Multi-Task Crack Foundation Model for Engineering-Reliable Crack Representation and Topology Preservation in Civil Infrastructure

Recent crack segmentation methods often follow generic semantic segmentation designs, using stronger backbones, hybrid CNN-Transformer-Mamba encoders, and auxiliary enhancement branches. Although effective, this raises whether stronger generic feature mixing is the most suitable direction for crack segmentation. We instead formulate crack segmentation as sparse structural recovery. Cracks have limited category-level semantics but strong morphological regularities, being thin, sparse, anisotropic, locally fragmented, and easily confused with textures or shadows. Thus, the key bottleneck lies in preserving weak structural evidence, recovering directional continuity, and suppressing background coupling. We propose RIFT, a compact family of morphology-aligned crack segmentation models. Rather than compressing a complex generic architecture, RIFT is simple by design, preserving local evidence, aggregating cooperative directional continuity, and restoring crack structures through lightweight multi-scale fusion. Experiments on four public benchmarks show that RIFT achieves the best or tied-best results across the 16 main metrics against reproduced representative baselines. RIFT-B gives the strongest overall accuracy, while RIFT-T provides the best deployment efficiency with only 0.47M parameters and high inference speed. Topology-aware evaluation, ablations, transfer experiments, and visualizations further verify that task-aligned simplicity can match or surpass complex hybrid architectures when its inductive bias fits crack morphology. Code: https://github.com/xauat-liushipeng/RIFT

Crack segmentation is essential for infrastructure inspection and structural health assessment, but existing high-performance methods typically require task-specific pixel-level annotations and training. Text-promptable vision foundation models enable zero-shot deployment, yet their final mask proposals are poorly suited to thin, fragmented, and low-contrast cracks, whose evidence may be suppressed, truncated, or over-expanded during mask generation. We find that language-conditioned semantic responses within the SAM3 decoder preserve more continuous and complete crack evidence than its final masks. Based on this observation, we propose Semantic-Edge Response Decoding (SERD), which interprets internal responses as a dense crack-likelihood field, calibrates them with a lightweight edge prior, and generates crack masks using a unified global threshold, without annotation or fine-tuning. Experiments on six public datasets show that SERD consistently improves over native SAM3 and outperforms the compared zero-shot and open-vocabulary segmentation methods, achieving an average Crack IoU of 61.14%, 4.63 points higher than SAM3. Further analyses show that most gains arise from directly decoding internal semantic responses, while edge calibration improves structural recovery and false-positive control without increasing end-to-end inference overhead. These results suggest that, for thin and non-compact targets, internal continuous responses can provide a more transferable interface than the final masks of foundation models. Code is available at: https://github.com/xauat-liushipeng/SERD

Automated structural health monitoring is essential to prevent catastrophic infrastructure failures. Precise, pixel-level defect segmentation is needed to accurately assess structural integrity, but progress in defect segmentation for civil infrastructures has been held back by an extreme scarcity of data, which requires costly expert annotation. The need for data is accentuated by algorithmic hurdles intrinsic to the problem, including center-bias and the need to rely more on shape when inspecting nearly textureless building materials. To remove the bottleneck, we introduce Cracks in the Foundation (CiF), the largest and most detailed civil infrastructure (instance) segmentation dataset to date, comprising $\approx$150,000 high-resolution images meticulously curated over five years in collaboration with civil engineering experts. With the help of this unprecedented data source, we expose a blind spot of current visual AI: despite the advent of promptable Foundation Models (FMs) and Vision Language Models (VLMs), and despite the impressive abilities of today's specialised segmentation models, it turns out that dense image understanding in the built environment is nowhere near solved. Our evaluations indicate that even the most recent zero-shot FMs face significant challenges when deployed on real-world infrastructure and even the performance of specialised models with domain-specific supervision plateaus at $\approx$25% mAP. CiF establishes inspection of civil infrastructure, an elementary and seemingly easy perceptual task, as an open challenge that reveals fundamental weaknesses of present-day models trained predominantly on internet images, literally and figuratively highlighting cracks in the current foundation model paradigm.