cs.CVJun 13, 2026

Analyzing Visual Aircraft Representations with Sparse Autoencoders

Authors: Deepshik Sharma

Organizations: Department of Computer Science & Engineering · Jain University, Bangalore, India

Abstract

Vision models can achieve strong performance on classification tasks, but the internal representations supporting their predictions are often difficult to interpret. This work investigates whether sparse autoencoders can decompose intermediate representations of a vision model into interpretable features. We train a ConvNeXt classifier on the FGVC-Aircraft dataset, extract spatial activations from its final feature stage, and train a sparse autoencoder on these activations. The learned sparse features are analyzed using top-activating image patches, activation strength, and class selectivity. Qualitative visual inspection reveals that several features correspond to recognizable aircraft structures and visual patterns. We evaluate a subset of selected features using input-space and feature-space ablations, measuring how blurring image patches and suppressing sparse features affect class logits, classification margins, and prediction confidence. The results suggest that sparse autoencoders can reveal partially interpretable, class-relevant visual features associated with aircraft recognition, while also exposing limitations such as polysemanticity and coarse spatial localization.

Explore similar work

May 30, 2026cs.LG

Query Lens: Interpreting Sparse Key-Value Features with Indirect Effects

While sparse autoencoders provide features more interpretable than individual neurons, reliably characterizing them remains challenging. We propose Query Lens, which extends Logit Lens to enable more comprehensive and faithful interpretations of sparse features. By jointly considering encoder-side key features and decoder-side value features, we identify both the inputs that activate a feature and the outputs it promotes. We also account for indirect, module-mediated effects that arise when the feature is processed by downstream modules, going beyond the direct effect captured by Logit Lens. In experiments, we find that Query Lens yields coherent token signatures for features that remain uninterpretable under Logit Lens. Finally, we propose the Subspace Channel Hypothesis, suggesting that downstream modules read features through layer-specific subspaces.
Hwiyeong Lee, Ingyu Bang, Uiji Hwang +2
Jun 25, 2026cs.LG

Beyond the Hard Budget: Sparsity Regularizers for More Interpretable Top-k Sparse Autoencoders

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have become a leading tool for interpreting the representations of vision foundation models, decomposing their polysemantic activations into a larger set of sparse, more monosemantic features. The Top-kk SAE, a now-standard variant, enforces sparsity architecturally through its activation function, retaining only the kk most active latents per input. Because it was designed precisely to avoid the 1\ell_1 penalty used by earlier SAEs and its known drawbacks, it has not been combined with an explicit sparsity regularizer. Yet the Top-kk SAE retains limitations of its own, and we hypothesize that a sparsity penalty acting before the selection could sharpen each latent's selectivity and make the code more interpretable, without reintroducing the drawbacks of the 1\ell_1 penalty. We introduce two sparsity regularizers compatible with the Top-kk architecture, both acting on the activations before the Top-kk selection: an 1\ell_1 penalty on the unselected (off-support) units, and a scale-invariant 1/2\ell_1/\ell_2-ratio penalty that concentrates the code onto fewer effective units. Both penalties are applied only to the batch-active units, those selected by the Top-kk operator at least once within the batch. Across two datasets, three vision foundation models, and a range of kk, both regularizers consistently improve monosemanticity at no cost to reconstruction quality. The 1/2\ell_1/\ell_2 penalty further concentrates information into fewer latents, making reconstruction more robust to the inference-time choice of kk and improving small-budget linear probing. Our central finding is that hard architectural sparsity and soft sparsity regularization are complementary rather than mutually exclusive.
Nathanaël Jacquier, Maria Vakalopoulou, Mahdi S. Hosseini
Jul 27, 2026cs.LG

Sparse Autoencoders Encode Both Concepts and Functions: The Downstream Geometry of Feature Effects

The wide-scale use of sparse autoencoders (SAEs) as interpretability tools is limited by inconsistent links between SAE features and model behavior. Features with clear activation descriptions may have weak or unexpected causal effects; steering can vary across prompts or oppose the intended direction; and activation-based feature selection can miss features that produce the desired output change. Prior work has studied feature geometry inside the model, where features are computed. We instead study the geometry of changes in model logits caused by feature interventions. We introduce Feature-Effect Geometry Analysis (FEGA), an unsupervised framework that removes the same active SAE feature across contexts and analyzes the resulting cloud of logit changes. Across SAE variants, consistent one-dimensional effects are rare: few features behave like reusable directions. To interpret this variation, we distinguish value-like features, tied to static information such as factual attributes, from pointer-like features, associated with context-dependent operations. Value-like features more often exhibit structured, low-dimensional effects, although these effects typically span several directions. Pointer-like features, by contrast, predominantly exhibit diffuse effects. Our results show that a feature can be interpretable and causally relevant without providing a stable direction for steering.
Phu Gia Hoang, Anwoy Chatterjee, Tanmoy Chakraborty +2