Unleashing Vision Transformer Potential In Image Quality Assessment via Global-Local Adaptive Interaction

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have been increasingly adopted for Image Quality Assessment (IQA). However, current methods typically employ a static one-shot scoring paradigm, despite the fact that humans assess image quality through dynamic visual inspection, e.g., selectively adjusting views to verify details and subtle artifacts. Specifically, relying solely on a single-pass observation introduces two primary limitations: first, perceiving the image only at a global scale restricts the assessment of finer local details; second, the original intensity distribution of the image may overwhelm the visibility, leading to insufficient inspection of image quality. To address these issues, we propose Tool-IQA, shifting the assessment mechanism from passive scoring to a tool-augmented workflow. In particular, we equip VLMs with simple yet effective view tools: a Magnifier to inspect local details, and a Gamma Corrector to uncover visibility and hidden artifacts. The assessment follows a structured pipeline that consists of an initial observation with rubric notes, a tool-augmented in-depth inspection, and a final quantification for calibrated quality score. Furthermore, to ensure efficient and purposeful tool callings, we introduce a batch-aware training strategy to reward tool interactions that can yield positive contributions rather than simply encouraging usage. Experiments on a variety of IQA benchmarks demonstrate that, with effective tool calling and calibrated assessment, our proposed Tool-IQA significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art models, e.g., it achieves a PLCC of 0.854 on the challenging CLIVE dataset.

Blind image quality assessment (BIQA) predicts perceived image quality without access to a pristine reference and is fundamental to applications such as image compression, transmission, and restoration. Recent BIQA methods increasingly rely on large vision-language models (VLMs). Although frozen VLMs provide an efficient alternative to computationally expensive full fine-tuning, it remains unclear how much performance is sacrificed by not adapting the backbone and, more importantly, under what conditions such adaptation is truly beneficial. Answering this question, however, is complicated by the widespread use of image-level splitting on synthetic-distortion benchmarks, where distorted versions of the same reference image can appear in both training and test partitions. This content overlap artificially inflates the apparent performance of frozen representations, masking their true generalization ability and potentially leading to incorrect conclusions about the value of backbone adaptation. We therefore address these two issues jointly. We develop an efficient BIQA framework that fuses a natural-scene-statistics descriptor with frozen SigLIP and CLIP-H embeddings through a lightweight regression head, and then apply parameter-efficient Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) to the SigLIP backbone, training only $0.23\%$ of its parameters. Evaluating both frozen and adapted models across six datasets under image-level and reference-level protocols, we find that image-level splitting inflates frozen-feature SROCC by up to $0.44$ and masks wide variation in true difficulty, which reference-level evaluation reveals. Under this content-independent protocol, LoRA adaptation recovers performance in proportion to the exposed difficulty, with the largest gains where frozen features generalize poorly (up to $+0.357$ SROCC on TID2013) and little benefit where they are already strong.

Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in image quality assessment (IQA) by bridging visual perception with descriptive evaluations. However, existing approaches mainly focus on holistic quality prediction, often functioning as black boxes that provide limited insight into where distortions occur and how they affect perceived quality, hindering fine-grained analysis of localized and heterogeneous degradations. We propose GS-IQA, a framework that reformulates IQA as a progressive Where--What--How diagnosis, emulating the human perceptual process from an initial glance to closer scrutiny. Since a severity judgment is meaningful only for a correctly localized and recognized region, we realize this progression through a two-stage reinforcement learning paradigm that respects such dependencies: the glance stage uses a perception-gated reward to establish where degradations lie and what they are, activating severity feedback only once both are correct, while the scrutiny stage introduces online reward-conditioned degradation generation to synthesize hard examples targeted at the model's perceptual bottlenecks, sharpening its discrimination of subtle severity variations. To enable systematic evaluation, we construct Diag-Bench, a region-level IQA benchmark of about 25K curated samples spanning 12 distortion types and five ordinal severity levels. Extensive experiments show that GS-IQA consistently surpasses state-of-the-art methods in distortion localization, recognition, and severity estimation, and that its diagnostic representations transfer effectively to conventional global quality prediction across diverse external benchmarks. Code and data will be released.