cs.LGMay 14, 2026

On the Stability of Growth in Structural Plasticity

Authors: Lute Lillo, Nick Cheney

Organizations: University of Vermont

Abstract

Standard deep-learning pipelines usually choose the network architecture before training and keep it fixed throughout optimization. In contrast, a model can also be adapted by editing its structure during training, for example by pruning existing hidden-neuron units or growing new ones. Although growth is appealing for adaptive and continual systems, we show that it is not simply the inverse of pruning. Pruning selects among units that have participated in training from the start, whereas growth inserts new units into an already specialized optimization trajectory. We isolate this insertion problem and show that newborn units are often forward-active but backward-starved: they participate in the forward computation, yet receive much weaker gradient signal than incumbent units. This disadvantage is minor in small MLP benchmarks, but becomes clear in harder image-classification settings with a convolutional trunk. In these settings, \textsc{Grow} can achieve high final accuracy during the structural-editing procedure, while \textsc{Prune} is stronger when performance is averaged over the training trajectory or when the final sparse network is retrained from scratch. Interventions targeting optimizer state, insertion, selection, and trainability show that improving the integration of newborn units can improve adaptive performance, but does not automatically produce better final subnetworks. In continual-learning benchmarks stressing plasticity loss, \textsc{Grow} becomes competitive mainly when new units have enough time to integrate. Together, these results suggest that \textsc{Grow} should be evaluated not only as an architecture-search operator, but as a time-sensitive optimization process whose success depends on insertion stability.

Explore similar work

CardsList
Aug 2, 2026cs.LG

Plasticity of Growing and Elastic Neural Networks in Online Continual Learning

Neural networks that can grow or both grow and shrink during learning, referred to as growing neural networks and elastic neural networks, respectively, have recently been explored in offline continual learning with a particular focus on catastrophic forgetting. Driven by the observations that 1) online continual learning closely resembles how animals learn; 2) loss of plasticity---the progressive decline in a learning network's ability to learn---is another crucial challenge facing continual learning; and 3) incremental introduction of randomly initialized hidden units was recently shown to help preserve plasticity, in this paper, we study the plasticity of several foundational growing and elastic networks in online continual learning. Our experiments in supervised learning settings show that adaptive growing networks, which incrementally incorporate new, randomly initialized units to the network while keeping all existing connections adaptive, can maintain high prediction accuracy without losing plasticity despite the continuous increase in the dead hidden unit proportion. Furthermore, we demonstrate that adaptive elastic networks, which in addition to progressively adding new hidden units also prune estimated dead hidden units at the beginning of each new task, can achieve excellent accuracy without loss of plasticity while simultaneously maintaining a near-constant, compact size. Our results suggest that growing and elastic networks, which exhibit the ability to adapt its structure to the relevant learning objectives, can be a promising class of algorithms also for preserving high plasticity in online continual learning.
Jeong Min Kong, Richard S. Sutton
PlasticityEfficient Continual LearningContinual LearningArtificial Neural NetworksCatastrophic Forgetting
AskPDF
May 9, 2026cs.LG

Predicting Plasticity in Deep Continual Learning: A Theoretical Perspective

Deep continual learning requires models to adapt to new tasks without retraining from scratch. However, neural networks can lose their ability to adapt to new tasks after training on previous ones, a phenomenon known as loss of plasticity. There have been several explanations and diagnostics proposed for plasticity loss. Motivated by the philosophy that "all models are wrong, but some are useful", we ask: can existing diagnostics predict a neural network's plasticity? In this work, we take a practical view to interpret plasticity as trainability, i.e., a neural network's future optimization gain on a target task. We first take a theoretical approach, showing, by constructing a few counterexamples, that some widely adopted diagnostics of plasticity, including representation rank and neural tangent kernel rank, can fail to predict the loss of trainability in both regression and classification settings. We instead propose a novel metric, called optimization readiness, which combines gradient strength and gradient reliability. We prove that optimization readiness lower bounds one-step optimization gain under standard smoothness assumptions, providing a theoretical guarantee for its predictive power. Empirically, we show that across commonly used deep continual learning settings, such as Slowly-Changing Regression and Permuted MNIST, optimization readiness more reliably ranks checkpoints by trainability than prior diagnostics, even with substantially fewer samples.
Jiuqi Wang, Jayanth Srinivasa, Claire Chen +3
PlasticityEfficient Continual LearningContinual LearningGradientTheoretical Foundations
AskPDF
Jun 8, 2026cs.LG

Preserving Plasticity in Continual Learning via Dynamical Isometry

Continual training of deep neural networks under non-stationarity often leads to a progressive loss of plasticity, eventually limiting further learning. We relate plasticity to the empirical Neural Tangent Kernel, and identify dynamical isometry (the condition that layer-wise Jacobian singular values remain close to one) as a key mechanism for preserving plasticity in continual learning. We revisit a class of networks that are almost-everywhere isometric while remaining universal Lipschitz function approximators, demonstrating that near-dynamical isometry is compatible with expressive nonlinear representations. For general architectures, we propose an efficient isometry-promoting regularization scheme and identify a novel mechanism by which it can reactivate dormant ReLU units. Building on this, we introduce AdamO, an Adam-style adaptive optimizer that decouples isometry regularization from gradient updates, analogous to AdamW. We further reinterpret prior plasticity-preserving approaches through the lens of dynamical isometry, showing that they target only a partial measure of isometry. Across supervised and reinforcement-learning continual-learning benchmarks designed to induce plasticity loss, our methods consistently match or outperform existing approaches.
Andries Rosseau, Robert Müller, Ann Nowé
PlasticityEfficient Continual LearningContinual LearningNeural Tangent KernelAdam
AskPDF