KANLib -- A Modular, Extensible and Fast Kolmogorov-Arnold Network Implementation

Kolmogorov--Arnold Networks (KANs) replace scalar edge weights with learnable univariate functions parameterized by multiple basis coefficients. This introduces a source of redundancy that conventional neural-network compression does not directly expose. We present \textbf{SparseKAN}, a unified approach that compresses KANs along three complementary axes: basis functions, neurons/channels, and numerical precision. SparseKAN equips the base branch, nonlinear basis branch, and individual basis terms with hierarchical learnable gates trained under a differentiable active-cost objective. The learned importance structure is subsequently hardened under explicit basis and width budgets, recovered in full or low precision, and physically compacted into smaller dense tensors rather than retained as sparse masks. Experiments on MNIST, CIFAR-10, and CIFAR-100 across spline, polynomial, RBF, wavelet, and convolutional KAN variants show that the structural axes compose predictably in cost. We also find strong basis-dependent differences in term importance: coefficient-based selection outperforms matched low-order truncation by up to 15.25 accuracy points in the evaluated Gram-polynomial settings. Eight-bit quantization is broadly robust, whereas 4-bit convolutional KANs require quantization-aware adaptation. Physical compaction removes up to 73.0% of parameters without accuracy loss on MNIST and reduces large-batch CUDA latency to as little as $0.51\times$ dense execution. On a ZCU104 FPGA, the resulting sparse low-bit models achieve up to $23.63\times$ lower inference latency, demonstrating that SparseKAN converts functional redundancy into measurable software and hardware efficiency. The SparseKAN implementation is available at https://github.com/OSU-STARLAB/SparseKAN.

This study presents an empirical benchmarking comparison between Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) and Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs) on structured tabular classification tasks. Motivated by the growing interest in KANs as an alternative function-approximating architecture, we evaluate their out-of-the-box performance on twelve publicly available datasets spanning binary, multiclass, multilabel, and ordinal problems. Both models were trained under standardized preprocessing, architecture, and fixed hyperparameter settings, with performance assessed using test accuracy and F1-Score, paired hypothesis testing, and effect size analysis. Results show that KANs statistically outperform MLPs in binary and multiclass domains and achieve a significant aggregate advantage across all datasets. However, the observed medium effect size (d = -0.46) raises an important cost-benefit consideration: while KANs offer superior generalization through adaptive spline-based mappings, this advantage comes with substantially higher parameter and computational complexity relative to the MLP baseline. These findings suggest KANs are the preferred choice for high-precision applications, while MLPs remain a robust and efficient option for resource-constrained environments. Future work should extend this analysis to additional data modalities to further refine these architectural selection criteria.

Kolmogorov--Arnold Networks (KANs) replace linear weights with spline-based functions, offering strong expressivity but posing challenges for low-precision deployment due to heterogeneous parameter distributions. We introduce QuantKAN, the first unified framework for quantization-aware training (QAT) and post-training quantization (PTQ) of KANs. The framework employs branch-aware quantizers for base and spline parameters and extends modern QAT and PTQ methods to spline-based layers across EfficientKAN, FastKAN, PyKAN, and KAGN. Experiments on MNIST, CIFAR-10/100, TinyImageNet, and ImageNet provide the first unified QAT/PTQ KAN benchmarks and show that DSQ is the most robust QAT method at aggressive low-bit settings, while GPTQ is the strongest PTQ method at moderate precision. Sensitivity analyses reveal architecture-specific failure modes: spline/basis parameters dominate in FastKAN, while base or scaling parameters dominate in EfficientKAN, GRAM, and PyKAN. Vivado HLS estimates on a Xilinx UltraScale+ device further suggest up to 3.32$\times$ throughput and 7.7$\times$ lower estimated dynamic energy per inference under W4A4, exposing a residual \emph{basis-evaluation tax} that motivates basis-aware microarchitecture. QuantKAN is available at https://github.com/OSU-STARLAB/QuantKAN/.