Organizations: Jio AICoE, Hyderabad, India · Signal Analysis and Interpretation Laboratory, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA · National Institute of Technology, Patna, India · Indian Institute of Technology, Jammu, India · Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Vaddeswaram, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh, India
Abstract
It is well known that intelligibility of speech reduces in the presence of ambient noise. However, studies show that all sounds are not affected uniformly (or equally) and that vowels are more robust to noise than consonants. In this study, intelligibility of various consonants is assessed and analyzed in stationary white noise and non-stationary babble noise conditions. Specifically, this study investigates the individual contribution of magnitude and phase spectra of a given speech signal on human speech recognition of consonants in noisy conditions. In this regard, three experiments are carried out. In experiment 1, clean signal, signal reconstructed with only magnitude spectrum information (magnitude only signal) and signal reconstructed with only phase spectrum information (phase only signal) are assessed for intelligibility. In experiment 2, noise is added to clean speech. From noisy speech, phase only signal and magnitude only signal are reconstructed and intelligibility tests are performed for all these three signals. In experiment 3, noise is added directly to the magnitude only and phase only signals reconstructed from clean speech and their intelligibility is assessed. Results of these experiments show that magnitude spectrum contributes more to intelligibility in clean condition than phase spectrum, while information from phase spectrum is more robust in noisy conditions. It is also observed that, among consonants, nasals are more susceptible to noise whereas fricatives and approximants were observed to be comparatively more robust.
Consonants contribute unequally to whether a word is understood. Given the limited time available for therapy, ranking consonants by contribution to intelligibility helps prioritize intervention targets in motor speech disorders. However, measuring this contribution relies on perceptual studies that are difficult to scale. This paper presents a scalable method that measures consonant contribution using acoustic masking. We silence one consonant at a time in an isolated word and test whether an automatic speech recognition (ASR) model still recognizes the word. We define a consonant's contribution score as the proportion of its masked instances for which the word becomes misrecognized, which we refer to as the mask-induced misrecognition rate (MMR). We validate MMR against two linguistic factors previously reported to correlate with consonant contribution, namely phoneme frequency and functional load. We apply this analysis across four languages, English, Spanish, German, and Czech, using three ASR architectures, MMS (encoder-only), Whisper (encoder-decoder), and Qwen3-ASR (LLM-based). Using partial Spearman correlations, we find that phoneme frequency correlates negatively with MMR while functional load correlates positively. In other words, more frequent consonants are less disruptive when masked, whereas consonants carrying more lexical contrast are more disruptive. Further cross-language analysis shows that consonant rankings are not consistent, indicating that consonant contribution is language-dependent.
Conventional training losses for speech enhancement based on the signal-to-distortion ratio (SDR) treat all time-frequency (TF) regions uniformly, overlooking the fine-grained spectral cues that are relevant to specific phoneme intelligibility. We propose a TF weighting framework that modulates the SDR objective based on local speech presence, speech-to-interference ratio (SIR), and spectral flux. By integrating these factors into a differentiable objective, the framework emphasizes TF bins with high speech-noise competition while also accounting for transient cues such as consonant bursts. Experimental results show that our approach improves objective frequency-weighted enhancement metrics, as well as phoneme recognition accuracy, particularly for consonants. Spectral analysis shows better reconstruction of mid-frequency structures at less adverse SIR.
Voice reconstruction using Text-to-Speech (TTS) offers a communication method for people with speech disorders, which aims to retain their speaker identity while improving intelligibility. Previous work generally relies on Mean Opinion Score (MOS) to evaluate naturalness and speaker similarity, but this has limited sensitivity and reliability. We propose an evaluation framework with subjective and objective components. Subjectively, we evaluate perceived intelligibility and speaker identity using Best Worst Scaling (BWS) with situational framing. Objectively, we demonstrate that standard measures fail to predict reconstruction success for highly unintelligible speakers, so we introduce a novel dual-reference distributional measure to assess the trade-off between intelligibility and speaker identity. By evaluating the output of 17 zero-shot TTS systems for 193 speakers, we show that our framework provides a reliable and task-aligned approach for assessing voice reconstruction.
Ariadna Sanchez, Christoph Minixhofer, Korin Richmond +3