Quantum Tunneling-Aware Machine Learning: Physics-Derived Noise Models for Robust Deployment

Uiwon Hwang; Jaeho Hwang

cs.LGMay 30, 2026

Quantum Tunneling-Aware Machine Learning: Physics-Derived Noise Models for Robust Deployment

Authors: Uiwon Hwang, Jaeho Hwang

Abstract

Transistor scaling is approaching a quantum-mechanical limit, as thin gate oxides induce electron leakage through quantum tunneling. Unlike conventional digital systems, AI inference can tolerate such errors provided their structure is modeled correctly. In this paper, we introduce quantum tunneling-aware machine learning (QTAML). We derive the deployment-time weight-error distribution from first principles using the Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin (WKB) approximation and show that it has structure that generic Gaussian noise models miss: an exact affine mean drift, a per-bit variance hierarchy dominated by the most-significant bit, and a per-layer dependence on $\|W_\ell\|_\infty$ and the trained-network Jacobian. We package these three structural properties into a single deployment-time algorithm, Tunneling-Aware Compensation (TAC), that combines closed-form mean correction with an optimal layer-adaptive bit-budget allocation derived from the WKB variance decomposition. Across four convolutional architectures at $p_\mathrm{flip}$ =0.10 and a transformer encoder at $p_\mathrm{flip}$ =0.05, TAC reaches $95\%$ of clean accuracy with 3.4 $\times$ to 33.6 $\times$ less ECC overhead than Uniform-MSP, the natural baseline derived from the same physics. The closed-form saturation ratio $ρ^*$ predicts these gains in advance, and on heterogeneous architectures WKB-derived scoring outperforms magnitude-based allocation by up to 24 percentage points at small budgets. The algorithm requires no retraining, no labels, and no inference-time overhead. We also verify the WKB-derived distributional theorems to Monte Carlo precision. These results connect WKB tunneling physics with noise-aware deep learning and suggest a principled path toward hardware--software co-design beyond conventional scaling limits.

Explore similar work

Apr 5, 2025quant-ph

Quantum Adaptive Self-Attention for Quantum Transformer Models

A recurring weakness in quantum machine learning (QML) is that reported ``quantum advantages'' are seldom tested against a \emph{capacity-matched} classical control, leaving it unclear whether a gain comes from the quantum substrate or from the architectural change that accompanies it. Our primary contribution is methodological: a protocol for attributing such gains honestly -- a capacity-matched classical bottleneck of identical parameter budget, transparent reporting of where quantum does \emph{not} help, and validation on real quantum hardware -- which we develop and apply through a concrete case study. That case study is Quantum Adaptive Self-Attention (QASA), a hybrid Transformer that replaces the value projection of a \emph{single} encoder layer with a 36-parameter parameterized quantum circuit (PQC), keeping all other layers classical. Across nine synthetic benchmarks and the real-world ETTh1 dataset, QASA improves on a full-capacity classical Transformer for chaotic and trend-dominated signals. To ask whether this is a genuinely \emph{quantum} effect, we introduce a control rarely applied in quantum machine learning -- a capacity-matched classical bottleneck with the same parameter budget -- and find that it matches the PQC on the error metrics. The gain is therefore attributable to the low-rank value-projection \emph{bottleneck} (an \emph{architectural parsimony} principle), not to quantumness; adding further quantum layers only degrades performance and trainability. We accordingly position the quantum layer not as a source of accuracy advantage but as a \emph{competitive} instantiation of this principle: its low-rank compression onto the signal's intrinsic dimensionality is matched by a classical bottleneck, so the gain is architectural rather than quantum.

Chi-Sheng Chen, En-Jui Kuo

Quantum Concept Bottleneck Models

Ask PDF

Apr 27, 2026quant-ph

Few-Shot Cross-Device Transfer for Quantum Noise Modeling on Real Hardware

In the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) regime, quantum devices contain hardware-specific noise sources which restrict device-invariant error mitigation strategies. We explore transfer learning approaches to apply noise models learned on one quantum device to a different device with the help of a small amount of data. We create a real-hardware dataset from two IBM quantum devices, ibm_fez (source) and ibm_marrakesh (target), comprising 170 noisy and ideal circuit output distributions, with device calibration features added. We train a residual neural network on the source device to map noisy to ideal outcomes. The zero-shot transfer test shows a KL divergence of 1.6706 (up from 0.3014), establishing device specificity. With K = 20 fine-tuning samples, KL drops to 1.1924 (28.6% improvement over zero-shot), recovering 34.9% of the gap between zero-shot and in-domain KL. Ablation studies reveal that the major cause of mismatches across devices is CX gate error, followed by readout error. The results show quantum noise can be learned and fine-tuned with minimal samples, and provide a plausible approach to cross-device quantum error mitigation.

Sahil Al Farib, Sheikh Redwanul Islam, Azizur Rahman Anik

Quantum Error Correction Transfer Learning Noise-Aware

Ask PDF

Apr 27, 2026quant-ph

Do Quantum Transformers Help? A Systematic VQC Architecture Comparison on Tabular Benchmarks

Variational quantum circuits (VQCs) are a leading approach to quantum machine learning on near-term devices, yet it remains unclear which circuit architecture yields the best accuracy-parameter trade-off on classical tabular data. We present a systematic empirical comparison of four VQC families -- multi-layer fully-connected (FC-VQC), residual (ResNet-VQC), hybrid quantum-classical transformer (QT), and fully quantum transformer (FQT) -- across five regression and classification benchmarks. Our key findings are: \textbf{(i)}~FC-VQCs achieve 90-96% of the

R^2

of attention-based VQCs while using 40-50% fewer parameters, and consistently outperform equal-capacity MLPs (mean

R^2{=}0.829

vs.\ MLP

_{720}

0.753

on Boston Housing, 3-seed average); \textbf{(ii)}~~FC-VQC's Type~~4 inter-block connectivity provides partial cross-token mixing that approximates the role of attention -- explicit quantum self-attention yields only marginal gains on most datasets while significantly increasing parameter count; \textbf{(iii)}~~expressibility saturates at circuit depth~~

{\approx}\,3

, explaining why shallow VQCs already cover the Hilbert space effectively; \textbf{(iv)}~LayerNorm on the fully quantum transformer improves classification accuracy, suggesting normalization is important when all operations are quantum; \textbf{(v)}~in our noise study on Boston Housing, FQT degrades gracefully under depolarizing noise while QT collapses. All results are validated across three random seeds. These findings provide practical architectural guidance for deploying VQCs on near-term quantum hardware.

Chi-Sheng Chen, En-Jui Kuo

Variational Quantum Circuits Variational Encoder

Ask PDF