Quantum Sidecar Architectures for Hybrid AI Training and Inference: Stateful Protected Registers, Stateless Reset-and-Reprepare Circuits and Quantum Weight-State Outlook

We prove inference-time quantum coordination advantages for specified AI state-tracking tasks. A solver compresses semantic history into a future-accessible boundary state and later answers a query. We count communication $B$, persistent instance-dependent memory $M$, and local work $D$; classical recurrence, caches, tools, and recomputation are allowed and charged. The central result is a boundary-preserving semantic-compilation theorem. It maps a finite one-way, streaming, or adaptive causal task into a semantic AI interface while preserving event order and access to past input. Classical boundary-state lower bounds and quantum-memory upper bounds transfer up to explicit compiler overhead, independently of the finite-precision recurrent architecture. Two applications have classical semantics. Matched-entity synopsis QA inherits the hidden-matching separation between $O(\log N)$ qubits and $Ω(\sqrt{N})$ classical boundary bits. Continual requirements auditing inherits a Max-$k$SAT streaming separation: a recurrent solver uses $O(\log^5 n\log(1/δ))$ qubits and polylogarithmic classical workspace to obtain a $0.7172$-approximation, whereas every classical one-pass finite-information solver attaining that ratio requires $Ω(\sqrt{n})$ coordination width. As a quantum-native compiler test, a stabilizer latent-state dialogue uses $n$ qubits, while every exact finite-state classical causal online realization satisfies $B+M \ge \frac{1}{2}n^2+(\frac{3}{2}-\log_2 3)n+O(1)$. The source protocols, streaming algorithms, and stabilizer witness are imported; the new result is their architecture-independent semantic transfer. These are memory and coordination separations, not runtime or empirical advantages for present-day language models. The stabilizer result assumes exact simulation and ideal noiseless quantum memory.

A recurring weakness in quantum machine learning (QML) is that reported ``quantum advantages'' are seldom tested against a \emph{capacity-matched} classical control, leaving it unclear whether a gain comes from the quantum substrate or from the architectural change that accompanies it. Our primary contribution is methodological: a protocol for attributing such gains honestly -- a capacity-matched classical bottleneck of identical parameter budget, transparent reporting of where quantum does \emph{not} help, and validation on real quantum hardware -- which we develop and apply through a concrete case study. That case study is Quantum Adaptive Self-Attention (QASA), a hybrid Transformer that replaces the value projection of a \emph{single} encoder layer with a 36-parameter parameterized quantum circuit (PQC), keeping all other layers classical. Across nine synthetic benchmarks and the real-world ETTh1 dataset, QASA improves on a full-capacity classical Transformer for chaotic and trend-dominated signals. To ask whether this is a genuinely \emph{quantum} effect, we introduce a control rarely applied in quantum machine learning -- a capacity-matched classical bottleneck with the same parameter budget -- and find that it matches the PQC on the error metrics. The gain is therefore attributable to the low-rank value-projection \emph{bottleneck} (an \emph{architectural parsimony} principle), not to quantumness; adding further quantum layers only degrades performance and trainability. We accordingly position the quantum layer not as a source of accuracy advantage but as a \emph{competitive} instantiation of this principle: its low-rank compression onto the signal's intrinsic dimensionality is matched by a classical bottleneck, so the gain is architectural rather than quantum.

Reinforcement learning (RL) can automate quantum architecture search, but its scalability is limited when useful circuit trajectories become rare in the rapidly expanding search space. Existing replay mechanisms reuse observed transitions; the proposed learned model produces additional predicted one step transitions from real state-action seeds. Here we introduce GenQAS, a tensor network-guided RL framework that combines a fixed matrix product state warm-start with prioritized generative replay. A learned local transition model generates synthetic circuit transitions on demand and mixes them with real experience during Double Deep Q-Network updates. Under a random exploration analysis, near ground state circuits occupy a rapidly shrinking region of the accessible state space. We investigate whether real data anchored synthetic replay can improve the effective training signal in this regime. Across chemical Hamiltonian benchmarks from 6 to 12 qubits, GenQAS improves fixed-budget success probability and identifies compact circuits at competitive energy error. At 12 qubits, it improves final success probability by up to $7.0\times$ over passive replay. On a 15-qubit transverse field Ising model, GenQAS increases success probability from $12\%$ to $21\%$. In a noisy 6-qubit BeH$_2$ transfer experiment, generative replay reduces the steps to chemical accuracy by $92.7\%$. These results show that generative replay can mitigate sample starvation in quantum architecture search and support more resource efficient circuit discovery.