XRDiff: Crystal Structure Prediction from Powder X-Ray Diffraction Data Using Diffusion Models

Recovering a periodic 3D crystal structure from sparse, unindexed electron diffraction (ED) observations is a challenging generative inverse problem. Existing ED-based learning methods mainly predict crystallographic labels, reconstruct structures from indexed reflections, or retrieve candidates from finite structure libraries. Here, we introduce ED-CSP, a machine learning framework that predicts crystal structures from chemical composition, atom count, and multiple detector-plane ED spot sets. ED-CSP combines a relational set encoder, permutation-invariant multi-view aggregation, and a periodic flow generator to jointly predict lattice parameters and fractional atomic coordinates. To train the model, we construct ED-CS, a dataset of 4.85 million simulated multi-view ED crystal structures, deduplicated across seven materials repositories and filtered to exclude CHILI-100K overlaps. On 2,075 held-out CHILI-100K materials, ED-CSP trained only on CHILI achieves a structural match rate of 57.49% MR@5, outperforming PXRDGen (52.92%), a state-of-the-art crystal structure prediction model conditioned on powder X-ray diffraction. Scaling training data further improves performance: initializing from a one-million-structure precursor raises MR@5 to 66.27%. On 1,024 compositions absent from the training retrieval library, the model still achieves 53.52% MR@5, demonstrating true generative capability beyond exact-formula retrieval. Replacing target ED observations with diffraction from non-isomorphic structures of identical composition decreases MR@5 by 22.09 percentage points, confirming that predictions depend on the input diffraction patterns rather than composition alone. ED-CSP and ED-CS establish a benchmark for generative crystal structure prediction from sparse ED observations and provide a foundation for future transfer to experimental data.

Multiphase powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) analysis remains a fundamental bottleneck in structure identification, as real-world synthesis often produces complex mixtures whose constituent phases (components) cannot be reliably disentangled. While recent advances in representation-based crystal retrieval and generation suggest the possibility of inferring structures directly from PXRD, existing approaches largely assume single-phase inputs and break down in multiphase settings. Here, we present XDecomposer, a prior-free framework for joint decomposition and identification of multiphase XRD patterns without requiring candidate phase lists, structural templates, or prior knowledge of phase number. We formulate multiphase diffraction analysis as a set prediction problem, where the model infers an unordered set of phase-resolved components, their mixture proportions, and corresponding structural representations within a unified architecture. A phase-query-driven decomposition mechanism, together with diffraction-consistent physical reconstruction, enables accurate source separation while preserving crystallographic fidelity. Extensive experiments on both simulated and experimental datasets show that XDecomposer substantially improves reconstruction accuracy and phase identification across diverse chemical systems, while maintaining strong generalization to unseen mixtures. These results provide a practical route toward data-driven, source-resolved multiphase XRD analysis and reduce long-standing dependence on prior-guided iteratively phase matching. The code is openly available at https://github.com/Licht0812/XDecomposer

Miller-index identification from powder XRD patterns requires capabilities untested by existing multimodal benchmarks: the model must read a narrow peak location from a rendered scientific curve and then connect that observation to multi-step crystallographic reasoning. We introduce CrystalXRD-Bench, a 250-sample benchmark built from 10 public crystallographic databases for a single task: recover the full set of HKLs contributing to the highest-intensity peak in an XRD pattern. Each sample pairs the rendered XRD image with the source CIF text and chemical formula, so visual extraction errors and reasoning errors can be examined side by side. We evaluate seven vision-language models. The best Jaccard score is 0.5888 (GPT-5.4) with an exact-match rate of 37.6%, yet six of seven models remain below Jaccard 0.50; the task is far from solved. Error patterns vary systematically: double-peak cases are especially brittle, recall-heavy models gain coverage by over-predicting HKLs, and access to CIF text does not close the gap in crystallographic calculation. Alongside model rankings, the benchmark identifies the conditions under which current VLMs fail on quantitative scientific figures. All data and evaluation code will be publicly available.