Zero-Shot Semantic Re-Identification for Autonomous Driving: A VLM Baseline Study

Spatiotemporal intelligence in autonomous driving (AD) requires an agent to integrate multi-view observations into a coherent scene representation, maintain object continuity across viewpoints and time, and reason about spatial relations, interactions, and future dynamics. However, existing AD vision-language benchmarks largely focus on single-view, static, ego-centric, or single-source question answering, leaving it unclear whether current Vision-Language Models (VLMs) can truly construct and reason over dynamic driving scenes. We introduce DriveSpatial, a benchmark of 15.6K human-verified QA pairs across 20 tasks from five large-scale AD datasets. DriveSpatial evaluates four abilities: Cognitive Scene Construction, Multi-view Relational Understanding, Temporal Reasoning, and Generalization. Unlike prior benchmarks, DriveSpatial is generated from a dynamic multi-relational scene graph that encodes object states, spatial relations, interactions, camera visibility, and temporal correspondences, enabling QA pairs that enforce genuine cross-view and spatiotemporal reasoning. Evaluating 15 representative VLMs reveals a substantial human-model gap: the strongest model trails humans by 28.4 points, with Cognitive Scene Construction emerging as the key bottleneck. Further diagnostics show that language-only prompting is insufficient, while explicit BEV grounding consistently improves performance. These results suggest that current VLMs lack the scene-construction ability needed for reliable spatiotemporal driving intelligence. DriveSpatial and its construction pipeline will be released to support future research.

End-to-end (E2E) autonomous driving aims to learn a direct mapping from visual observations to control actions. However, these E2E models often act as black boxes and struggle with complex scenarios. To address this, recent works incorporate Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to provide explicit reasoning, enhancing both interpretability and driving robustness. These approaches typically rely on pre-generated annotations, which suffer from potentially flawed labels and require costly human labor. In this work, we propose a new framework that integrates structured reasoning and geometric precision through a teacher-student architecture. The teacher model introduces reflective reasoning, where the VLM generates logical explanations and then reflectively refines the reasoning under the supervision of ground-truth action. This enhances zero-shot generalization without intermediate labels. The student model distills the teacher's reasoning capabilities via supervised fine-tuning. We also design a separate waypoint decoder that interprets textual reasoning into continuous trajectories. Our proposed solution integrates two goals: providing explicit reasoning for interpretability and delivering robust and accurate driving performance. It leverages the synergy between these two objectives within a staged inference engine to enhance driving performance and explicitly uses the reasoning to guide driving prediction. Evaluated on Waymo benchmarks, our framework outperforms classical reasoning-based baselines in zero-shot reasoning, waypoint accuracy, and inference efficiency. Our experiments validate this design, demonstrating that the reasoning text makes a significant contribution to driving inference, resulting in around a 24% improvement in performance compared to an identical model that lacks reasoning. Our work advances reasoning-driven autonomous driving toward interpretable and deployable systems.

Rapid advances in vision-language models (VLMs) have generated growing interest in their application to autonomous driving. A prevailing assumption is that successive VLM generations will continually improve driving performance and eventually outperform state-of-the-art methods. To systematically examine this assumption, we introduce LightEMMA, a longitudinal framework for evaluating the autonomous driving performance of VLMs. LightEMMA uses a lightweight, unified evaluation protocol that assesses each model's intrinsic driving capability without model-specific fine-tuning, architectural changes, or prompt engineering. Using this protocol, we evaluate 15 models from five major families on the challenging nuScenes prediction benchmark. Empirical findings show that, despite increased model scale and enhanced general reasoning capabilities, successive VLM generations do not consistently achieve better driving performance. Further analysis of driving scenarios reveals recurring failure modes, including overreliance on historical actions and difficulty reconciling conflicting visual cues. These findings highlight the need for domain-specific adaptation to improve the safety of VLM-based autonomous driving systems. The source code is available at https://github.com/michigan-traffic-lab/LightEMMA.