In modern educational systems, Automatic Text Scoring (ATS) plays a central role by enabling scalable and consistent evaluation of learner responses without human intervention. Recently, the increased accessibility of LLMs and Arabic-specific datasets has sparked renewed interest in this area. In this work, we investigate LLM-Based approaches for the automated evaluation of Arabic texts, focusing on both short answer grading (ASAG) and essay scoring (AES). We further introduce a structured taxonomy comprising five dimensions: application domain, feedback generation capability, LLM architecture deployed, alignment with competency referential frameworks, and prompt engineering strategy. By applying this taxonomy, we conduct a comparative analysis of existing studies, examining their methodological approaches, datasets, evaluation metrics, and reported performance. The findings highlight the need for sustained and pedagogically grounded research efforts in Arabic ATS, given its significance for improving educational quality across Arabic-speaking communities.
Figures & tables
Aspect
Short Answer Scoring (ASAG)
Essay Scoring (AES)
Text Length
Brief (sentences/paragraphs)
Extended (multi-paragraph)
Key Focus
Content accuracy, keyword overlap
Coherence, style, development
Challenges
Domain-specific meaning
Subjectivity in creativity
Table 1: Comparison between Short Answer Scoring (ASAG) and Essay Scoring (AES)
Figure 1: The Proposed Taxonomy for ATS frameworks.
Dataset
Language
Annotation
Size
# Prompts
Trait-Specific Score
Linguistic Annotation
CEFR
Arabic Essay Scoring
ZAEBUC ( Habash and Palfreyman, 2022 )
Bilingual (AR–EN)
Manual
214 essays
3
×
✓(POS, morph, lemma)
A2–C1
QAES ( Bashendy et al., 2024 )
Arabic
Manual
195 essays
2
✓(7 traits)
×
×
ZaQQ ( Elsayed et al., 2025 )
Arabic
Manual & Automatic
1021 essays
5
✓
×
×
AR-AES ( Ghazawi and Simpson, 2024 )
Arabic
Manual
2046 essays
12
×
×
×
TAQEEM ( Bashendy et al., 2025a )
Arabic
Manual
1,265 essays
Multiple
✓
×
×
Table 2: Comparison of Arabic ATS Datasets
Approach
Application Domain
Feedback Generation
LLM / Model
Competency Framework
Prompt Engineering
Score
Nael et al. (2022)
General (ASAP-SAS)
✗
AraBERT, ELECTRA, Bi-LSTM, RNN
✗
✗
QWK = 0.78
Badry et al. (2023)
Cybercrime Course (AR-ASAG)
✗
Local weight-based LSA
✗
✗
F1 = 82.82%
Soulimani et al. (2024)
Islamic Edu. (Moroccan pupils)
✗
AraBERT, LSTM
✗
✗
Acc = 71.31%
Noaman et al. (2025)
Cybercrime Course (AR-ASAG)
✗
AraBERT (Siamese network)
✗
✗
Pearson = 0.79
Nabil et al. (2025)
Science (ESD)
✓
GPT-4, Llama 3, DeepSeek-V3
✗
✓
QWK = 0.83
Table 3: Comparison of LLM-Based Arabic Automated Short Answer Grading (ASAG) Approaches
This paper presents a novel prompt engineering framework for trait specific Automatic Essay Scoring (AES) in Arabic, leveraging large language models (LLMs) under zero-shot and few-shot configurations. Addressing the scarcity of scalable, linguistically informed AES tools for Arabic, we introduce a three-tier prompting strategy (standard, hybrid, and rubric-guided) that guides LLMs in evaluating distinct language proficiency traits such as organization, vocabulary, development, and style. The hybrid approach simulates multi-agent evaluation with trait specialist raters, while the rubric-guided method incorporates scored exemplars to enhance model alignment. In zero and few-shot settings, we evaluate eight LLMs on the QAES dataset, the first publicly available Arabic AES resource with trait level annotations. Experimental results using Quadratic Weighted Kappa (QWK) and Confidence Intervals show that Fanar-1-9B-Instruct achieves the highest trait level agreement in both zero and few-shot prompting (QWK = 0.28 and CI = 0.41), with rubric-guided prompting yielding consistent gains across all traits and models. Discourse-level traits such as Development and Style showed the greatest improvements. These findings confirm that structured prompting, not model scale alone, enables effective AES in Arabic. Our study presents the first comprehensive framework for proficiency oriented Arabic AES and sets the foundation for scalable assessment in low resource educational contexts.
Over the past years, Automated Essay Scoring (AES) systems have gained increasing attention as scalable and consistent solutions for assessing the proficiency of student writing. Despite recent progress, support for Arabic AES remains limited due to linguistic complexity and scarcity of large publicly-available annotated datasets. In this work, we present Qayyem, a Web-based platform designed to support Arabic AES by providing an integrated workflow for assignment creation, batch essay upload, scoring configuration, and per-trait essay evaluation. Qayyem abstracts the technical complexity of interacting with scoring server APIs, allowing instructors to access advanced scoring services through a user-friendly interface. The platform deploys a number of state-of-the-art Arabic essay scoring models with different effectiveness and efficiency figures.
Automated Essay Scoring (AES) has been explored for decades with the goal to support teachers by reducing grading workload and mitigating subjective biases. While early systems relied on handcrafted features and statistical models, recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have made it possible to evaluate student writing with unprecedented flexibility. This paper investigates the application of state-of-the-art open-weight LLMs for the grading of Austrian A-level German texts, with a particular focus on rubric-based evaluation. A dataset of 101 anonymised student exams across three text types was processed and evaluated. Four LLMs, DeepSeek-R1 32b, Qwen3 30b, Mixtral 8x7b and LLama3.3 70b, were evaluated with different contexts and prompting strategies. The LLMs were able to reach a maximum of 40.6% agreement with the human rater in the rubric-provided sub-dimensions, and only 32.8% of final grades matched the ones given by a human expert. The results indicate that even though smaller models are able to use standardised rubrics for German essay grading, they are not accurate enough to be used in a real-world grading environment.
Jonas Kubesch, Lena Huber, Clemens Havas
Salzburg University of Applied Sciences, Salzburg, Austria