WildRoadBench: A Wild Aerial Road-Damage Grounding Benchmark for Vision-Language Models and Autonomous Agents

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly deployed as reasoning agents in real-world visual assessment pipelines, yet their spatial grounding remains unreliable for fine-grained, visually ambiguous targets. We study this gap in the context of automated vehicle damage assessment, where fine-grained defects such as scratches and hairline cracks occupy few pixels, produce weak gradient signal, and are easily confused with reflections and surface texture. We show that a state-of-the-art VLM (Qwen-VL) achieves strong semantic classification accuracy (87.3%) on this task but is systematically ungrounded at the spatial level: it hallucinates damage in reflective regions, misses elongated scratches entirely, and produces spatially inconsistent outputs when prompted for localization. We propose TinyDamage, a hybrid architecture that delegates spatial grounding to a dedicated multi-task segmentation model while reserving the VLM for semantic reasoning and report generation. On the segmentation side, we find that the choice of loss function has an outsized and underexplored effect on tiny-object grounding: focal loss, widely used for class imbalance, collapses tiny-damage detection to zero, while a supervised contrastive objective measurably improves damage/background separability. We integrate the segmentation model into a 7-node LangGraph agent pipeline that grounds every VLM generation step in the segmentation output, and show that this grounding reduces the report hallucination rate from 92% (text-only) and 78% (image-only) to 31% in a controlled evaluation on 100 human-verified reports. We introduce DET_l, a permissive per-category detection metric for evaluating tiny-object grounding under class imbalance, and report latency and reliability characteristics of the deployed pipeline.

Air-Ground Object Search (AGOS) in urban environments is a challenging embodied task, which requires an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and an Unmanned Ground Vehicle (UGV) to jointly search for and verify a specified target vehicle from multi-view visual references. To study this underexplored problem, we introduce AGOS-Bench, the first dedicated benchmark for evaluating whether general-purpose Vision-Language Models (VLMs) can integrate aerial discoveries and ground-level verification through UAV-UGV cooperation. We further provide AGOS-Dataset as the companion resource of exemplary trajectories constructed by an automatic pipeline. It consists of 7.7k episodes for searching objects of diverse categories and attributes, spanning three difficulty levels. To address the AGOS task, we propose AGOS-Agent, a training-free and tool-augmented approach. The agentic method relieves VLMs from complex and dynamic coordination via a deliberate search-handoff-verify cooperation protocol, only demanding VLMs for scene understanding and decision-making. Extensive experiments on nine VLMs show that AGOS-Agent improves overall success rate for eight of the nine evaluated backbones while reducing decision steps for all nine. On the hard split, the SR and SPL of Gemini-3.6-Flash increase from 8.6% to 55.7% and from 7.6% to 44.0%, respectively.

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models with integrated reasoning have been proposed for end-to-end autonomous driving, assuming a tight coupling between reasoning and trajectory generation. However, the robustness of such systems under realistic input perturbations remains largely unexplored. We show that these models are highly vulnerable to realistic input perturbations, achieving up to 89% attack success rate (ASR) on reasoning and up to 72% on trajectory manipulation in closed-loop simulation, leading to increased collision rates and degraded safety metrics. Using NVIDIA's recent Alpamayo models as representative industry-developed VLAs, we conduct the first systematic black-box study of reasoning-enabled VLA models under realistic textual input corruptions, evaluating their impact on reasoning and driving behavior. We introduce a reasoning-aware evaluation framework capturing both semantic and structural aspects of reasoning, along with safety-centric measures. We also introduce a benchmark for evaluating attacks and defenses on reasoning-trajectory interactions in autonomous driving. Our results highlight the need for rigorous evaluation and improved defenses to ensure the safety of reasoning-enabled VLA systems in autonomous driving.