STAR-KV: Low-Rank KV Cache Compression via Soft Thresholding for Adaptive Rank Control

The key-value (KV) cache has become the dominant memory cost of transformer inference. It grows with batch size, context length, and depth, and at long context it, rather than the model weights, sets the ceiling on throughput. Two families of methods reduce it. Low-rank methods factor two-dimensional slices of the cache, either per-head matrices or cross-layer feature blocks, and quantization methods lower the bit-width of every entry. Neither family exploits the fact that the cache at a layer is naturally a third-order tensor whose three axes, the heads, the tokens, and the features, carry very different amounts of redundancy. We take this tensor view directly. Our method, JoLT, applies a partial Tucker decomposition that compresses only the token and feature axes while leaving the head and layer axes intact, and then restores the energy that truncation discards with a Johnson-Lindenstrauss (JL) rotated low-bit residual. A single Lagrangian dual allocates the Tucker ranks and the residual bit-widths together, per layer group and separately for keys and values, under one byte budget. The result is a near-lossless 2-3x compression: perplexity, GSM8K accuracy, and RULER needle-in-a-haystack retrieval all stay at or within statistical noise of the uncompressed baseline on both a grouped-query-attention model (Mistral-7B-v0.3) and a multi-head-attention model (LLaMA-2-13B). At 2x, JoLT reconstructs the cache to relative Frobenius error 0.009 (K) and 0.006 (V) on both architectures, roughly an order of magnitude below cross-layer SVD and 4-bit quantization. A randomized-SVD variant, FlashJoLT, delivers a 5-13x compression-time speedup at matched quality.

As the inference phase of Large Language Models (LLMs) requires handling long context windows, the Key-Value (KV) cache initially appears to address this challenge but eventually becomes a significant bottleneck as the context window continues to grow. Low-rank compression has recently been studied as an effective approach to reduce KV cache memory while maintaining model performance. However, only a few existing methods treat the Key and Value caches differently, despite their distinct roles. Moreover, these methods typically employ fixed attention-head grouping, which may not fully exploit the structural similarity among attention heads. In this paper, we propose an improved low-rank KV cache compression framework. For the Key cache, we dynamically group attention heads based on Centered Kernel Alignment (CKA) similarity and allocate the rank budget adaptively under a parameter budget. For the Value cache, we adopt the same approach as ReCalKV, refining the low-rank decomposition through offline calibration to improve reconstruction quality. Experimental results on three instruction-tuned LLMs show that our method reduces the number of Key cache parameters while maintaining competitive accuracy. We further observe that the proposed strategy is particularly effective for Multi-Head Attention (MHA) models, whereas it should be applied more conservatively to Grouped-Query Attention (GQA) models, especially in long-context settings.

Rank reduction discards dimensions; quantization keeps them at lower precision. Comparing the two requires a choice of what compression should preserve. For attention values, we study reconstruction of the attention output rather than reconstruction of the values alone. With fixed attention weights, the optimal orthogonal rank-$r$ projection uses the leading eigenvectors of $V^\topα^\topαV$, and its error is exactly the discarded eigenvalue sum. We extend this objective to calibration datasets and grouped query attention, and describe rank allocation under an additive local error budget. We also examine the limits of using local error to predict downstream loss. Historical weight-perturbation experiments favor coefficient rounding over the value projections tested, but do not establish a comparison at equal cache storage. The resulting distinction is practical: the projection objective has an exact solution, while a comparison with cache quantization requires separate activation-level experiments.