Masked Autoencoders with Limited Data: Does It Work? A Fine-Grained Bioacoustics Case Study

Passive acoustic monitoring can measure biodiversity at larger scales, but time--frequency annotation of animal vocalizations is expensive, site-specific, and difficult to sustain at scale. We present a label-efficient sound detection framework that combines masked audio pretraining with a lightweight detector on mel spectrograms, then further improves robustness through iterative self-training on unlabeled audio. We first pretrain a ViT-based encoder on unlabeled recordings via masked reconstruction and transfer the encoder to a detection backbone. To better separate animal sounds from confounding background, we add a box-level contrastive loss that pulls matched event regions together while pushing noisy negatives apart. We then apply a two-stage pseudo-labeling curriculum to exploit large unlabeled pools without additional annotation. We evaluate the performance on two ecologically distinct domains: tropical rainforest soundscapes (Indonesia) and bird vocalizations in Mediterranean habitats (Spain). On both domains, masked audio pretraining and contrastive learning consistently improve time--frequency detection under temporal and cross-site distribution shift, and self-training yields further gains in out-of-distribution performance. On the rainforest domain, MAST with self-training achieves +0.22 mAP and +0.24 F1 over the strongest baseline under cross-site shift. On the bird domain, self-training achieves +0.12 mAP and +0.10 F1 over the strongest baseline under cross-site shift. Overall, our results show that MAST can effectively extend self-supervised audio representations from clip-level tasks to robust box-level localization across diverse bioacoustic settings, providing a practical path for biodiversity monitoring with limited labels.

Passive acoustic monitoring is an important tool for biodiversity assessment and wildlife conservation because it supports continuous and non-invasive monitoring of species across large spatial and temporal scales. Robust monitoring remains challenging because many datasets contain sparse positive labels, where species presences may be confirmed while unannotated species cannot be assumed absent. In this work, we study transfer learning under sparse positive labels using BirdCLEF+ 2026 as a target benchmark and BirdCLEF 2021, iNatSounds, WABAD, and BirdSet as external bioacoustic sources. We introduce a multi-source reliability framework that models heterogeneous bioacoustic datasets as distinct supervision sources with differing reliability. Our approach achieves 0.584 macro average precision and 0.860 macro AUC on public BirdCLEF+ 2026 validation labels while outperforming naive source pooling strategies. The strongest gains arise from passive acoustic monitoring datasets and biologically informed source selection. Our findings suggest that transfer learning in bioacoustics is fundamentally a weak supervision and negative transfer problem.

Pretrained audio embeddings are standard in bioacoustics, yet little is known about which acoustic features these models encode, nor which are useful for a given task. This hinders transparency and limits extension to rare species or data-scarce domains. Here we reveal which speech-like features are encoded in bioacoustic representations. Using the 88~eGeMAPS features across six taxonomic groups, we apply linear and nonlinear regression probes to quantify which acoustic properties each model captures. Results confirm a ``no free lunch'' pattern: no single model captures the full feature space. A concatenated embedding achieves the highest performance, suggesting complementary acoustic space coverage across models. Loudness features are best encoded ($R^2 = 0.76$) while F0 is hardest to recover ($R^2 = 0.33$). By cross-referencing recoverability with per-species feature salience (NMI), we derive data-driven model selection guidance for bioacoustics.