Findings of the MAGMaR 2026 Shared Task

Retrieval-augmented generation from videos requires systems to retrieve relevant audiovisual evidence from large corpora and synthesize it into coherent, attributed text. Current approaches struggle at both ends: retrieval methods fail on complex, multi-faceted queries that cannot be captured by a single embedding, while generation methods lack the high-level reasoning needed to synthesize across multiple videos and face memory constraints over long, multi-video contexts. We present MARQUIS: a three-stage pipeline that addresses these limitations through (1) query expansion, fusion, and reranking, (2) calibrated structured evidence extraction, and (3) article generation from extracted evidence, optionally controlled by an RLM. On the MAGMaR2026 shared task, we improve retrieval performance from 0.195 to 0.759 (nDCG@10). For article generation, ITER-QA-BASE improves average human score from 3.09 to 3.83 over the CAG baseline, while MARQUIS-RLM achieves a human score of 3.30 and the strongest citation recall among non-QA systems.

This paper presents our system description for the 2nd Workshop on Multimodal Augmented Generation via MultimodAl Retrieval (MAGMaR). Addressing the critical challenges of cross-lingual long-video comprehension, strict persona adherence, and zero-hallucination temporal grounding, we propose a fully training-free, two-stage cascaded Video RAG pipeline. Our architecture strategically decouples semantic retrieval from cognitive logical reasoning through a modality-aware division of labor. In the first stage, a high-recall semantic pre-fetching module employs dense retrieval using only high-fidelity visual summaries and global text descriptions, explicitly isolating noisy modalities (e.g., OCR and ASR) to maintain a pristine vector space. In the second stage, an Adaptive, Iterative, and Reasoning-based (A.I.R.) filtering agent, powered by a commercial Large Language Model (LLM), performs fine-grained cognitive reranking. The agent re-incorporates full multimodal contexts to enforce strict logical alignment with user personas, effectively pruning semantically similar but logically irrelevant candidates. Finally, a Prompt Sculpting mechanism constrains the generator to synthesize the distilled subset into strictly formatted JSON responses with exact chunk-level citations. Evaluated on the RAG track, our resource-aware approach shows exceptional precision in both information retrieval and persona-conditioned generation.

Modern multimodal generative models can synthesize visually compelling images and videos, but it remains unclear whether this visual fluency reflects genuine reasoning: when prompted to generate a solution, can a model preserve the physical, logical, spatial, and temporal constraints a task requires, or does it merely produce plausible-looking media? To answer this question, we introduce MMGR (Multi-Modal Generative Reasoning Benchmark and Evaluation), a benchmark for evaluating generative reasoning across video, image, and language-based systems. MMGR covers 10 tasks from three domains (Abstract Reasoning, Embodied Navigation, and Physical Commonsense) and probes five reasoning abilities: Physical, Logical, 2D Spatial, 3D Spatial, and Temporal. Its evaluation emphasizes answer-verifiable tasks and, for video generation, process-aware chain-of-frame reasoning, where intermediate frames must form valid steps toward the target outcome rather than visually smooth but incorrect transitions. Evaluating state-of-the-art video generators, image generators, and LLM/VLM baselines reveals a sharp gap between visual quality and reasoning correctness: video models perform best on Physical Commonsense, but remain weak on symbolic tasks such as Sudoku, ARC, and Math, and brittle in cross-view embodied navigation. Image generators often outperform video generators on embodied navigation despite lacking temporal outputs, showing that longer visual generation does not automatically yield stronger reasoning. MMGR reframes evaluation of multimodal generation from whether outputs look realistic to whether they solve the underlying reasoning problem.