Seeing Through Fog: Towards Fog-Invariant Action Recognition

Action recognition is a fundamental ability for social species. Yet, its underlying computations are not well understood. Classical psychophysical studies using simplified stimuli have shown that humans can perceive body motion even under degradation of relevant shape cues. Recent work using real-world action videos and their appearance-free counterparts (that preserve motion but lack static shape cues) included explicit training of humans and models on the appearance-free videos. Whether humans and vision models generalize in a zero-shot manner to appearance-free transformations of real-world action videos is not yet known. To measure this generalization in humans, we conducted a laboratory-based psychophysics experiment. 22 participants were trained to recognize five action categories using naturalistic videos (UCF5 dataset), and tested zero-shot on two types of appearance-free transformations: (i) dense-noise motion videos from an existing dataset (AFD5) and (ii) random-dot appearance-free videos. We find that participants recognize actions in both types of appearance-free videos well above chance, albeit with reduced accuracy compared to naturalistic videos. To model this behavior, we developed a two-pathway 3D CNN-based model combining an RGB (form) stream and an optical flow (motion) stream, including a coherence-gating mechanism inspired by Gestalt common-fate grouping. Our model generalizes to both appearance-free datasets and outperforms contemporary video classification models, narrowing the gap to human performance. We find that the motion pathway is critical for generalization to appearance-free videos, while the form pathway improves performance on naturalistic videos. Our findings highlight the importance of motion-based representations for generalization to appearance-free videos, and support the use of multi-stream architectures to model video-based action recognition.

Zero-shot action recognition is challenging due to the semantic gap between seen and unseen classes. We present a novel framework that enhances CLIP with disentangled embeddings and semantic-guided interaction. A Motion Separation Module (MSM) separates motion-sensitive and global-static features, while a Motion Aggregation Block (MAB) employs gated cross-attention to refine motion representation without re-coupling redundant information. To facilitate generalization to unseen categories, we enforce semantic alignment between video features and textual representations by aligning projected embeddings with positive textual prompts, while leveraging negative prompts to explicitly model "non-class" semantics. Experiments on standard benchmarks demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms prior CLIP-based approaches, achieving robust zero-shot action recognition across both coarse and fine-grained datasets.

Videos are unique in their ability to capture actions which transcend multiple frames. Accordingly, for many years action recognition was the quintessential task for video understanding. Unfortunately, due to a lack of sufficiently diverse and challenging data, modern vision-language models (VLMs) are no longer evaluated on their action recognition capabilities. To revitalize action recognition in the era of VLMs, we advocate for a returned focus on domain-specific actions. To this end, we introduce VideoNet, a domain-specific action recognition benchmark covering 1,000 distinct actions from 37 domains. We begin with a multiple-choice evaluation setting, where the difference between closed and open models is stark: Gemini 3.1 Pro attains 69.9% accuracy while Qwen3-VL-8B gets a mere 45.0%. To understand why VLMs struggle on VideoNet, we relax the questions into a binary setting, where random chance is 50%. Still, Qwen achieves only 59.2% accuracy. Further relaxing the evaluation setup, we provide $k\in\{1,2,3\}$ in-context examples of the action. Some models excel in the few-shot setting, while others falter; Qwen improves $+7.0\%$, while Gemini declines $-4.8\%$. Notably, these gains fall short of the $+13.6\%$ improvement in non-expert humans when given few-shot examples. Finding that VLMs struggle to fully exploit in-context examples, we shift from test-time improvements to the training side. We collect the first large-scale training dataset for domain-specific actions, totaling nearly 500k video question-answer pairs. Fine-tuning a Molmo2-4B model on our data, we surpass all open-weight 8B models on the VideoNet benchmark.