MASCOT-Android: A Curated Dataset and Automated Collection Pipeline for Android Malware Source Code Specimens

Android malware detectors built with machine learning often suffer from temporal bias: models are trained and evaluated without respecting apps' actual release times, inflating accuracy and weakening real-world robustness. We address this by constructing a time-stamped dataset of benign and malicious Android apps and introducing a timestamp-verification procedure to ensure temporal accuracy. We then propose a detection framework that uses Bootstrap Your Own Latent (BYOL) for self-supervised pre-training to learn obfuscation-resilient representations, followed by supervised classification. Under time-aware evaluation, the method attains 98% accuracy and 89% F1. We further characterize malware behavior by analyzing true positives and false negatives using VirusTotal and the MITRE ATT&CK framework. To support reproducibility and further innovation, we release our dataset and source code.

Machine learning (ML) in real-world systems must contend with concept drift, adversarial actors, and a spectrum of potential features with varying costs and benefits. Malware naturally exhibits all of these complexities, but for the same reason, it is challenging to curate and organize data to study these factors. We present McNdroid, to our knowledge the largest longitudinal multimodal Android malware benchmark for malware detection and drift analysis. McNdroid spans 2013--2025, excluding 2015, and represents each application with three aligned modalities--static features from manifests and smali code, dynamic behavioral features from sandbox execution, and graph-based features from function-call graphs. Using temporally separated splits, we evaluate standard ML and deep-learning detectors across increasing train--test time gaps. Results show clear temporal degradation, while multimodal fusion outperforms the best single modality across long-term temporal gaps. Cross-modal agreement also declines over time, suggesting that drift affects both individual feature spaces and the consistency among modalities. We further analyze modality-specific drift, malware-family evolution, and temporal changes in model explanations. We publicly release McNdroid, benchmark splits, and code to support reproducible research on temporal generalization and robust multimodal learning in security-critical, non-stationary settings.

LLMs are increasingly explored for malware analysis; however, current LLM-based malware attribution remains limited by unsupported indicators and insufficient code-level grounding for identifying malicious and vulnerable code segments. To address these limitations, this research introduces LCC-LLM, a code-centric benchmark dataset and evidence-grounded framework for malware attribution and multi-task static malware analysis. The proposed LCCD dataset contains approximately 34K PE samples processed through a large-scale reverse-engineering pipeline and represented using decompiled C code, assembly code, CFG/FCG artifacts, hexadecimal data, PE metadata, suspicious API evidence, and structural features. Beyond dataset construction, LCC-LLM integrates LangGraph-orchestrated static analysis with multi-source cybersecurity knowledge to support evidence-grounded malware reasoning. The framework employs a seven-layer retrieval-augmented generation pipeline, CoVe for IoC validation, and a multi-dimensional quality gate to improve factual reliability and analyst-oriented decision support. Curriculum-ordered instruction data is used to fine-tune DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B and Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B using QLoRA. Evaluation across 43 malware-analysis task types achieves an average semantic similarity of 0.634, with the highest task-level performance in structured report generation, IoC extraction, vulnerability assessment, malware configuration extraction, and malware class detection. In a real-world case study using MalwareBazaar samples, the grounded pipeline achieves a 10/10 structured analysis pass rate, producing CFG/FCG evidence, MITRE ATT&CK mappings, detection guidance, and analyst-ready reports. These results show that code-centric representations, retrieval grounding, and verification-guided reasoning improve the reliability and operational usefulness of LLM-assisted malware attribution.