cs.LGJun 10, 2026

Capacity-Constrained Online Convex Optimization with Delayed Feedback

Authors: Alexander RyabchenkoIdan AttiasDaniel M. Roy

Organizations: Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Toronto; Vector Institute. · Institute for Data, Econometrics, Algorithms, and Learning (IDEAL), hosted by UIC and TTIC.

Abstract

Online learning with delayed feedback typically assumes that the learner can track all pending rounds until their feedback arrives. In practice, tracking resources are finite, and feedback from untracked rounds is permanently lost. In this paper, we study delayed online convex optimization (OCO) under a hard capacity constraint, where at most CC pending rounds can be tracked at any time. To model delay information, we introduce a semi-clairvoyant model that refines the clairvoyant assumption from prior work: rather than requiring delays to be known at prediction time, the learner observes delay expirations online, consistent with the classical unconstrained delayed setting. Our approach proceeds via a reduction to a novel ``delayed and weighted'' OCO problem, using a scheduler that randomizes tracking decisions and importance-weights the resulting observations. For this base problem, we propose and analyze Delayed-Weighted FTRL and its bandit analogue, establishing regret bounds that explicitly characterize the interaction between time-varying weights and delayed feedback. Combining these base learners with our schedulers yields the first regret guarantees for capacity-constrained OCO under convex and strongly convex losses, for both first-order and bandit feedback. For first-order feedback, capacity C=Ω(logT)C = Ω(\log T) suffices to recover standard delayed OCO rates up to logarithmic factors. For bandit feedback, the regret rates are modulated by powers of (1+σmax/C)(1 + σ_{\text{max}}/C), where σmaxσ_{\text{max}} is the maximum number of pending observations at any time. This allows the regret bound to degrade gracefully when C<σmaxC < σ_{\text{max}}, while remaining sublinear.

Explore similar work

Jun 6, 2026cs.LG

Noise-Adaptive High-Probability Regret Bounds for Online Convex Optimization

We study high-probability regret bounds for online convex optimization (OCO) with strongly convex losses and establish three results that resolve open questions at the intersection of noise adaptivity, feedback structure, and constraint satisfaction. For the full-information setting with sub-Gaussian stochastic gradients, we prove a noise-adaptive high-probability regret bound in which the martingale deviation term scales with the noise level σσ rather than the gradient bound GG, yielding a multiplicative improvement of G/σG/σ over the classical Azuma-Hoeffding baseline. Our analysis introduces an exponential supermartingale argument that bypasses the bounded-difference requirement of Freedman's inequality, enabling direct treatment of unbounded sub-Gaussian noise without truncation artifacts. For bandit feedback, we prove a minimax lower bound: the high-probability regret scales linearly in log(1/δ)\log(1/δ), in contrast to the log(1/δ)\sqrt{\log(1/δ)} confidence cost under full information. This constitutes a formal separation in the confidence cost of strongly convex OCO across feedback models. Regarding constrained OCO with stochastic constraints satisfying a Slater condition, we provide simultaneous high-probability guarantees for both cumulative regret and long-run constraint violation, achieving O(Tlog(m/δ))\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{T\log(m/δ)}) regret and O(T/(ζδ)+mTlog(m/δ))\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{T}/(ζδ) + m\sqrt{T\log(m/δ)}) violation. Synthetic experiments corroborate all theoretical predictions.
Wentao Zhang, Yutong Zhang, Wentao Mo
Jun 15, 2026cs.LG

Near-Optimal Stochastic Linear Bandits with Delay

We study stochastic linear bandits with delayed feedback under several delay models and establish near-optimal regret guarantees. Our results identify when delayed linear bandits exhibit the same qualitative behavior as multi-armed bandits (MAB), and when the linear structure creates fundamentally new challenges. Specifically, (1) for \emph{loss-independent delays}, where the delay does not depend on the realized loss (but potentially depends on the arm), we show that delays incur only an additive regret penalty. Under stochastic delays, this penalty scales with the expected delay, while under adversarial delays, it scales with the maximum number of outstanding observations. Notably, both delay penalties are dimension-free, improving upon the state-of-the-art results; (2) for \emph{loss-dependent delays}, we show that linear bandits are substantially harder than MAB: unlike in MAB, we prove matching (up to log factors) upper and lower bounds in linear bandits, whose delay penalty depends on the square root of the dimension. (3) for the \emph{delay-as-payoff model}, a special case of loss-dependent delay, we show that the optimal MAB guarantee, which depends only on the delay of the optimal arm, is also unattainable in linear bandits. Together, these results provide a sharp characterization of how delayed feedback interacts with linear generalization.
Ofir Schlisselberg, Mengxiao Zhang, Yishay Mansour
Jun 30, 2026cs.LG

Constrained Online Convex Optimization without Slater's Condition

We study constrained online convex optimization with adversarial losses and stochastic or adversarial constraints. For stochastic constraints, existing algorithms that achieve nearly optimal regret and constraint violation bounds typically rely on regularity assumptions such as Slater's condition, while adversarial-constraint algorithms avoid these assumptions by using a rather restrictive round-wise feasible comparator. We bridge this gap with an anytime primal-dual framework that incorporates an adaptive regularizer into the dual update. The regularizer stabilizes the dual process without relying on the negative drift induced by Slater's condition. For stochastic constraints and convex losses, our algorithm achieves O(T)O(\sqrt{T}) expected regret and O(TlogT)O(\sqrt{T}\log T) expected cumulative constraint violation. Furthermore, we show that our algorithm also admits high-probability bounds of the same order on regret and constraint violation. For strongly convex losses, the regret bound improves to O(logT)O(\log T) with a violation bound of the same order. With a minor modification, the framework also applies to adversarial constraints and provides guarantees for hard constraint violation.
Kihyun Yu, Junehee Lee, Dabeen Lee