In recent years, credit card fraud detection has faced significant challenges due to highly imbalanced data, evolving fraud patterns, and complex relational structures among transaction entities. To address these issues, this research proposes a novel framework called Timeaware Multi Relational Guided Graph Neural Network (TMR GGNN). Particularly, the proposed TMR GGNN extends the encoder decoder Graph Neural Network GNN architecture by modeling heterogeneous interactions across customers, merchants, devices, and IPs over temporal windows. Subsequently, the proposed TMR GGNN approach constructs a dynamic, multi relational graph and incorporates a time aware relational attention mechanism within the encoder to adaptively weigh the transaction relevance based on temporal proximity and semantic context. Consequently, the decoder employs a contrastive learning module to distinguish between real and synthesized transaction patterns, while improving the models generalization of rare fraud cases. Additionally, to effectively manage severe class imbalances and emphasize discriminative learning, a composite loss function combining Information Noise Contrastive Estimation (InfoNCE) based contrastive loss with Focal Loss is introduced. This integration assists in improving fraud identification while mitigating false negatives.
Graph fraud detection plays a pivotal role in safeguarding the security and integrity of modern digital ecosystems. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are commonly adopted for graph fraud detection. However, the practical performance of existing GNN-based detectors is severely hindered by incomplete node attributes and extreme class imbalance within graphs. To mitigate these limitations, this paper proposes a novel framework for Graph Fraud Detection with Grouped attribute completion and Confidence-aware Contrastive learning, named GFD-GC. Specifically, it first imitates heterogeneous neighborhood structures to implement group-wise aggregation, which obtains informative complete node features by capturing fine-grained graph contextual patterns. Further, it introduces a confidence-aware supervised contrastive learning strategy to augment scarce labeled fraud nodes with high confidence pseudo-fraud nodes, which enhances the compactness of fraud representations and their separability from non-fraud nodes. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of the proposed GFD-GC over state-of-the-art baselines on the graph fraud detection task, thereby providing an effective solution for real-world fraud scenarios.
Graph-based fraud detection is essential for safeguarding large-scale transaction systems, where undetected anomalies may lead to substantial financial losses and security risks. Real-world fraud graphs pose two coupled challenges: sparse and imbalanced supervision, where verified fraudulent labels are scarce and heavily skewed toward benign accounts, and representation dilution, where spatial message passing may oversmooth camouflaged anomalies while spectral filters may suppress fraud-relevant mid- and high-frequency irregularities. To address these challenges, we propose ADC-GNN, short for Attention-guided Diffusion-Contrastive Graph Neural Network, a unified framework that combines diffusion-guided feature augmentation, contrastive representation learning, and multi-hop spectral attention for few-shot graph fraud detection. The diffusion component is formulated as a feature-space denoising augmentation mechanism rather than a full topology-generative graph diffusion model: it constructs noise-perturbed node-feature views under a cosine schedule and uses contrastive learning to stabilize node representations across perturbations. The spectral attention module further adaptively emphasizes fraud-relevant hop-level and relation-level cues. We evaluate ADC-GNN primarily on three public benchmarks and additionally report a proprietary real-world telecom transaction dataset with approximately 60,000 records as a private case study. Under the 1% training setting, ADC-GNN achieves consistent improvements over original graph fraud baselines and four protocol-consistent recent graph anomaly/fraud baselines on the public benchmarks. Additional analyses on split stability, training ratios, oversampling alternatives, module-level ablations, diffusion schedules, and runtime and memory-consumption comparisons further characterize the effective operating regime of ADC-GNN.
Credit-card fraud detection is difficult because fraudulent transactions are rare, costly, and unevenly distributed. Strong gradient-boosted tree models already perform well on structured transaction data, so the value of another fusion method is not obvious. This paper examines whether Combinatorial Fusion Analysis (CFA), which searches over model subsets and rank-score fusion rules, can still add value on the IEEE-CIS Fraud Detection benchmark. Using a leakage-free 60/20/20 train/validation/test protocol, we evaluate 480 fusion configurations built from seven base classifiers. The best test-set result comes from diversity-weighted score fusion of Random Forest, XGBoost, and LightGBM (DEF WtScore), with AUC-ROC = 0.9405, AUPRC = 0.6699, and F1 = 0.6373. Bootstrap confidence intervals from 1,000 resamples show that the gains over the strongest single model exclude zero for all three metrics. CFA matches soft voting on AUC-ROC, improves AUPRC and F1, and outperforms stacking in this setting. A CTGAN augmentation experiment gives a negative result: synthetic fraud samples degrade both individual models and CFA. Overall, CFA is most useful here not as a way to combine every classifier, but as a validation-stage method for choosing a small, complementary subset and assigning diversity-aware weights.