Conflict-Aware Federated Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models with Mixture-of-Experts

Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for privacy-preserving distributed learning. However, existing FL methods face a fundamental challenge. Traditional averaging-based approaches suffer from parameter divergence under non-IID conditions, while personalized FL methods overfit to local data and fail to generalize to new clients (cold-start problem). Mixture-of-Experts naturally addresses this by routing heterogeneous data to specialized experts rather than forcing uniform aggregation. In this paper, we propose FedCoE, a Federated Coordinated dual-level mixture-of-Experts framework that effectively balances global generalization with local personalization. FedCoE maintains multiple independent global expert models on the server and employs a shared gating network to dynamically model client-expert correlations during aggregation, effectively mitigating expert drift and gating inconsistency. To address the cold-start challenge, we introduce an adaptive mechanism that enables new clients to immediately leverage the global expert pool without extensive local training. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FedCoE achieves 78.00% global accuracy and 89.32% personalized accuracy on average, outperforming the baseline by 8.82% and 29.19%, respectively. In cold-start scenarios, FedCoE delivers 77.27% accuracy without any local fine-tuning, outperforming baselines by over 12.54%.

Federated PEFT enables LLMs to collaboratively adapt to decentralized private data without sharing raw examples. However, task heterogeneity across clients can cause cross-task interference and gradient conflicts during aggregation. Federated MoE-LoRA addresses this challenge through specialized LoRA experts and conditional routing. Yet existing methods typically specialize at client granularity, implicitly assuming task-coherent clients. Our core insight is that experts need purity, namely pattern-coherent updates that preserve specialization, whereas routers need contrast, namely mixed-task observations that support expert comparison. We propose FedWeave, a framework that adopts asymmetric aggregation, separating expert aggregation from router optimization to meet these two requirements. FedWeave uses unsupervised prototype discovery to form local buckets and align them across clients, enabling prototype-level expert aggregation while retaining mixed-task client trajectories for router training. At inference, FedWeave performs sparse inference with one active expert while preserving nearly all soft-routing performance. Our theoretical analysis explains why asymmetric aggregation is advantageous: it controls expert convergence in stationarity through off-pattern contamination, identifies the consensus error induced by fragmented router trajectories, and bounds sparse-inference risk. On a heterogeneous multi-task benchmark with mainstream LLM backbones, FedWeave consistently outperforms strong baselines, while ablations verify the effectiveness of our design.

Heterogeneous LoRA-rank methods address system heterogeneity in federated fine-tuning of foundation models by assigning client-specific ranks based on computational capabilities. However, these methods achieve only marginal computational savings, as dense feed-forward computations dominate. Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (SMoE) provides a promising alternative through conditional computation, yet we identify that its naive application to heterogeneous federated settings introduces two critical discordances: (i) expert utilization imbalance and (ii) non-differentiability of Top-K routing. Our convergence analysis demonstrates that these discordances lead to degraded convergence, particularly for resource-constrained clients. To address these challenges, we propose Universally Balanced Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (UB-SMoE), which introduces Dynamic Modulated Routing (DMR) to rebalance expert utilization, and Universal Pseudo-Gradient (PG) to reconstruct learning signals for non-activated experts. These mechanisms form a self-reinforcing cycle that maintains expert viability across heterogeneous clients. Experiments on benchmarks show that UB-SMoE achieves up to $45.0\%$ computational reduction on low-resource clients while improving their performance by $8.7 \times$ compared to existing heterogeneous LoRA-rank methods.