Organizations: Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
Abstract
An experimental investigation of neural image classification on the CIFAR-10 benchmark is presented through fully connected and convolutional network formulations. The analysis emphasizes the complete learning pipeline: image vectorization, normalization, one-hot class encoding, supervised loss minimization, learning-rate selection, mini-batch training, convolutional feature extraction, max-pooling, and validation-based generalization assessment. A convolutional architecture with six convolutional layers and three max-pooling stages is evaluated for ten training epochs using a batch size of 128 and an Adam optimizer with a learning rate of 0.001. The validation accuracy reaches approximately 74.77%, while the validation loss begins to increase after the middle of training despite continued reduction in training loss. The resulting behavior illustrates the practical difference between representation learning and memorization, and it provides a compact experimental baseline for future studies on regularization, data augmentation, deeper architectures, and reproducible image-classification education.
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) remain a central approach in image classification, but their performance depends strongly on architectural and training choices. This paper presents an empirical ablation-based study of CNN optimization for the CIFAR-10 benchmark. The study evaluates 17 progressive modifications involving training duration, learning-rate scheduling, dropout configuration, pooling strategy, network depth, filter arrangement, and dense-layer design. The goal is to identify which changes improve generalization and which increase complexity without improving performance. The baseline model achieved 79.5% test accuracy. Extending training duration improved performance steadily, whereas several structural redesigns reduced accuracy despite greater architectural variation. Based on the strongest individual configurations, a weighted ensemble was constructed, achieving 86.38% accuracy in the reduced-data setting and 89.23% when trained using the full CIFAR-10 dataset. These results suggest that performance gains in CNN-based classification depend less on indiscriminate increases in depth or parameter count than on careful empirical selection of training and architectural modifications. The study therefore highlights the practical value of ablation-oriented optimization and ensemble learning for small-image classification.
The feedback alignment (FA) algorithm offers a biologically plausible alternative to backpropagation (BP) for training neural networks yet notably fails to scale to convolutional architectures. Modifications have been proposed to address this limitation, but at questionable cost to biological plausibility. In this paper, we evaluate five learning algorithms including modified FA and standard BP, applied to the same convolutional architecture with the CIFAR-10 dataset. We provide a tripartite comparative analysis focusing on biological plausibility, interpretability, and computational complexity. Our results indicate that modified FA algorithms converge on internal representations that are structurally similar to those produced by backpropagation. In particular, it appears the functional success of modified FA algorithms may be rooted in their ability to mimic the representational geometry of backpropagation, converging on similar representations despite relying on fundamentally different weight update mechanisms.
Random initialization of convolutional filters does not use the training images. Previous work has shown that image patches can be copied into the first layer, and that k-means or principal components of patches can serve as filters. This paper compares four initializations of the first layer of a small convolutional network, with every other factor held fixed: He initialization, random mean-centered patches, principal components of those patches, and k-means centroids. Pre-Warm, our proposed methodology, is the rule-based use of both dictionaries: the patch count follows the filter count and a foreground density, both dictionaries are built from a single minibatch, and whichever of principal components or k-means better reconstructs those patches is written into the first half of the filter bank, rather than chosen by a validation search. The remaining filters stay random. On five datasets, principal components improve CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 relative to He initialization, and k-means improves SVHN and MNIST, and is the stronger of the two on Fashion-MNIST; copying raw patches does not reproduce those color-set gains. Use principal components on photographic patches and k-means on stroke-like patches; the first-batch reconstruction check recovers that split.