Hyperbolic Neural Population Geometry Benefits Computation

Associative memory, traditionally modeled by Hopfield networks, enables the retrieval of previously stored patterns from partial or noisy cues. Yet, the local computational principles which are required to enable this function remain incompletely understood. To formally characterize the local information processing in such systems, we employ a recent extension of information theory -- Partial Information Decomposition (PID). PID decomposes the contribution of different inputs to an output into unique information from each input, redundant information across inputs, and synergistic information that emerges from combining different inputs. Applying this framework to individual neurons in classical Hopfield networks we find that below the memory capacity, the information in a neuron's activity is characterized by high redundancy between the external pattern input and the internal recurrent input, while synergy and unique information are close to zero until the memory capacity is surpassed and performance drops steeply. Inspired by this observation, we use redundancy maximization at each neuron as an information-theoretic learning goal. This dramatically increases the network's memory capacity to 1.59, a more than tenfold improvement over the 0.14 capacity of classical Hopfield networks, and also outperforming recent state-of-the-art implementations of Hopfield networks. Overall, this work establishes redundancy maximization as a new design principle for associative memories and opens pathways for new associative memory models based on information-theoretic goals.

Generalized Hopfield networks are introduced where memories and neurons are continuous variables that lie on a Riemannian manifold. We explicitly focus on symmetric spaces associated with the special unitary groups SU(d), and use both numerical and analytical (replica) techniques to demonstrate an almost order of magnitude enhancement in critical capacity over the vector networks starting with d=3 and further rapidly growing with d. To circumvent the non-linear geometric constraints, we use a Lie algebraic method [following V. Galitski, Phys. Rev. A 84, 012118 (2011)] to exactly describe the classical neural network in terms of linear algebra in an auxiliary Hilbert space. It is shown that in contrast to the traditional Hopfield networks, memory recall in SU(d) Hopfields corresponds to neuron alignment along a top eigenvector of a spiked matrix, which is less susceptible to random matrix crosstalk than other models with continuous neuron variables. Physical platforms to realize SU(d) Hopfields are briefly discussed and physical (in addition to algorithmic) recall mechanism is demonstrated, where memory recovery occurs naturally through generalized Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert dynamics. To illustrate SU(3) memory recall, we introduce a color (RGB) image encoding/decoding protocol and explicitly run image recovery on corrupted cues. Finally, we quantize the generalized Hopfields which are shown to reduce to Sachdev-Ye glassy type of models. Their many-body spectra generally feature two types of dark and memory bands, where the latter exhibits chaotic Wigner-Dyson level statistics that hides Hebbian data.

We present a biologically detailed extension of the classical Hopfield/Marr auto-associative memory model for CA3, implementing ten populations (two asymmetric pyramidal subtypes, eight GABAergic interneuron classes), forty-seven compartments, multi-rule plasticity (recurrent Hebb, BCM anti-saturation, mossy-fiber short-term, endocannabinoid iLTD, burst-gated Hebb), and a bimodal cholinergic encoding/consolidation cycle. Evaluated on pattern completion across auto-associative, associative, and temporal regimes, and on a controlled inhibitory-proportion manipulation at $N{=}256$, the full architecture exhibits \emph{three qualitative signatures absent from a minimal Hopfield baseline}: (i)~multi-attractor cross-seed behaviour at $K{=}5$ with biologically realistic inhibitory proportions, where two of five seeds converge to positive attractors with margin ${+}0.10{-}0.22$ (Cohen's $d{=}0.71$, one-sided $p{=}0.08$); (ii)~target-selective associative recall in paired $(A, B)$ memory at $K{\geq}5$, where the full model retrieves $B$ from a partial cue of $A$ while the minimal model echoes $A$ (Pearson margin $Δ{=}{+}0.163$ at $K{=}5$); (iii)~reduced cross-seed variance of the full model below the minimal baseline under clean upstream, with ratios $1.0{-}3.0$. These three signatures are architecture-specific: they appear consistently across independent regimes and are absent from the minimal control.