What Does the Caption Really Say? Counterfactual Phrase Intervention for Compositional Data Selection in Vision-Language Pretraining

Contrastive vision-language models continue to be the dominant approach for image-text retrieval. Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP) trains two neural networks to align their image and text embeddings in a shared latent space. As a challenging case-study for neurosymbolic AI, recent results evaluating CLIP on negated or paraphrased text have shown mixed performance as these are difficult to define formally for text data. Negation produces the opposite meaning using various possible but small lexical changes. Paraphrasing may use very different textual expressions to denote essentially the same thing. As a result, learning of paraphrasing and negation together poses a significant challenge because of the above mismatch between changes in syntax and intended meaning expected to be captured by distances in embedding space. This paper proposes a new CLIP contrastive loss function capable of balancing the requirements of having both paraphrasing and negation. It applies training triplets consisting of original, paraphrased and negated text generated by multiple large language models to the evaluation of CLIP models. The approach, called SemCLIP, aims to learn semantically-relevant and simple embeddings, placing paraphrased captions nearer to the original image embeddings while at the same time pushing negated captions farther away. Empirically, SemCLIP is shown to be capable of preserving roughly the same performance as CLIP augmented with either negation or paraphrasing. Although direct comparisons are difficult to make because the problem of learning with both negation and paraphrasing is different, an expected benefit of SemCLIP should be robustness when applied zero-shot to downstream image classification tasks. Our experiments confirm such robustness as measured by difference in accuracy (mean-accuracy delta) between original and negated captions on five downstream datasets.

Contrastive vision-language models such as CLIP and BLIP are typically trained on short image captions, limiting their ability to retrieve images from detailed textual descriptions. While methods such as Long-CLIP extend the token limit through positional embedding interpolation, we ask a simpler question: does training text granularity alone determine long-text retrieval performance? We present a systematic study of supervision ranging from single captions to multi-sentence paragraphs for contrastive image-text retrieval. Using a synthetic pipeline based on Qwen2-VL and Llama 3.2 Vision, we generate diverse captions, hard negatives, and quality-scored paragraphs for 500K CC3M images. To isolate the effect of text granularity, we fine-tune only the BLIP text encoder while keeping the vision encoder frozen across 10 training configurations. Our paragraph-supervised models match Long-CLIP-L on ShareGPT4V and outperform it by more than 14 points on DOCCI for image-to-text retrieval, without architectural changes. We further show that paragraph supervision enables effective use of long token sequences, whereas caption-only training degrades beyond 60 tokens. Increasing caption diversity improves short-caption retrieval with diminishing returns, while paragraph supervision consistently benefits long-description benchmarks and hard negatives prove detrimental in text-only fine-tuning. Evaluations on Flickr30k, COCO, ShareGPT4V, and DOCCI provide a comprehensive analysis of the trade-offs between text granularity, retrieval direction, and description length.

Vision-language alignment powers open-vocabulary recognition, retrieval, and LVLM grounding, yet natural captions are often underspecified, making similarity brittle and overly confident under paraphrase and omitted details. We aim to learn representations whose matching is stable across caption views and whose confidence reflects how strongly text constrains an image. We propose Text as Partial Constraint (TPC), a core-residual alignment framework that treats multi-view captions as incomplete supervision. It distills a consensus semantic core as the alignment target, learns a single-view core predictor for standard inference with one query, and explicitly discourages vision-language similarity from depending on the orthogonal unsaid residual. An uncertainty-aware contrastive objective further softens alignment when caption views disagree, reducing overconfident updates under weak language constraints. Across zero-shot recognition and adversarial robustness, TPC achieves 81.42/64.05 Top-1 clean/robust accuracy on ImageNet and 76.19/52.03 on an Avg-14 transfer suite, while improving LVLM transfer with 85.16 POPE F1 and 59.57 OKVQA accuracy under an LLaVA-1.5-7B stack. These results suggest that modeling text as a partial constraint is a practical and principled route to more reliable vision-language representations under underspecified language supervision.