DySem: Uncovering Dynamic Semantic Components of Large Language Models for Calculating Semantic Textual Similarity

Large Language Models (LLMs) primarily perform inference at the token level, resulting in substantial memory overhead and compromised computational efficiency. In this paper, we propose a Dynamic Semantic Extraction and Inference (DSEI) framework, which achieves segment-level inference within the latent space through a two-stage training strategy. First, we construct a Dynamic Semantic Autoencoder (DSAE) via self-supervised learning. DSAE dynamically extracts segment-level semantics and compresses them into compact latent representations via adaptive semantic weighting and gated fusion. Subsequently, we integrate the DSAE into the LLM architecture and train the model to infer over dense latent space. DSEI substantially reduces both input and generation sequences and significantly enhances inference efficiency. Extensive experiments conducted on the Wanjuan dataset demonstrate that DSEI reduces perplexity by 48% compared to static sentence-level latent inference baseline. Furthermore, compared to standard LLMs using token-level inference, DSEI accelerates inference speed by 2.5$\times$ and reduces memory overhead by 90%.

Semantic memory retrieval can be conceptualized as navigation through conceptual space. We compared semantic search dynamics between humans and three large language models (GPT-4o, Gemini-2.5-Pro, Claude-Sonnet-4.5) using verbal fluency data. By applying trajectory-based NLP metrics to the items generated by 82 human participants and LLM output across eight temperature settings, we quantified three complementary dimensions: entropy (step size predictability), distance to next (successive semantic steps), and distance to centroid (global dispersion). Humans exhibited higher entropy, larger semantic steps and broader dispersion than all LLMs, indicating more variable and exploratory search. Temperature tuning produced only partial alignments, as individual metrics matched between humans and LLMs at specific settings, but no configuration reproduced the complete human profile (in all dimensions). These findings suggest that human semantic search implements a distinctive balance between local exploitation and global exploration that current model architectures fail to reproduce.

We propose a scalable, multifactorial experimental framework that systematically probes LLM sensitivity to subtle semantic changes in pairwise document comparison. We analogize this as a needle-in-a-haystack problem: a single semantically altered sentence (the needle) is embedded within surrounding context (the hay), and we vary the perturbation type (negation, conjunction swap, named entity replacement), context type (original vs. topically unrelated), needle position, and document length across all combinations, testing five LLMs on tens of thousands of document pairs. Our analysis reveals several striking findings. First, LLMs exhibit a within-document positional bias distinct from previously studied candidate-order effects: most models penalize semantic differences more harshly when they occur earlier in a document. Second, when the altered sentence is surrounded by topically unrelated context, it systematically lowers similarity scores and induces bipolarized scores that indicate either very low or very high similarity. This is consistent with an interpretive frame account in which topically-related context may allow models to contextualize and downweight the alterations. Third, each LLM produces a qualitatively distinct scoring distribution, a stable "fingerprint" that is invariant to perturbation type, yet all models share a universal hierarchy in how leniently they treat different perturbation types. Together, these results demonstrate that LLM semantic similarity scores are sensitive to document structure, context coherence, and model identity in ways that go beyond the semantic change itself, and that the proposed framework offers a practical, LLM-agnostic toolkit for auditing and comparing scoring behavior across current and future models.