LEAP: A closed-loop framework for perovskite precursor additive discovery

As a pioneer of the third-generation photovoltaic revolution, Perovskite Solar Cells (PSCs) are renowned for their superior optoelectronic performance and cost potential. The development process of PSCs is precise and complex, involving a series of closed-loop workflows such as literature retrieval, data integration, experimental design, and synthesis. However, existing AI perovskite approaches focus predominantly on discrete models, including material design, process optimization,and property prediction. These models fail to propagate physical constraints across the workflow, hindering end-to-end optimization. In this paper, we propose a multi-agent system for perovskite material discovery, named PeroMAS. We first encapsulated a series of perovskite-specific tools into Model Context Protocols (MCPs). By planning and invoking these tools, PeroMAS can design perovskite materials under multi-objective constraints, covering the entire process from literature retrieval and data extraction to property prediction and mechanism analysis. Furthermore, we construct an evaluation benchmark by perovskite human experts to assess this multi-agent system. Results demonstrate that, compared to single Large Language Model (LLM) or traditional search strategies, our system significantly enhances discovery efficiency. It successfully identified candidate materials satisfying multi-objective constraints. Notably, we verify PeroMAS's effectiveness in the physical world through real synthesis experiments.

Double perovskites (DPs) offer broad compositional tunability, but predicting the space groups (SGs) of stable structures remains difficult because available datasets are often strongly imbalanced toward dominant SG classes. We refer to dominant SG classes as major SGs and underrepresented classes as minor SGs. We introduce Dynamic and Diversity-enhanced Few-shot Retrieval and Rule-Guided Inference for Space-Group Prediction (DyRIS), an LLM-agent-based framework that predicts ranked SG candidates from a given DP composition. DyRIS uses diversity-enhanced dynamic few-shot prompting to retrieve relevant in-context examples while limiting the dominance of frequently represented SGs. It further incorporates rule-guided inference based on B/B' cation ordering, quantitative indicators, and major-SG bias control to refine and rank the final Top-3 SG candidates. We evaluate DyRIS on 3,528 thermodynamically filtered DP entries and compare it with composition-based and descriptor-based baselines. At a training-data ratio of 0.5, DyRIS achieves competitive overall accuracy while obtaining the best Overall Top-1 macro-F1 score and the best performance across all Minor-SG metrics. DyRIS improves Minor-SG Top-1 accuracy by 3.26 percentage points relative to CrabNet and achieves higher Minor-SG Top-3 accuracy than the strongest PyCaret-based baseline. Ablation studies show that diversity-enhanced retrieval, quantitative indicators, major-SG bias control, and B/B' ordering information each contribute to prediction performance. Additional experiments show that the final rule-guided inference step is not easily replaced by conventional classifier- or ranker-based models. These findings demonstrate the potential of combining retrieval-based LLM reasoning with crystallographic domain knowledge for SG prediction in imbalanced materials datasets.

Kinetic model discovery is a central challenge in chemical engineering, as accurate rate expressions are essential for understanding and controlling chemical and biological processes. Symbolic regression (SR) has emerged as a powerful data-driven approach for identifying interpretable kinetic models, but usually operates without domain knowledge, often exploring physicochemically implausible models. Large language models (LLMs) offer a promising avenue for injecting domain expertise into this search. Here, we introduce an LLM-guided SR framework, embedding an LLM module within an iterative SR algorithm for automated kinetic model discovery. The LLM performs two roles at each iteration: (1) a qualitative physicochemical critique of the best SR candidates, and (2) the proposal of new candidate rate expressions guided by the SR-generated models and embedded chemical knowledge. Our framework is evaluated on four in silico case studies of increasing complexity, spanning heterogeneous catalysis and bioprocess systems. Results show the LLM-guided framework reduces iterations to identify the ground-truth model by $41.7-79.3\%$ versus a state-of-the-art SR framework, with the LLM directly proposing the correct model structure in over half of the guided runs. In practical settings, where each iteration typically requires a new wet-lab experiment, this translates into a substantial reduction in experimental effort. Predictive performance on an independent validation set is equivalent between both approaches, with $R^2>0.98$ in all case studies. Ablation studies indicate that both the SR component and the LLM scale contribute to this performance, with a reduced-size LLM largely retaining discovery efficiency. These findings demonstrate that LLMs can effectively inject domain knowledge into scientific model discovery, paving the way toward fully automated, domain-aware kinetic modelling pipelines.