cs.ROMay 19, 2026

Beyond Binary Success: A Diagnostic Meta-Evaluation Framework for Fine-Grained Manipulation

Authors: He-Yang Xu, Pengyuan Zhang, Zongyuan Ge, Xiaoshuai Hao, Serge Belongie, Xin Geng, Yuxin Peng, Xiu-Shen Wei

Abstract

Fine-grained manipulation marks a regime where global scene context no longer suffices, and success hinges on the tight coupling of local attribute grounding, high-fidelity spatial perception, and constraint-respecting motor execution. However, current embodied AI benchmarks collapse these capacities into binary success rates, systematically inflating reported capabilities by up to 70% and masking the architectural bottlenecks that impede real-world deployment. We introduce MetaFine, a diagnostic meta-evaluation framework that disentangles manipulation competency along three axes: understanding, perception, and controlled behavior. Built on a compositional task graph, MetaFine absorbs heterogeneous external benchmarks and reconstructs them into diagnostic scenarios of varying complexity under a unified protocol. Evaluating state-of-the-art vision-language-action (VLA) models through this lens exposes severe dimension-specific failures invisible to conventional metrics. Through targeted causal intervention, we identify the visual encoder's ability to preserve local spatial structure as a key bottleneck for fine-grained precision: improving it directly unlocks previously inaccessible manipulation capabilities without modifying downstream policies. MetaFine further supports hybrid real-sim validation, using limited paired real-world rollouts to calibrate scalable simulation-based estimates for more stable physical benchmarking. By shifting evaluation from ranking to diagnosis, MetaFine turns benchmarking into an actionable compass for repairing the layered capacities underlying genuine physical dexterity. The MetaFine framework, benchmarks, and supporting resources will be publicly released at our project page: https://metafine.github.io/.

Explore similar work

CardsList
Nov 24, 2025cs.CV

Beyond Description: Cognitively Benchmarking Fine-Grained Action for Embodied Agents

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) show promising results as decision-making engines for embodied agents operating in complex, physical environments. However, existing benchmarks often prioritize high-level planning or spatial reasoning, leaving the fine-grained action intelligence required for embodied physical interaction underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce CFG-Bench, a new benchmark designed to systematically evaluate this crucial capability. CFG-Bench consists of 1,368 curated videos paired with 19,562 question-answer pairs spanning three evaluation paradigms targeting four cognitive abilities: 1) Physical Interaction, 2) Temporal-Causal Relation, 3) Intentional Understanding, and 4) Evaluative Judgment. Together, these dimensions provide a systematic framework for assessing a model's ability to translate visual observations into actionable knowledge, moving beyond mere surface-level recognition. Our comprehensive evaluation on CFG-Bench reveals that leading MLLMs struggle to produce detailed instructions for physical interactions and exhibit profound limitations in the higher-order reasoning of intention and evaluation. Moreover, supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on our data demonstrates that teaching an MLLMs to articulate fine-grained actions directly translates to significant performance gains on established embodied benchmarks. Our analysis highlights these limitations and offers insights for developing more capable and grounded embodied agents. Project page: https://cfg-bench.github.io/
Dayong Liu, Chao Xu, Weihong Chen +5
Embodied AgentsFine-Grained ActionsMultimodal AgentsAgentic BenchmarksSpatial ReasoningNatural Language Descriptions
AskPDF
Jan 26, 2026cs.RO

Eval-Actions: Fine-Grained Execution Quality Evaluation for Robotic Manipulation

Although Vision--Action (VA) and Vision--Language--Action (VLA) policies have advanced robotic manipulation, their evaluation remains dominated by binary success rates, which obscure process-level differences among executions that complete the same task. We introduce Eval-Actions, a diagnostic evaluation methodology and real-robot benchmark for fine-grained execution-quality assessment of learned manipulation policies. Eval-Actions combines criteria-based Expert Grading (EG), Rank-Guided (RG) labels that align measurable motion indicators with expert rankings, and Chain-of-Thought-style (CoT) annotations that explain observable quality differences. The benchmark contains 13K+ teleoperated and policy-generated real-robot episodes covering 150+ tasks and approximately 52 hours of recordings with RGB-D videos, robot-state trajectories, task descriptions, and success/failure labels. Its densely annotated subset provides EG/RG/CoT supervision for training and evaluation. We further provide AutoEval, a reference multimodal evaluator that predicts quality scores, task outcomes, and diagnostic explanations from RGB temporal evidence and compact kinematic summaries. On the annotated Eval-Actions test split, AutoEval-S achieves Spearman rank correlations (SRCCs) of 0.81 and 0.84 under EG and RG, with success detection accuracies of 90.6% and 91.0%; AutoEval-P reaches 0.70 SRCC under CoT. Analyses of expert consistency, physical-metric baselines, modality ablations, structured generalization, and offline policy ranking show that Eval-Actions provides standardized, interpretable diagnostic signals complementary to success-rate evaluation.
Mengyuan Liu, Juyi Sheng, Peiming Li +4
Multimodal EvaluationGrading
AskPDF
Mar 30, 2026cs.RO

ManipArena: Comprehensive Real-world Evaluation of Reasoning-Oriented Generalist Robot Manipulation

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models and world-action models have emerged as central paradigms for general-purpose robotic intelligence, yet their empirical progress remains constrained by the absence of evaluation protocols that are both physically realistic and diagnostically controlled. Simulator-centric benchmarks provide scale and reproducibility, but cannot fully capture the reality gap induced by perception noise, contact dynamics, latency, calibration error, and hardware constraints. Conversely, real-robot evaluations are often fragmented across platforms, scenes, objects, and scoring rules, making fair comparison and failure attribution difficult. We introduce ManipArena, a standardized real-robot evaluation framework for studying manipulation generalization under matched physical conditions. ManipArena comprises 20 tasks, 10,812 expert trajectories, 13.5M frames, and approximately 188 robot hours across tabletop and mobile manipulation. The framework combines schema-defined task variation, stratified in-domain, visualshift, and semantic-OOD trials, subtask-level partial-credit scoring, three-level language annotations, low-level motor signals, and paired real-to-sim environments reconstructed from physical scenes. Using ManipArena, we evaluate seven tabletop configurations spanning VLA and world-action-model policies. The results show that real-robot conclusions depend not only on architecture, but also on model provenance, fine-tuning regime, data sampling, and annotation granularity. ManipArena thus provides a reproducible and interpretable foundation for diagnosing capability boundaries and failure modes in embodied generalization.
Yu Sun, Meng Cao, Yang Ping +24
Robot SystemsManipulationWorld ModelsStructural Generalization
AskPDF