Slide Deck Q&A Quality Assurance App: A Multi-Stage Pipeline for Pedagogical Question Generation

Automatically generating slide decks from source documents is an important application of large language models (LLMs). Existing benchmarks primarily assess slide completeness and technical depth, while overlooking the target audience as a critical real-world factor. For instance, specialists demand rigorous proofs, whereas decision-makers prioritize actionable conclusions. To bridge this gap, we introduce X+Slides, a benchmark specifically designed for audience-conditioned slide generation. Built on a diverse corpus spanning 113 topics and seven presentation scenes, X+Slides employs a dynamic evaluation framework constructed from 8,133 deduplicated, source-grounded probes. By assigning audience-specific utility weights to the same source-grounded probes, X+Slides reports four complementary metrics: Audience Coverage measures how much audience-essential information is conveyed, Domain-wise Coverage shows which information types are covered, Efficiency measures delivered utility per unit of attention cost, and Correctness verifies whether slide claims are supported by the source. Experiments on DeepPresenter, SlideTailor, and NotebookLM show that current systems can recover a substantial but still incomplete part of audience-essential information: at $τ_A=0.7$, DeepPresenter reaches a best Audience Coverage of 0.714, SlideTailor reaches 0.594, and the NotebookLM ablation reaches 0.853 while showing clear grounding differences. These results indicate that visual quality and broad topic coverage should not be treated as evidence support without source-grounded evaluation.

Automatic academic paper-to-slide generation is inherently iterative, because creating an effective presentation requires repeated cycles of generation, critique, and revision. Recent multi-agent systems partially acknowledge this through internal critique-and-revise loops, while conversational approaches allow users to refine generated slide decks through dialog. However, these refinement processes either remain largely closed to the user or introduce feedback only after a complete deck has been produced, limiting the user's ability to participate in the iterative refinement of narrative flow, content allocation, and presentation emphasis. To address this gap, we introduce ConvDeck, a multi-agent pipeline for conversational paper-to-slide generation that distributes interaction across the pipeline through stage-specific loops, allowing users to iteratively refine both the presentation outline and the final slide deck at the stages where each kind of decision is made. These loops are driven by a refinement mechanism in which agents can think, speak, and act, enabling them to either directly apply edits or respond conversationally to clarify user feedback and discuss revision options. Our evaluation shows that stage-specific conversational feedback improves user-goal satisfaction while preserving narrative coherence, content quality, and visual presentation.

Agentic presentation generation must preserve source content, maintain coherent visual design, render specialized objects, and produce usable artifacts. Existing systems meet only part of this requirement: templates preserve regularity but restrict adaptation, whereas free-form HTML or SVG gives models flexibility at the cost of low-level rendering decisions. This mismatch makes long technical decks brittle, especially when slides contain formulas, code, or data graphics. We present SeaSlides, an agentic slide-generation framework built around a semantic abstraction layer. Rather than authoring coordinates, inline styles, or raw SVG geometry, the model writes structured slide content through reusable components and capability modules, while templates own layout, style, and rendering. We instantiate this principle separately in HTML and Typst: SeaSlides-HTML uses template-defined DOM components, whereas SeaSlides-Typst uses template functions and package-backed modules. Capability modules route equations, code, and charts to dedicated renderers, and three feedback stages localize build errors, project-constraint violations, and visual defects before export. The two systems retain backend-specific syntax and contracts while sharing the same authoring boundary. For evaluation, we combine the 128-task UltraPresent validation setting with SeaSlidesBench-Rich, a new 32-task benchmark stressing mathematics, code, pseudocode, tables, charts, and diagrams. Across four generation models, both SeaSlides backends produce more readable, content-oriented source than SVG-heavy generation. A SeaSlides backend attains the highest rich-content macro-average under three of the four models while maintaining competitive overall qualitative performance. These results support semantic abstraction as a practical authoring principle across presentation backends.