EMORSION: Examining the Impact of Audio Parameters on Emotional Responses and Immersion in Film
Authors: Nelly Garcia, Ruby Crocker, Bleiz M Del Sette, Fabrizio Smeraldi, Charalampos Saitis, George Fazekas, Joshua Reiss
Organizations: Queen Mary University of London
Abstract
EMORSION is an exploratory proof-of-concept study examining how film audio design shapes audience emotion and immersion in acinema setting. Four film scenes were selected across the horror (2) and drama (2) genres, balanced between mainstream and independent productions. For each scene, multiple alternative audio mixes were created by systematically manipulating three core aspects of audio design, frequency (pitch), dynamics (loudness), and directionality (spatial placement). Three audience groups viewed the scenes, with each group exposed to one manipulated mix alongside a control mix for each scene. Audience responses were assessed through a triangulated multimodal framework combining self-reported emotion and immersion via a questionnaire, physiological measures including heart rate monitoring, and video-based motion tracking. The protocol successfully captured measurable, interpretable differences across audio conditions, indicating that even subtle changes in audio design can shape emotional perception and immersion. Unconventional mixes tended to produce greater variability in audience interpretation, while conventional immersive mixes were associated with stronger cross-audience agreement. These findings establish the feasibility of the EMORSION protocol and motivate larger-scale studies to characterise the role of specific audio parameters in shaping audience experience.
Evaluating generative spatial audio for First-Order Ambisonics (FOA) remains challenging due to a limited understanding of how metrics respond to changes in spatial parameters such as azimuth and elevation. We propose a framework to analyze metric sensitivity along continuous spatial trajectories, drawing on principles of sensitivity analysis in parametric sound synthesis. Using controlled FOA scenes with increasing scene complexity, we define three desiderata for metric behavior: Responsiveness, Smoothness, and Symmetry. We assess standard distribution-based and sample-based metrics, including Fréchet Audio Distance (FAD), intensity vectors, and acoustic maps. Our findings show that FAD using localization-specific embeddings and acoustic maps yield high Responsiveness and robust Smoothness and Symmetry across conditions, while intensity vectors degrade with increasing scene complexity. This is the first step towards investigating the sensitivity of metrics for generative spatial audio.
Recent Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) have achieved remarkable progress in audio perceptual tasks across individual acoustic layers, including speech, sound, and music. However, existing benchmarks predominantly evaluate these layers in isolation, overlooking the complex contextual relationships that arise when multiple acoustic sources co-occur in real-world auditory scenes. Real-world auditory interpretation requires Context-Aware Auditory Scene Understanding (CASU): the ability to comprehend the holistic scene by integrating sound layers. To evaluate this capability, we introduce the CASU benchmark, which assesses whether Audio LLMs can interpret auditory scenes composed of speech, acoustic events (e.g., announcements), and background environments (e.g., traffic), and reason about the logical relationships between these layers. We propose a scalable pipeline for constructing time-accurate, semi-synthetic audio streams by composing real-world scene sounds with synthetic speech. Building on this data, we design four tasks that probe scene understanding: contextual question answering, entity extraction from the scene, speaker role inference, and counterfactual reasoning where scene is manipulated. Experiments across multiple LALMs demonstrate that effective auditory scene understanding requires integration over all auditory layers, rather than reliance on speech or sound alone, underscoring the necessity of CASU for advancing complex audio understanding in LALMs.
Pengfei Zhang, Hoang H Nguyen, Kazi Shaharair Sharif +6
Audio-capable foundation models enable end-to-end spoken interaction, but they also introduce safety risks beyond transcript content. It remains unclear how much jailbreak capability can arise from matched-text variation in speech delivery rather than from lexical rewriting or broader style transfer. We study this question by holding transcript content fixed and varying six speech-delivery presets whose acoustic attributes may co-vary. We present PJ-Break, a black-box evaluation protocol with presets targeting arousal, authority, and speaking rate, together with AdvAudio-Prosody, a 600-sample benchmark with acoustically verified attributes. On the exact post-QC Qwen2-Audio panel, the Q=1 Panic (38/95), Anger (35/95), and Fast (32/95) presets are all well above Neutral (4/95). The fixed six-query pool covers 44/95 Qwen2-Audio seeds and 15/95 GPT-4o seeds and exceeds a matched-budget StyleBreak reimplementation (27/95) on Qwen2-Audio. A same-voice pool excluding the confounded Commanding condition still reaches 40/95, and a retained-panel ablation shows emotional-delivery audio alone (44/95) is far more effective than emotional text alone (11/95). Exploratory surrogate diagnostics and pilot mitigation observations are secondary, non-core analyses. Overall, matched-text speech delivery should be treated as a first-class factor in Audio LLM safety evaluation