PresentAgent-2: Towards Generalist Multimodal Presentation Agents

Existing works typically focus on presentation generation under isolated input settings, whereas real-world use cases span diverse scenarios, including vague user prompts, long documents, multimodal materials, and multiple heterogeneous sources. Moreover, current evaluations are often insufficiently scenario-specific. They mainly rely on generic presentation-quality criteria, such as visual appeal, layout quality, and overall coherence, but fail to assess the core capabilities required by different input settings, including grounded compression, visual-text alignment, and cross-source synthesis. Consequently, the field lacks a unified benchmark and a scenario-aware evaluation framework for faithfully diagnosing presentation-generation systems across diverse real-world settings. We present UniPPTBench, a unified benchmark for presentation generation across four representative input settings: vague-prompt, long-document, multimodal-document, and multi-source generation. We further introduce UniPPTEval, a scenario-aware evaluation protocol that combines shared metrics for cross-setting comparison with scenario-specific metrics tailored to the core requirements of each setting. We also provide transparent reference baselines to support reproducible comparison. Experiments on UniPPTBench reveal substantial performance variation across settings and recurring failure modes in content grounding, multimodal integration, and cross-source synthesis. In particular, strong performance on generic presentation-quality metrics does not necessarily imply strong task fulfillment in grounded scenarios. Together, UniPPTBench and UniPPTEval provide a faithful and diagnostic foundation for evaluating presentation generation across diverse real-world scenarios. Code and data will be publicly available.

Agentic presentation generation must preserve source content, maintain coherent visual design, render specialized objects, and produce usable artifacts. Existing systems meet only part of this requirement: templates preserve regularity but restrict adaptation, whereas free-form HTML or SVG gives models flexibility at the cost of low-level rendering decisions. This mismatch makes long technical decks brittle, especially when slides contain formulas, code, or data graphics. We present SeaSlides, an agentic slide-generation framework built around a semantic abstraction layer. Rather than authoring coordinates, inline styles, or raw SVG geometry, the model writes structured slide content through reusable components and capability modules, while templates own layout, style, and rendering. We instantiate this principle separately in HTML and Typst: SeaSlides-HTML uses template-defined DOM components, whereas SeaSlides-Typst uses template functions and package-backed modules. Capability modules route equations, code, and charts to dedicated renderers, and three feedback stages localize build errors, project-constraint violations, and visual defects before export. The two systems retain backend-specific syntax and contracts while sharing the same authoring boundary. For evaluation, we combine the 128-task UltraPresent validation setting with SeaSlidesBench-Rich, a new 32-task benchmark stressing mathematics, code, pseudocode, tables, charts, and diagrams. Across four generation models, both SeaSlides backends produce more readable, content-oriented source than SVG-heavy generation. A SeaSlides backend attains the highest rich-content macro-average under three of the four models while maintaining competitive overall qualitative performance. These results support semantic abstraction as a practical authoring principle across presentation backends.

Automatic academic paper-to-slide generation is inherently iterative, because creating an effective presentation requires repeated cycles of generation, critique, and revision. Recent multi-agent systems partially acknowledge this through internal critique-and-revise loops, while conversational approaches allow users to refine generated slide decks through dialog. However, these refinement processes either remain largely closed to the user or introduce feedback only after a complete deck has been produced, limiting the user's ability to participate in the iterative refinement of narrative flow, content allocation, and presentation emphasis. To address this gap, we introduce ConvDeck, a multi-agent pipeline for conversational paper-to-slide generation that distributes interaction across the pipeline through stage-specific loops, allowing users to iteratively refine both the presentation outline and the final slide deck at the stages where each kind of decision is made. These loops are driven by a refinement mechanism in which agents can think, speak, and act, enabling them to either directly apply edits or respond conversationally to clarify user feedback and discuss revision options. Our evaluation shows that stage-specific conversational feedback improves user-goal satisfaction while preserving narrative coherence, content quality, and visual presentation.