How abundant are good interpolators?

A central problem in machine learning is that models can achieve near-perfect training performance while generalizing substantially less well to unseen examples. This gap is especially acute in high-dimensional, low-sample regimes, where many interpolating solutions exist and optimization must implicitly select among minima with different generalization properties. Following recent theoretical advances on optimization dynamics near the interpolation threshold, we note that the two-regime structure of risk minimization, with loss minimization followed by complexity minimization, motivates a biphasic optimization schedule. We thus theoretically demonstrate that GROKtimizer, a biphasic strategy that combines rapid convergence to interpolation with Critically Damped Momentum (CDM)-based post-interpolation norm minimization, offers a natural solution for selecting low-norm interpolating solutions. Under a local quadratic model of the post-interpolation basin, GROKtimizer provides a quadratic speedup over classical gradient descent, with provable optimality among first-order optimizers. To showcase the applicability of our method, we evaluate GROKtimizer on several synthetic benchmarks common in the classical grokking literature and on various real-world datasets. Finally, we reconcile our findings with the flat-minima hypothesis, highlighting the importance of post-interpolation dynamics in the construction of high-quality, generalizing models.

Contemporary deep learning methods generalize well even when they fit their training data perfectly, a phenomenon known as benign interpolation. This phenomenon cannot be accounted for by classical statistical learning theory and has prompted a range of attempted new explanations in the statistics and machine learning literature. A common feature of these new proposals is an appeal to a simplicity preference among interpolating models, often presented as a form of Occam's razor. We clarify this debate for a philosophical audience and argue that this new appeal to simplicity creates an explanatory gap. The classical theory offers theorems which connect the simplicity of model classes to good generalization, thus underwriting methodological simplicity norms. The new accounts instead appeal to properties of individual models, which they interpret as a kind of simplicity. Lacking a provable connection to generalization, it is the name "simplicity" that does the work a theorem used to do, making a substantive and unargued assumption look like the application of a familiar methodological principle.

This paper establishes the generalization error of pooled min-$\ell_2$-norm interpolation in transfer learning, where data from diverse distributions are available. Min-norm interpolators arise naturally as implicit regularized limits of modern machine learning algorithms. Prior work has characterized their out-of-distribution risk when samples from the test distribution are unavailable during training. In many applications, however, limited test samples may be available at training time, yet properties of min-norm interpolation in this regime remain poorly understood. We address this gap by characterizing the bias and variance of pooled min-$\ell_2$-norm interpolation under both covariate shift and model shift. Our results yield several important implications. In certain cases under model shift, we show that adding data always hurts when the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is low. At higher SNR levels, transfer learning is beneficial provided the shift-to-signal ratio falls below a threshold that we characterize explicitly. Under covariate shift, we find that when the source sample size is small relative to the dimension, greater heterogeneity between domains reduces risk, and vice versa. While our model shift results are initially established for Gaussian designs, we extend them to more general designs through a universality argument. To illustrate the broader applicability of our technical tools beyond interpolation learning, we characterize the risk of a bias-corrected estimator that uses the pooled interpolator as an initialization and corrects the resulting bias with target data. On the technical side, we develop a novel anisotropic local law and a Lindeberg-swapping argument, yielding tools that may be of independent interest in random matrix theory and universality analysis. Finally, we supplement our theory with simulations demonstrating the finite-sample efficacy of our results.