On the Entropy Formula for Real, Complex, and Quaternionic Deep Linear Networks

We find the asymptotic ratio between the storage capacities when enforcing real pre-activations in a complex hypothesis class as opposed to complex ones in the same class. We use weights drawn from the complex Gaussian, which converge asymptotically in norm to the square root of dimension almost surely. Our methods depend on Gardner volume-type comparisons at critical capacity. Our proof relies on an application of the Harish-Chandra-Itzykson-Zuber (HCIZ) formula, nonstandard in literature. With the HCIZ formula, we may obtain a more robust approximation for the final asymptotic ratio. This strategy is applicable to our work specifically since we integrate over the unitary and orthogonal compact manifolds, facilitated via the Weyl integration formula and the Haar measure.

We present tensor network representations for discrete maximum entropy distributions under expectation constraints. To this end, we introduce Computation-Activation Networks (CompActNets), a tensor network architecture that subsumes exponential families. By leveraging the geometry of the convex polytope of realizable expectation vectors, we represent any maximum entropy distribution in the same architecture. We exploit the fact that proper faces of this polytope correspond to the boundary closure of exponential families, which restricts the distribution's support. We then derive explicit representations for the support within the CompActNet architecture. The proposed framework suggests tensor network ranks as complexity measures for faces. Finally, a case study on Boolean statistics links the geometry of 0/1-polytopes directly to propositional formulas.

Epistemic uncertainty quantification (UQ) for deep neural networks (DNNs) is a requirement for safe adoption of AI in mission-critical settings. Several leading methods for UQ linearize DNNs to form Bayesian Generalized Linear Models (GLMs), where epistemic uncertainty is modeled via the predictive posterior distribution. Linearizing around the parameters of the final connected layer of a DNN is a commonly used approximation for reducing the computational burden of such GLMs, though it is often believed to come at the cost of degraded performance. In this work, we compare GLMs arising from full-network and last-layer linearization using both theoretical and empirical approaches. We first employ tools from random matrix theory to conduct a theoretical comparison; this analysis reveals no meaningful improvement in the UQ capabilities of full linearization. Coupled with a large-scale empirical evaluation across a range of modern machine learning tasks, we arrive at the following conclusion: a last-layer approximation yields comparable UQ performance while offering substantially improved computational efficiency.