On the Origin of Synthetic Information by Means of Steganographic Inheritance

Artificial ontogeny, developmental encodings, robot reproduction, and inherited controllers are established research directions, yet a narrower question remains: can a newborn artificial agent exhibit measurable biparental heredity before learning, and can that dependence be isolated causally rather than inferred only from parent-offspring resemblance? We introduce Machine Zygote, a computational germline-soma architecture designed to test this question. Two parental germlines are independently mutated and recombined into a zygote that parameterizes development of an initially generic eight-module soma, which is then frozen and evaluated without learning. A preregistered 4 x 4 diallel of 640 offspring shows significant dam and sire dependence for five of six behavioral traits after Holm correction, with parental and interaction components accounting for 36-53 percent of modeled variance across five principal traits. In matched-background interventions (n=60), substituting one parental germline while holding recombination and stochastic background fixed causes phenotype shifts exceeding a same-parent re-mutation control for five of six traits for both parental channels. Recombination also yields excess transgressive offspring for speed and gait frequency. A preregistered developmental-dependence hypothesis is not supported: a quasistatic no-dynamics ablation preserves the mean phenotype distribution while altering parental variance structure. Thus the study supports causal biparental pre-learning heredity in this simulation, but not the stronger claim that recurrent developmental dynamics are necessary. It does not establish physical heredity, biological genetics, or autonomous evolution. The contribution is an intervention-centered framework and reproducible benchmark for separating heredity, development, stochastic variation, and post-birth learning.

Scientific ideas rarely start from a blank page. They inherit mechanisms, repair known limitations, and recombine pieces of earlier work, much like biological genomes. Current benchmarks still say little about whether AI systems can follow this inheritance structure. We present IdeaGene-Bench (IG-Bench), a benchmark for scientific lineage reasoning and lineage-grounded idea generation. IG-Bench is organized around the IdeaGene framework: each paper or proposal is represented as a set of minimal, typed, evidence-grounded Idea Genome objects, and a GenomeDiff aligns these objects to record inheritance, mutation, loss, external import, and novel insertion under six operational evolutionary dynamics. The benchmark contains 1,961 golden lineage traces, 1,085 curated Idea Genome objects, and 920 pairwise GenomeDiff records across 10 scientific domains. It supports two evaluations. IG-Exam (42 task types, 1,029 instances) tests closed-form lineage reasoning across Idea Genome abstraction, inheritance tracing, evolutionary reasoning, and lineage verification. IG-Arena evaluates generation with a lineage-conditioned Population-Evolution Score(PES), asking whether a proposal can be inserted as a coherent descendant of a given lineage population: it should inherit the right Idea Genome objects, vary meaningfully from nearby work, and offer selection value for future research. Experiments on 14 LLM-based scientists expose a compositional bottleneck. The strongest system reaches only 27.3% exact accuracy on lineage reasoning, and structured lineage context reshuffles system rankings rather than helping every participant uniformly.

Increasingly autonomous agentic AI systems pose novel multi-agent risks, such as secret collusion via covert communication channels. The natural defence to these collusion attempts is to monitor plain-text communication, but the efficacy of monitors has been called into doubt by increasingly sophisticated model steganography; indeed, some theoretical schemes have been proposed that are information-theoretically or computationally indistinguishable from good-faith plain-text communication. In this paper, we demonstrate that the complexity of these schemes is no longer a safety barrier, as agentic coding models can already produce undetectable stegosystems when given realistic tool usage, such as code execution or accessing research papers through web searches. Agents also adapt when key ingredients are missing, for example, by adding model-sampling components or implementing related keyed coding schemes. We then frame tacit steganographic coordination between agents as a Schelling-point problem and introduce coordination metrics for estimating when two agents are likely to select compatible schemes without explicit prior agreement. Our results suggest a shift in the threat model for covert communication between AI agents, where the main barrier is no longer whether frontier agents can understand and implement sophisticated stegosystems, but coordination: whether independently acting agents can converge on compatible schemes, keys, and parameters. We find substantial convergence on broad scheme families but limited strict one-shot coordination, suggesting that shared artefacts, repeated interaction, and tool-mediated search are the settings where covert communication risks are most acute. Overall, our findings provide empirical grounding for the recent strategic confinement hypothesis, which assumes that capable agents can construct covert channels that survive monitoring.