cs.LGMay 12, 2026

High-arity Sample Compression

Authors: Leonardo N. CoreglianoWilliam Opich

Abstract

Recently, a series of works have started studying variations of concepts from learning theory for product spaces, which can be collected under the name high-arity learning theory. In this work, we consider a high-arity variant of sample compression schemes and we prove that the existence of a high-arity sample compression scheme of non-trivial quality implies high-arity PAC learnability.

Explore similar work

May 13, 2026stat.ML

What is Learnable in Valiant's Theory of the Learnable?

Valiant's 1984 paper is widely credited with introducing the PAC learning model, but it, in fact, introduced a different model: unlike PAC learning, the learner receives only positives, may issue membership queries, and must output a hypothesis with no false positives. Prior work characterized variants, including the case without queries. We revisit Valiant's original model and ask: Which classes are learnable in it? For every finite domain, including Valiant's Boolean-hypercube setting, we show that a class is learnable if and only if every realizable positive sample can be certified by a poly-size adaptive query-compression scheme. This is a new variant of sample compression where the learner certifies samples via a short interaction with the membership oracle. Our characterization shows that learnability in Valiant's model is strictly sandwiched between learnability in the PAC model and the variant of Valiant's model without membership queries. This is one of the rare cases where introducing membership queries changes the set of learnable classes, and not just the sample or computational complexity. Next, we study the natural extension of the model to arbitrary domains. While we do not obtain an exact characterization, our techniques readily generalize and show that the same strict sandwiching persists. Finally, we show that dd-dimensional halfspaces, which are not learnable without queries, are learnable with queries: we give a poly(d)O~(1/ε)\mathrm{poly}(d) \tilde{O}(1/ε) sample and poly(d)polylog(1/ε)\mathrm{poly}(d) \mathrm{polylog}(1/ε) query algorithm, and prove that at least Ω(d)Ω(d) samples or queries are necessary. To our knowledge, this is the first algorithm for halfspaces in Valiant's model. Together, these results uncover a surprisingly rich theory behind Valiant's original notion of learnability and introduce ideas that may be of independent interest in learning theory.
Steve Hanneke, Anay Mehrotra, Grigoris Velegkas +1
Jul 8, 2026cs.LG

The Optimal Sample Complexity of Learning Autoregressive Chain-of-Thought

We prove that, in the realizable PAC setting, the sample complexity of exact-trace learning for full autoregressive Chain-of-Thought traces is upper bounded by the standard multiclass rate of the local next-token class, where this rate is governed by the Daniely--Shalev-Shwartz dimension. Under exact-trace loss, one wrong action makes the whole trace incorrect; nevertheless, for every stopping rule halt\mathtt{halt} and every pointwise halt\mathtt{halt}-halting local class H\mathrm{H}, nPACε,δ(Rollhalt(H))=O((DSdim(H)+log(1/δ))/ε)n_{\mathrm{PAC}}^{\varepsilon,δ}(\operatorname{Roll}_{\mathtt{halt}}(\mathrm{H}))=O((\operatorname{DSdim}(\mathrm{H})+\log(1/δ))/\varepsilon), with no dependence on rollout length. The dependence on DSdim(H)\operatorname{DSdim}(\mathrm{H}) is worst-case optimal, since one-step stopping recovers ordinary multiclass learning of H\mathrm{H}. The proof introduces parity dimension, a rollout-stable refinement of DS dimension based on even pseudo-cubes. It controls one-inclusion density via a low-coordinate spanning theorem on finite restrictions and, unlike DS dimension itself, does not increase under autoregressive rollout. We also show why this detour is necessary: DS dimension can increase under rollout.
Zhiyuan Li
Sep 21, 2026stat.ML

Adversarially Robust PAC Learning with Optimal VC Rates

We study the problem of \emph{adversarially robust} PAC learning. In this framework, the learner observes independent samples from an unknown distribution over X×{0,1}\mathcal{X} \times \{0,1\}, as in classical PAC learning. However, given a perturbation map U:X2X\mathcal{U} : \mathcal{X} \to 2^{\mathcal{X}} known to the learner, the goal is to output, with high probability, a predictor that correctly classifies \emph{every} perturbation zU(x)z \in \mathcal{U}(x) of most future examples (x,y)(x,y) drawn from the same underlying distribution. We determine the \emph{optimal} U\mathcal{U}-independent sample complexity of this problem in both the realizable and agnostic settings. More specifically, for every concept class H\mathcal{H} of VC\operatorname{VC} dimension dd, we prove upper bounds of O(d/ε+log(1/δ)/ε)\mathcal{O} \big( d/ε+ \log(1/δ)/ε\big) in the realizable setting and O(d/ε2+log(1/δ)/ε2)\mathcal{O} \big( d/ε^2 + \log(1/δ)/ε^2 \big) in the agnostic setting, together with an optimal first-order refinement of the latter. These bounds match the corresponding lower bounds for classical PAC learning. Consequently, and perhaps surprisingly, adversarial robustness incurs \emph{no additional} distribution-free statistical cost, uniformly over all perturbation maps. Our bounds improve exponentially on those of [Montasser, Hanneke, and Srebro; COLT '19]. On the technical side, we present short and elementary proofs based on a new algorithmic principle that we call \emph{binomial-bagging}. We believe that binomial-bagging and its analysis may be of independent interest.
Steve Hanneke, Amirreza Shaeiri