Sampling-based optimization (SBO), like cross-entropy method and evolutionary algorithms, has achieved many successes in solving non-convex problems without gradients, yet its convergence is poorly understood. In this paper, we establish a non-asymptotic convergence analysis for SBO through the lens of smoothing. Specifically, we recast SBO as gradient descent on a smoothed objective, mirroring noise-conditioned score ascent in diffusion models. Our first contribution is a landscape analysis of the smoothed objective, demonstrating how smoothing helps escape local minima and uncovering a fundamental coverage-optimality trade-off: smoothing renders the landscape more benign by enlarging the locally convex region around the global minimizer, but at the cost of introducing an optimality gap. Building on this insight, we establish non-asymptotic convergence guarantees for SBO algorithms to a neighborhood of the global minimizer. Furthermore, we propose an annealed SBO algorithm, Diffusion-Inspired Dual-Annealing (DIDA), which is provably convergent to the global optimum. We conduct extensive numerical experiments to verify our landscape results and also demonstrate the compelling performance of DIDA compared to other gradient-free optimization methods. Lastly, we discuss implications of our results for diffusion models.
Recently, several instances of non-Euclidean SGD, including SignSGD, Lion, and Muon, have attracted significant interest from the optimization community due to their practical success in training deep neural networks. Consequently, a number of works have attempted to explain this success by developing theoretical convergence analyses. Unfortunately, these results cannot properly justify the superior performance of these methods, as they could not beat the convergence rate of vanilla Euclidean SGD. We resolve this important open problem by developing a new unified convergence analysis under the structured smoothness and gradient noise assumption. In particular, our results indicate that non-Euclidean SGD (i) can exploit the sparsity or low-rank structure of the upper bounds on the Hessian and gradient noise, (ii) can provably benefit from popular algorithmic tools such as extrapolation or momentum variance reduction, and (iii) can match the state-of-the-art convergence rates of adaptive and more complex optimization algorithms such as AdaGrad and Shampoo.
Much of the existing theory on first-order non-smooth optimization is built on a restrictive assumption that the gradients of the objective function are uniformly bounded. We introduce a much more realistic class of generalized Lipschitz functions, where the gradient norms are bounded by an affine function of the optimality gap. We then ask a natural question: what algorithm achieves the best global convergence rates for solving convex stochastic generalized Lipschitz optimization problems? To address this, we develop a new convergence analysis for several existing algorithms and find that AdamW with clipped updates, provably outperforms other popular stochastic optimization methods, such as SGD and AdaGrad. Moreover, our analysis establishes the critical role of AdamW's exponentially weighted gradient accumulation, as opposed to simple averaging. We further show that clipped AdamW is universal and achieves improved rates under the popular generalized smoothness assumption, analyze the convergence of clipped AdamW with diagonal and matrix preconditioners, and extend our results to the quasar-convex setting.
Schedule-Free methods have attracted growing interest for alleviating the burden of designing and tuning a learning rate scheduler, while matching and sometimes even outperforming optimizers with tuned schedulers. Despite their strong empirical results, their convergence theory in nonconvex optimization, where modern machine learning objectives typically arise, has remained largely unexplored. In this paper, we provide worst-case analyses of Schedule-Free gradient descent and Schedule-Free stochastic gradient descent, in their standard form and without auxiliary modifications or restrictive conditions, for smooth but possibly nonconvex objectives. Based on a Lyapunov analysis derived from the continuous-time limiting ordinary differential equation associated with these methods, we show that Schedule-Free gradient descent and Schedule-Free stochastic gradient descent achieve the optimal worst-case convergence rates attainable among first-order methods. We further formulate Schedule-Free gradient descent as a nonautonomous dynamical system and prove strict-saddle avoidance under an arbitrarily small one-time perturbation. These theoretical results provide a better understanding of the strong performance that Schedule-Free methods demonstrate.