Constrained Paraphrase Consistency for LLM Hallucination Detection

The reliability of Large Language Models (LLMs) is often compromised by factual inconsistencies, including hallucinations---cases where generated content is not supported by the underlying source. We present HallDetect, a lightweight, reference-free, and black-box framework for hallucination detection that we evaluate not only on summarization but across a broader range of source-grounded generation settings. HallDetect builds on decomposition-based factuality evaluation: generated content is decomposed into atomic claims, each verified by a compact encoder-based entailment model through a contrastive formulation over a multi-scale library of source chunks, and aggregated with an asymmetric score in which a single confidently contradicted claim flags the response. Under a controlled protocol in which all methods share the same 4-bit quantized backbones and consumer-grade hardware budget, HallDetect outperforms comparably resourced generative and embedding-based baselines on three of four benchmarks while remaining stable across backbone families, and yields a claim-to-span audit trail that localizes each error.

Large language models (LLMs) frequently generate hallucinations, which are unsupported by a source document. To avoid costly LLM-as-evaluator pipelines and the heavy annotation demands of existing classifiers, we propose CPIL (Cross Paraphrastic Invariance Learning), a two-stage Siamese framework that maximizes the utility of existing labeled data. Concretely, CPIL constructs informative training pairs by: (i) generating paraphrastic views of each document-claim example as positives, and explicitly aligning their representations to enforce invariance to surface form; and (ii) mining same-document, opposite-label pairs as hard negatives to sharpen document-sensitive decision boundaries. Then CPIL conduct a two-stage model training: Stage 1 performs contrastive pretraining to learn a paraphrase-invariant, grounding-aware embedding space; and Stage 2 attaches a lightweight classifier for binary groundedness. On the LLM-AggreFact benchmark (11 tasks), CPIL surpasses strong baselines concerning F1 scores with only ~1% labeled data, showing its prediction superiority and label efficiency.

Large language models (LLMs) hallucinate with confidence: their outputs can be fluent, authoritative, and simply wrong. In medical, legal, and scientific applications this failure causes direct harm, and detecting it from internal model states offers a path to safer deployment. A growing body of work reports that this problem is increasingly tractable, with recent methods achieving high detection performance on widely used benchmarks. We show, however, that much of this apparent progress does not survive scrutiny. Four of the six corpora embed the ground-truth answer directly in the input prompt. A naïve text-similarity baseline we call \textsc{TxTemb} exploits this to achieve near-perfect detection scores without any access to model internals. To measure what genuine detection capability remains once these artifacts are controlled, we conduct a large-scale evaluation spanning twenty-two detection methods, twelve open-source models spanning six architectural families, and six corpora. We further introduce \textbf{DRIFT}, a supervised probe over inter-layer hidden-state transitions, as a point of comparison for live-generation detection. Our findings suggest that the field's reported progress on hallucination detection is substantially explained by benchmark construction artifacts in widely used corpora, and that the majority of established baselines perform near chance under controlled conditions; the consistent exceptions are SAPLMA and DRIFT, both supervised probes on upper-layer hidden states.