The Information-Theoretic Benefit of Shared Representations under Orthogonality Constraints
Authors: Thomas Dittrich, Oliver Potocki, Philipp Grohs
Organizations: Johann Radon Institute of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Austrian Academy of Sciences · Faculty of Mathematics, University of Vienna
Abstract
Modern deep learning architectures are increasingly multi-task and multi-modal, using a pretrained foundation model combined with task-specific, fine-tuned models. Empirically, exploiting similarity across different problems, instead of solving them individually, can significantly improve overall performance. While the generalization and sample complexity properties of multitask learning have been widely studied, the parametric complexity of joint approximation in comparison to separate approximation remains less well understood. The question is particularly relevant in modern deep learning, where models are increasingly required to satisfy structural constraints such as equivariance, conservation laws, or orthogonality. We prove lower and upper bounds on the description-length for separate and joint approximation classes, respectively, in uniform norm. We build a class of orthogonal functions by composing a shared hard feature, realized by a Rademacher-Haar wavelet series, with Sawtooth-Walsh readouts to enforce orthogonality of output coordinates. The dyadic tree structure of the Rademacher-Haar wavelet concentrates the approximation hardness in the common feature component, while the readouts act as task-specific heads. Using an information-theoretic framework, we obtain a sharp gap between the optimal approximation rates achievable by joint and separate coding. Finally, we realize this separation in a neural network model using Heaviside activations via reduction to triangle-wave approximation. Our results show that even under an orthogonality constraint joint approximation requires strictly fewer bits in compositional architectures, provided the tasks share a latent hard feature. This provides theoretical insight into the description-length-efficiency of compositional multi-output architectures and clarifies how neural networks can retain expressivity under geometric constraints.
The ability of deep neural networks to learn hierarchical features is widely regarded as a key mechanism underlying their success in high-dimensional learning. Existing theory partially supports this view by establishing approximation rates based on parameter counts and sample complexity guarantees for compositional models without incurring the curse of dimensionality (CoD). To study overparameterized regimes, where the number of parameters exceeds the sample size, we develop a framework that measures complexity via the parameter norm. Within this approach, we establish approximation rates and excess risk bounds for learning sparse compositional functions whose compositional structure is represented by directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), using Frobenius norm-constrained deep neural networks. Our results have broad applicability since every function that is efficiently Turing computable admits sparse compositional representations. In particular, we cover a range of representative models, including multi-index models, binary tree structures, and general compositional architectures. The rates we derive show that deep networks can exploit the compositional structure of the target functions, effectively avoiding the CoD through hierarchical representations.
We study the approximation and statistical complexity of learning collections of operators in a shared multi-task setting, with a focus on the Multiple Neural Operators (MNO) architecture. For broad classes of Lipschitz multiple operator maps, we derive near-optimal upper bounds for approximation and statistical generalization. On the lower-bound side, we establish a curse of parametric complexity and prove corresponding minimax rates. Together, these results show that shared representations across tasks do not increase the overall cost: multi-task operator learning follows the same scaling laws as single operator learning. We also compare MNO with a multi-task extension of DeepONet based on concatenated task inputs and show that, from a worst-case approximation-complexity perspective, both architectures satisfy essentially the same asymptotic rates.
Traditional approximation theory measures convergence rates in terms of the number of parameters or degrees of freedom. However, practical computation operates under finite precision: parameters must be encoded using a finite number of bits. Therefore, approximation efficiency should be evaluated in terms of computational bit complexity, which is intrinsically connected to the metric entropy of the underlying function class. In this work, we develop a unified approximation framework based on binary encoding and metric entropy. We analyze classical methods (including polynomial approximation, sparse grids, and finite elements) as well as shallow and deep neural networks, and compare their approximation rates for function classes with comparable metric entropy. We observe that, when evaluated in terms of bits, most classical methods are in general suboptimal relative to the intrinsic limits dictated by metric entropy, while neural network methods may exhibit different behaviors. We show that when complexity is measured in bits rather than parameters, no method fundamentally exceeds the approximation order achieved by classical approaches. Our results also indicate that many seeming advantages of neural networks, including dimension-independent rates and superconvergence phenomena, stem from differences in function class complexity rather than intrinsic architectural superiority. In this sense, the traditional curse of dimensionality can be misleading; the fundamental limitation is instead a curse of bit complexity, governed by metric entropy.