Vision foundation models are widely used as frozen backbones across many downstream tasks, making them a single point of failure under adversarial attack. We study multi-level Floyd-Steinberg error-diffusion dithering as a lightweight, model-agnostic input transformation that disrupts adversarial perturbations while preserving semantic content. Unlike prior work, which was limited to binary dithering, grayscale CIFAR-10, and a single small model trained from scratch, we evaluate across six tasks (classification, segmentation, depth estimation, retrieval, captioning, visual question answering), two model families (DINOv2, PaliGemma), and three attacks of increasing strength (PGD, MI-FGSM, SIA), as well as an adaptive attacker using a straight-through estimator. Our results show that Floyd-Steinberg dithering at intermediate quantization levels, especially when combined with post-processing blur, exceeds or matches all tested baselines, including diffusion-based denoising, with substantially less degradation on clean inputs.
A vision foundation model outputs an embedding vector for an image, which can be affected by common editing operations (e.g., JPEG compression, brightness, contrast adjustments). These common perturbations alter embedding vectors and may impact the performance of downstream tasks using these embeddings. In this work, we present the first systematic study on foundation models' robustness to such perturbations. We propose three robustness metrics and formulate five desired mathematical properties for these metrics, analyzing which properties they satisfy or violate. Using these metrics, we evaluate six industry-scale foundation models (OpenAI, Meta) across nine common perturbation categories, finding them generally non-robust. We also show that common perturbations degrade downstream application performance (e.g., classification accuracy) and that robustness values can predict performance impacts. Finally, we propose a fine-tuning approach to improve robustness without sacrificing utility.
While vision and multimodal foundation models underpin critical tasks from perception to complex reasoning, they remain highly vulnerable to adversarial attacks. However, traditional adversarial attacks are typically limited to single, predefined objectives, tightly coupling each attack to a specific model or task, which restricts their scalability and flexibility in real-world scenarios. In this work, we present DarkLLM, a novel attack framework that trains an LLM to translate natural-language attack instructions into latent attack vectors, which are then decoded into visual adversarial perturbations. By leveraging natural-language instruction tuning, DarkLLM not only unifies targeted, untargeted, segmentation, and multi-model attacks within a single framework, but also achieves flexible and controllable adversarial generation, enabling each instruction to produce a perturbation that induces desired behaviors across heterogeneous models. Through extensive experiments across 4 tasks, 13 datasets, and 15 models, we demonstrate that DarkLLM with only 1B parameters can follow attacker instructions and generate highly effective attacks against CLIP, SAM, and frontier LLMs, revealing a systemic vulnerability in modern foundation models.
Vision-language models (VLMs) such as CLIP show strong zero-shot generalization but remain highly vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Adversarial training improves robustness but is computationally expensive, motivating test-time defenses. Recent approaches exploit how CLIP's visual representations respond to stochastic perturbations: aggregating predictions across noisy views, constructing Gaussian noise-averaged anchors and interpolating features toward them, or applying counter-perturbations. These strategies improve robustness but often degrade clean accuracy, yielding an unfavorable clean-robust trade-off. We revisit stochastic test-time defenses and identify an underexplored noise-regime transition in CLIP's representation space. Prior work explored perturbations mainly in the weak-noise regime, where adversarial examples can appear unusually stable (false stability). Our analysis shows this reverses as perturbation strength grows: beyond the weak-noise regime, adversarial representations become markedly more unstable than clean ones, giving a clearer separation signal. The transition is consistent across uniform and Gaussian noise, photometric and geometric transforms, datasets, and diverse attacks. It largely disappears in adversarially trained models, suggesting it is tied to the fragile local-basin geometry of adversarial representations in non-robust CLIP. We propose a training-free, plug-in drift-gated mechanism that uses high-noise feature drift as a lightweight gating signal to trigger existing test-time defenses only when adversarial-like instability is detected. Across 13 datasets it consistently improves the clean-robust trade-off. On eight fine-grained datasets, mean clean+adversarial accuracy rises from 65.7% to 71.4% for counterattack defenses and 68.4% to 73.2% for noise-anchoring; on ImageNet and four shifted variants, from 56.1% to 66.2% and 62.1% to 67.6%.