math.STMay 12, 2026

A proximal gradient algorithm for composite log-concave sampling

Authors: Linghai LiuSinho Chewi

Organizations: Yale University

Abstract

We propose an algorithm to sample from composite log-concave distributions over Rd\mathbb{R}^d, i.e., densities of the form πefgπ\propto e^{-f-g}, assuming access to gradient evaluations of ff and a restricted Gaussian oracle (RGO) for gg. The latter requirement means that we can easily sample from the density RGOg,h,y(x)exp(g(x)12hyx2)\text{RGO}_{g,h,y}(x) \propto \exp(-g(x) -\frac{1}{2h}||y-x||^2), which is the sampling analogue of the proximal operator for gg. If f+gf + g is αα-strongly convex and ff is ββ-smooth, our sampler achieves ε\varepsilon error in total variation distance in O~(κdlog4(1/ε))\widetilde{\mathcal O}(κ\sqrt d \log^4(1/\varepsilon)) iterations where κ:=β/ακ:= β/α, which matches prior state-of-the-art results for the case g=0g=0. We further extend our results to cases where (1) ππ is non-log-concave but satisfies a Poincaré or log-Sobolev inequality, and (2) ff is non-smooth but Lipschitz.

Explore similar work

May 15, 2026cs.DS

Complexity of Non-Log-Concave Sampling in Fisher Information

We study the query complexity of obtaining a relative Fisher information guarantee for sampling from a log-smooth non-log-concave distribution; this is a sampling analog of finding an approximate stationary point in optimization. Our algorithm is based on the proximal sampler, which is an implicit discretization of the Langevin diffusion, and requires an implementation of the backward step known as the restricted Gaussian oracle (RGO). We show that by leveraging the recent results for log-concave sampling with high-accuracy guarantees in Rényi divergence, we can obtain an approximate RGO implementation that -- when used with the proximal sampler -- yields a complexity guarantee in relative Fisher information that inherits the same dimension dependence as log-concave sampling, and improves upon prior work for non-log-concave sampling. We also show a converse reduction that any improvement in the dimension dependence in relative Fisher information for non-log-concave sampling will yield an improved dimension dependence for high-accuracy log-concave sampling.
Sinho Chewi, Andre Wibisono
Sep 14, 2026math.ST

Tight Sampling Complexity with stochastic gradient oracles in Fixed Dimensions

We investigate the stochastic-gradient query complexity of sampling smooth strongly log-concave distributions in any fixed Euclidean dimension. The potential is μ\mu-strongly convex and LL-smooth, with an unknown mode in the ball of radius μ1/2\mu^{-1/2} about the origin. We have access to unbiased stochastic oracles with the variance at most σ2\sigma^2. For every σ20\sigma^2\ge0 and total variation (TV) accuracy 0<ε1/100<\varepsilon\le1/10, we prove that the tight complexity of sampling a distribution within ϵ\epsilon-TV distance from the target distribution is NTV=Θ ⁣(log(1+κ)+σ2μϵ),N^\star_{\text{TV}}=\Theta\!\left(\log(1+\kappa)+ \frac{\sigma^2}{\mu\epsilon}\right), where κ:=Lμ\kappa:=\frac L\mu is the condition number. Note that this complexity bound is simultaneously tight for the condition number κ\kappa and accuracy ϵ\epsilon. Besides, our tight complexity bound is adaptive to noiseless setting σ=0\sigma=0, which is NTV=Θ ⁣(log(1+κ)) N^\star_{\text{TV}}=\Theta\!\left(\log(1+\kappa)\right).
Weiming Ou, Xiao Wang
Jun 10, 2026cs.DS

A unified complexity bound for logconcave sampling

We give a simple, unified, and nearly tight bound for sampling arbitrary logconcave distributions from a warm start using the In-and-Out algorithm along with exponential lifting. The main new ingredient in the analysis is an improved bound on the Poincaré constant of a lifted distribution. As a consequence, the resulting convergence rate is nearly tight for both constrained settings (e.g., Gaussian restricted to a convex body) and well-conditioned settings (e.g., strongly logconcave and smooth densities).
Yunbum Kook, Santosh S. Vempala