AGC: Adaptive Geodesic Correction for Adversarial Robustness on Vision-Language Models

Vision-language models such as CLIP have achieved remarkable zero-shot recognition capabilities, yet their robustness against adversarial perturbations remains limited. Test-time counterattack (TTC) was recently proposed to improve CLIP's robustness by perturbing an input image to steer it away from a corrupted state during inference. However, TTC remains fragile under strong attacks because its counterattack relies on a directly corrupted original view and employs a noise-driven hard-gating scheme that cannot adapt to varying corruption severity. To address these limitations, we introduce Multi-view guided Adaptive Counterattack (MAC), which performs counterattacks for multi-view with corruption-aware soft weighting. Specifically, MAC first constructs augmented views of an input image to obtain diverse embeddings. It then performs counterattacks to refine corrupted embeddings of views. Next, MAC adaptively scales the counterattack intensity for each view based on its estimated corruption degree. Finally, the adaptively counterattacked views are aggregated to yield a robust final prediction. Extensive experiments across 20 datasets and diverse attack scenarios demonstrate that MAC substantially improves robustness while preserving high inference speed and memory efficiency with its tuning-free design. Our code is available at https://github.com/sunoh-kim/MAC.

Training-free test-time defenses offer a practical way to improve the adversarial robustness of CLIP-style vision--language models without modifying the pretrained model. However, their correction strength is typically fixed for a narrow range of attack budgets, even though the attack budget is unknown at inference and the required correction varies across samples. We show that this mismatch causes existing defenses to degrade sharply as attacks strengthen. We introduce ReACT-CLIP, a response-conditioned test-time defense that separately determines how strongly each input should be corrected and whether defensive intervention is necessary. Our key observation is that the relative increase in CLIP visual-feature drift between low- and high-noise probes provides a graded, sample-specific proxy for correction demand. ReACT-CLIP maps this relative cross-noise drift to the Gaussian noise scale used to construct a stable, noise-averaged feature anchor, enabling the corrective reach to adapt to each input. To determine whether intervention is necessary, we further observe that clean inputs retain stable class-probability distributions under weak spatial augmentations, whereas adversarial inputs exhibit greater variation. ReACT-CLIP quantifies this variation using a prediction-instability score computed by Jensen--Shannon divergence and combines it with relative cross-noise drift to form the defensive intervention score. ReACT-CLIP requires no model or prompt training, and its correction-strength mapping is calibrated once and fixed across datasets and attack budgets. Across 12 downstream datasets, as well as ImageNet and its distribution-shifted variants, ReACT-CLIP delivers substantial robustness gains across diverse attack types and strengths while largely preserving clean accuracy.

Vision-language models (VLMs) such as CLIP show strong zero-shot generalization but remain highly vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Adversarial training improves robustness but is computationally expensive, motivating test-time defenses. Recent approaches exploit how CLIP's visual representations respond to stochastic perturbations: aggregating predictions across noisy views, constructing Gaussian noise-averaged anchors and interpolating features toward them, or applying counter-perturbations. These strategies improve robustness but often degrade clean accuracy, yielding an unfavorable clean-robust trade-off. We revisit stochastic test-time defenses and identify an underexplored noise-regime transition in CLIP's representation space. Prior work explored perturbations mainly in the weak-noise regime, where adversarial examples can appear unusually stable (false stability). Our analysis shows this reverses as perturbation strength grows: beyond the weak-noise regime, adversarial representations become markedly more unstable than clean ones, giving a clearer separation signal. The transition is consistent across uniform and Gaussian noise, photometric and geometric transforms, datasets, and diverse attacks. It largely disappears in adversarially trained models, suggesting it is tied to the fragile local-basin geometry of adversarial representations in non-robust CLIP. We propose a training-free, plug-in drift-gated mechanism that uses high-noise feature drift as a lightweight gating signal to trigger existing test-time defenses only when adversarial-like instability is detected. Across 13 datasets it consistently improves the clean-robust trade-off. On eight fine-grained datasets, mean clean+adversarial accuracy rises from 65.7% to 71.4% for counterattack defenses and 68.4% to 73.2% for noise-anchoring; on ImageNet and four shifted variants, from 56.1% to 66.2% and 62.1% to 67.6%.