cs.LGJun 14, 2026

Z-Plane Neural Networks: Bounded Geometric Activation Replaces ReLU and LayerNorm

Authors: Sungwoo GooHwi-yeol YunSangkeun Jung

Abstract

Modern deep neural networks rely on Euclidean scalar activations (e.g., ReLU) and global normalization techniques (e.g., LayerNorm) to prevent gradient instability in deep architectures. However, these mechanisms inherently cause dead neurons, discard critical directional information, and destroy the orthogonality of feature representations. Inspired by the frequency-modulation transmission of biological axons, we propose the Z-Plane Neural Network, which maps hidden states into 2D phasor bundles on a hypersphere. We introduce a novel geometric activation function, Radial Bounding(x/max(1,x2)\mathbf{x} / \max(1, \|\mathbf{x}\|_2)), which limits the energy magnitude while preserving the phase (direction). We demonstrate mathematically that this isotropic activation maintains 1-Lipschitz continuity and prevents gradient vanishing by preserving tangential gradients. Empirically, a 100-layer Z-Plane Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP)-entirely devoid of ReLU and LayerNorm-successfully converges on the MNIST dataset with 98.34% accuracy and absolute numerical stability, proving that bounded geometric activation alone is sufficient for stable deep learning.

Explore similar work

Apr 21, 2026cs.LG

ZC-Swish: Stabilizing Deep BN-Free Networks for Edge and Micro-Batch Applications

Batch Normalization (BN) is a cornerstone of deep learning, yet it fundamentally breaks down in micro-batch regimes (e.g., 3D medical imaging) and non-IID Federated Learning. Removing BN from deep architectures, however, often leads to catastrophic training failures such as vanishing gradients and dying channels. We identify that standard activation functions, like Swish and ReLU, exacerbate this instability in BN-free networks due to their non-zero-centered nature, which causes compounding activation mean-shifts as network depth increases. In this technical communication, we propose Zero-Centered Swish (ZC-Swish), a drop-in activation function parameterized to dynamically anchor activation means near zero. Through targeted stress-testing on BN-free convolutional networks at depths 8, 16, and 32, we demonstrate that while standard Swish collapses to near-random performance at depth 16 and beyond, ZC-Swish maintains stable layer-wise activation dynamics and achieves the highest test accuracy at depth 16 (51.5%) with seed 42. ZC-Swish thus provides a robust, parameter-efficient solution for stabilizing deep networks in memory-constrained and privacy-preserving applications where traditional normalization is unviable.
Suvinava Basak
Jun 1, 2026cs.CV

SaluNet: Enabling Total Plasticity in Normalization-Free Deep Networks

Normalization layers such as BatchNorm and LayerNorm have long been considered essential for stable training in deep networks. This work demonstrates that they can be fully replaced by a single learnable activation mechanism. We identify a plasticity suppression effect induced by standard normalization: learnable activation parameters rapidly lose adaptability when paired with normalization layers. Motivated by this observation, we introduce SALU (Saturated Adaptive Linear Unit), SALU(x;a,b)=ax1+abx2,a>0,  b>0\operatorname{SALU}(x;a,b) = \frac{a x}{\sqrt{1 + a b x^2}},\quad a>0,\; b>0 a bounded, learnable activation that provides intrinsic signal stabilization without relying on batch statistics or external affine parameters. Building on SALU, we propose SaluNet, a paradigm grounded in total plasticity: SALU replaces normalization layers, while SWALU and GALU replace standard activations. With ResNet-18, SaluNet-C-18 achieves 97.35% on CIFAR-10 and 83.25% on CIFAR-100 without normalization, maintaining 93.44% and 76.23% at batch size 1 where normalized architectures fail. For transformers, SaluNet-T improves over LayerNorm-GELU from 90.92% to 91.01% on CIFAR-10 and from 66.54% to 68.10% on CIFAR-100. SaluNet-C-50 reaches 78.67% Top-1 on ImageNet-1K at 224×224224\times224, and 79.23%79.23\% at 288×288288\times288. These results suggest normalization layers suppress total plasticity, a property biological neurons inherently possess, enabling deep networks to learn effectively.
Mourad Zaied
Jul 6, 2026stat.ML

Deep Neural Variation Spaces: A Unifying Perspective on Depth and Complexity

We develop a unified function space theory of deep fully connected neural networks. Functions in our spaces are defined recursively as 1\ell^1-bounded linear combinations of activated functions from preceding layers, with a dictionary of affine functions at the first layer. Unlike existing theories that are largely specialized to homogeneous activations such as the ReLU, our framework provides a meaningful notion of functional complexity for deep networks with a broad range of homogeneous and non-homogeneous activation functions commonly used in practice. This simple construction unites several seemingly disparate ideas from the literature, including norm-based complexity bounds and variational characterizations of depth, and facilitates novel analyses of what kinds of functions deep norm-constrained networks can represent. To this end, we prove a novel representer theorem for our spaces and establish novel function-space complexity bounds showing that the associated function classes remain qualitatively small at arbitrary depth. In the univariate ReLU case, we prove a "depth saturation" result: depth in this setting yields only a small constant rescaling of the function class, with no added functional diversity. As a consequence, we show that deep norm-controlled ReLU functions in any dimension cannot exhibit high frequencies along any direction. This finding reveals that some commonly cited expressivity benefits of depth disappear once network complexity is controlled by an appropriate function space norm, rather than parameter count or other representational costs that permit compounded rescaling across layers. Overall, our results illustrate how a function space perspective yields new structural insights into the relationship between depth and complexity.
Julia Nakhleh, Robert D. Nowak