Does Normalization Choice Matter for Causal Large Time-Series Models?

Time-series forecasting research has been moving steadily toward larger architectures, from specialized transformers to general-purpose foundation models, on the assumption that capacity is what unlocks accuracy. We take the opposite position: most of the gap can be closed at far lower cost by tuning preprocessing rather than scaling models. We use Ridge regression as the testbed, since it has a closed-form solution and interpretable weights, which let the optimal hyperparameters be read off the search directly. We search over context length, local normalization, regularization, and augmentation on eight standard benchmarks and find three patterns. (1) Optimal lookback is strongly series-specific and often non-monotonic in forecast horizon, with fitted power-law exponents ranging from $+0.46$ on ETTm2 to $-0.19$ on Exchange and Traffic, challenging the convention that longer horizons need longer history. (2) Normalizing over a learned trailing fraction of the context, rather than its entirety, is almost universally preferred. (3) Series within the same dataset often disagree on hyperparameters; the optimal degree of cross-series sharing varies from fully shared to fully per-series. The resulting models beat prior linear forecasters on most dataset-horizon entries and exceed Transformer, MLP, and CNN baselines on six of eight benchmarks. The optimized hyperparameters also serve as a diagnostic on the data itself, revealing structures that larger models absorb silently into their learned parameters. We provide an accompanying interactive online demonstration and the code at https://sakanaai.github.io/SearchCast/.

Reversible instance normalization (RevIN) and its successors (Dish-TS, SAN, FAN) have become the de facto plug-in for time-series forecasting, yet the map they apply to each data point is strictly affine, $x \mapsto ax+b$, so they cannot reshape the underlying distribution -- heavy tails remain heavy and skewness remains uncorrected. We propose NoRIN, a non-linear reversible normalization based on the arcsinh-form Johnson $S_U$ transform with two shape parameters $(δ,\varepsilon)$ that control tailedness and skewness; the linear $Z$-score used by RevIN is recovered only in the limit $δ\to \infty$. Training $(δ,\varepsilon)$ jointly with the backbone via gradient descent reliably pushes them toward this linear limit within a few epochs -- a phenomenon we name the degeneration problem: the forecasting loss is locally indifferent to shape, and the high-capacity backbone compensates for any monotone reparameterization of its input. NoRIN escapes the degeneration by decoupling shape selection from gradient training: $(δ,\varepsilon)$ are initialized by a closed-form Slifker-Shapiro quantile fit and refined by Bayesian optimization on the validation objective, while the inner training loop is identical to standard RevIN-style training. Across six representative backbones x five real-world datasets x three prediction horizons (90 configurations), decoupled shape optimization recovers $(δ^\star,\varepsilon^\star)$ that sit systematically far from the linear limit, with values that vary in a backbone-dependent way. This empirically supports the central thesis: different backbones genuinely require different normalization parameters to reach their best performance.

Transformer architectures have been widely adopted for time series forecasting, yet whether the representational mechanisms that make them powerful in NLP actually engage on time series data remains unexplored. The persistent competitiveness of simple linear models such as DLinear has fueled ongoing debate, but no mechanistic explanation for this phenomenon has been offered. We address this gap by applying sparse autoencoders (SAEs), a tool from mechanistic interpretability, to probe the internal representations of PatchTST. We first establish that a single-layer, narrow-dimensional transformer matches the forecasting performance of deeper configurations across commonly used benchmarks. We then train SAEs on the post-GELU intermediate FFN activations with dictionary sizes ranging from 0.5x to 4.0x the native dimensionality. Expanding the dictionary yields negligible downstream performance change (average 0.214%), with large portions of overcomplete dictionaries remaining inactive. Targeted causal interventions on dominant latent features produce minimal forecast perturbation. Across all evaluated settings, we observe no empirical evidence that the analyzed FFN representations rely on strong superposition. Instead, the representations remain sparse, stable under aggressive dictionary expansion, and largely insensitive to latent interventions. These results demonstrate that superposition is not necessary for competitive performance on standard forecasting benchmarks, suggesting they may not demand the rich compositional representations that drive transformer success in language modeling, and helping explain the persistent competitiveness of simple linear models