MAECO-Lite: Modular Ontology for Dynamic Malware Analysis
Authors: Zekeri Adams, Peter Švec, Ján Kľuka, Roderik Ploszek, Monday Onoja, Štefan Balogh, Martin Homola
Abstract
Capturing dynamic malware behavior in a practical but still semantically precise manner remains a significant challenge in cyber threat intelligence. While standards such as MAEC and STIX provide widely adopted vocabularies for describing malware artifacts and observations, they represent data with considerable complexity in structures that often obscure important ontological distinctions. In particular, they tend to conflate enduring malware artifacts with the events generated during execution, thereby flattening distinctions that are central in foundational standards for ontology design. In this paper, we conduct a foundational ontological analysis of core MAEC and STIX constructs relevant to dynamic malware analysis relying on Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO) as a theoretical lens. Our analysis reveals some ontological mismatches arising from the conflation of artifacts, dispositions, and runtime events in MAEC and STIX that complicate coherent representation of dynamic malware behavior and, from a practical perspective, limit the ability to reason about execution traces. Based on these insights, we propose MAECO-Lite, a lightweight ontology designed to represent data and operationalize their processing for dynamic malware analysis. The ontology adopts a modular structure centered on samples, processes, actions, system artifacts, and MITRE ATT&CK Techniques, while maintaining a clear separation between enduring entities and runtime events. An initial evaluation using description logic concept learning algorithms shows that the simplified ontology significantly improves learning performance, demonstrating that ontologically grounded modelling can enhance both semantic clarity and computational usability.
Traditionally, machine learning methods for PE malware detection have relied on static features like byte histograms, string information, and PE header contents. One barrier to incorporating dynamic analysis features has been the semi-structured nature of sandbox behavior reports. We show that, using the latest generation of large language models with reasoning, it is possible to efficiently process these behavior reports and utilize them as part of a malware detection pipeline. Specifically, we leverage LLMs to generate behavior-based malware detection rules based on a small training set of labeled malware. We find that these detection rules, derived from behavioral features, are much more robust to concept drift than standard static-feature methods, while maintaining practical false positive rates. Finally, we introduce Trident, a system which combines a classic decision tree model over static features, our behavior-based detection rules, and direct LLM analysis of sandbox reports through majority voting. Trident outperforms standard methods using static features, outperforms behavior-based rules alone, and is as resilient to concept drift as active learning methods without requiring retraining.
Modern cybersecurity relies heavily on static machine-learning-based malware classifiers. However, transformations such as packing and other non-semantic modifications applied to executable files limit their reliability. Malware classifiers often learn these unnecessary artifacts rather than the true binary behavior because of the high association between maliciousness and packing. Moreover, these malware classifiers are black boxes, making it difficult to understand what they learn. To address this issue, we proposed a two-part framework using the post-hoc interpretability XAI tool TRUSTEE, followed by a manual analysis of the top features. We conducted several controlled experiments by varying the dataset composition ratios to understand their impact on the results. The top-ranked features across all experiments, identified by TRUSTEE, were predominantly packing artifacts, portable executable(PE) metadata, and n-grams at the string level, rather than malicious semantics. These results suggest that these malware classifiers are highly sensitive to dataset composition and can misinterpret packing as malicious behavior. Our proposed framework allows for the reproducible diagnosis of such biases and forms a guideline for building more robust and semantically meaningful malware detection models
Malware detection remains largely reactive: machine learning models trained on known samples degrade as threats evolve. Understanding evolutionary relationships among malware families can inform proactive defense, but traditional reverse engineering can take months to years to uncover such lineage relationships. We propose MalTree, a framework that applies bioinformatics inspired phylogenetic techniques (UPGMA and Neighbor-Joining) at scale to model malware evolution automatically using structural, behavioral, and image-based features. We introduce temporal validation using VirusTotal timestamps to assess whether inferred trees reflect actual evolutionary order. MalTree achieves 87% temporal consistency, indicating that inferred evolutionary relationships closely align with real-world emergence timelines. Our analysis shows that some families mutate over 10 times faster than others, suggesting that detection strategies should be tailored to family-specific evolutionary tempos. Case studies, including the Mirai botnet, confirm that inferred relationships from our phylogenetic tree align with documented threat intelligence. Our framework provides a foundation for shifting malware analysis from sample-by-sample classification toward lineage-aware evolutionary modeling.
Akash Amalan, Georgios Smaragdakis, Tom J. Viering