A Geometric Measure of Linear Separability for Neural Representations

Activation-alignment measures such as Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA), Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA), and Centered Kernel Alignment (CKA) are widely used to compare biological and artificial neural representations. Recent theoretical work interprets many of these methods as assessing agreement between optimal linear readouts over broad families of global tasks. However, agreement at the level of global readouts does not determine how a system uses local stimulus evidence. Specifically, representations may align in activation space yet differ in their sensitivity to small perturbations. To address this challenge, we introduce a complementary framework based on local decodable information, which focuses on a representation's ability, under noise, to discriminate small perturbations within a specified stimulus-coordinate subspace. Building on Fisher information and local representation geometry, we summarize each representation using the expected projected pullback/Fisher metric over that subspace. This formulation induces a second-moment family of local discrimination tasks, for which the resulting operator provides a minimal, complete dataset-level summary of expected discriminability. We compare these regularized signatures using a log-spectral distance on the manifold of symmetric positive definite (SPD) matrices, yielding the Spectral Riemannian Alignment Score (S-RAS) and a uniform multiplicative certificate over the corresponding family of lifted task values. Empirically, this framework enables the recovery of corresponding layers across independently trained artificial neural networks, supports transferable class-conditional probes, reveals controlled dissociations between standard and robust training, and uncovers stimulus-coordinate family effects across mouse visual cortex using the Allen Brain Observatory static gratings dataset.

Over the past decade, deep learning has proven to be a highly effective tool for learning meaningful features from raw data. However, it remains an open question how deep networks perform hierarchical feature learning across layers. In this work, we attempt to unveil this mystery by investigating the structures of intermediate features. Motivated by our empirical findings that linear layers mimic the roles of deep layers in nonlinear networks for feature learning, we explore how deep linear networks transform input data into output by investigating the output (i.e., features) of each layer after training in the context of multi-class classification problems. Toward this goal, we first define metrics to measure within-class compression and between-class discrimination of intermediate features, respectively. Through theoretical analysis of these two metrics, we show that the evolution of features follows a simple and quantitative pattern from shallow to deep layers when the input data is nearly orthogonal and the network weights are minimum-norm, balanced, and approximate low-rank: Each layer of the linear network progressively compresses within-class features at a geometric rate and discriminates between-class features at a linear rate with respect to the number of layers that data have passed through. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first quantitative characterization of feature evolution in hierarchical representations of deep linear networks. Empirically, our extensive experiments not only validate our theoretical results numerically but also reveal a similar pattern in deep nonlinear networks which aligns well with recent empirical studies. Moreover, we demonstrate the practical implications of our results in transfer learning. Our code is available at https://github.com/Heimine/PNC_DLN.

Neural networks can leverage feature superposition to encode more concepts than dimensions, but cross-feature interference constrains the linear accessibility of simultaneously active features. By framing linear accessibility as a compressed sensing problem, we derive high-probability bounds for fixed supports under subgaussian noise, proving the sufficient dimension scales linearly ($d=O_{\varepsilon}(k \log m)$) rather than prior worst-case quadratic limits. We then validate these bounds across system parameters through Gaussian-tail approximations. These results quantify the geometric constraints of the linear representation hypothesis, providing a framework for evaluating sparse autoencoders, compositional generalization, and neural interpretability.