artificial intelligence (AI) agents remains a critical gap between large language model (LLM) capability benchmarking and production deployment. Post-deployment monitoring, human-in-the-loop controls, and prompt-level guardrails offer limited assurance once an agent is operating in production. We present an ontology-grounded verification framework -- to our knowledge the first to combine three components: an Agent Operational Envelope formalizing the certification space across permissions, domain constraints, safety properties, governance rules, and autonomy levels; an ontology-to-scenario generation pipeline that derives regulatory, operational, and adversarial test scenarios automatically; and a machine-verifiable Trust Certificate with graduated deployment verdicts. A controlled pilot across four regulated industries (Fintech, Banking, Insurance, Healthcare), instantiated as five industry-by-regulatory-regime cells across the United States and Vietnam (where Vietnam's 2025 AI Law makes such verification legally mandated for financial services), generated 1,800 scenarios evaluated against 125 primary-source regulatory requirements and 25 injected faults. Ontology-grounded generation significantly outperformed the dominant persona-based baseline on regulatory coverage (48.3% versus 33.1%; corrected p_c = .0006) and attained the highest domain specificity (4.77/5.0; p = 2e-6); transparently, its advantage over plain and retrieval-augmented prompting did not survive Bonferroni correction. Cross-validation across three LLM families (Claude Sonnet 4, Qwen 2.5 72B, Gemma 4 26B; 5,400 total scenarios) replicated the persona-versus-ontology pattern. The framework offers a reproducible, regulation-grounded route to pre-deployment assurance for enterprise AI agents, complementing runtime governance with an auditable deployment gate.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents that reason, use tools, and act over multiple steps. Yet most hallucination benchmarks still evaluate only the final output, missing failures that originate in intermediate Thought-Action-Observation steps. We present Trajel, a dataset and evaluation framework for auditing trajectory-level hallucinations in multi-agent industrial workflows. Trajel introduces a five-type hallucination taxonomy (factual, referential, logical, procedural, and scope-based) over expert-annotated agent traces from AssetOpsBench. We benchmark supervised detection models at the subtask, trajectory, and long-context levels. Our results show that the most common failure modes are missed by existing benchmarks, that nearly half of hallucinated trajectories involve multiple types at once, and that automated detectors with high binary accuracy still misclassify the subtlest types. Trajectory-aware detection significantly outperforms standard post-hoc verification, making taxonomy-grounded evaluation necessary for safer agentic deployment.