When AUC Misleads: Polarization-Aware Evaluation of Deepfake Detectors under Domain Shift

Deepfakes are artificially generated images, audio, or videos that threaten privacy, security, and information integrity. Detecting such content is crucial for countering disinformation, as the latest models generate highly realistic content. While spatial- or frequency-based approaches achieve good detection rates on Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs)-based generated deepfakes, they often struggle with recent diffusion model-generated images. In particular, existing approaches rarely exploit complementary multi-domain representations or systematically evaluate cross-generator robustness. To address these challenges, we propose a multi-domain deepfake detection framework called SGFF-Net (Spatial-Gradient-Frequency Fusion Network) that integrates spatial, gradient, and DWT (Discrete Wavelet Transform)-based frequency representations within a dual residual learning architecture. Experimental results show that the SGFF-Net achieves 98.95% accuracy in intra-dataset evaluation and improves performance in both cross-model (70.46%) and cross-paradigm (69.94%) settings. Incorporating multi-source training and data augmentation further enhances robustness, increasing accuracy from 70.46% to 79.80% in cross-model evaluation, from 69% to 78% in cross-paradigm evaluation, and from 61.50% to 75.80% on real-world data. Unlike single-domain detectors, the SGFF-Net learns complementary forensic cues across spatial, gradient, and wavelet-frequency domains, resulting in greater robustness under cross-generator and cross-paradigm evaluation. The results further show that combining multi-domain representations with data diversity and augmentation substantially improves generalization, providing practical insights for developing more reliable deepfake detection systems.

Nowadays, visual data forgery detection plays an increasingly important role in social and economic security with the rapid development of generative models. Existing face forgery detectors still can't achieve satisfactory performance because of poor generalization ability across datasets. The key factor that led to this phenomenon is the lack of suitable metrics: the commonly used cross-dataset AUC metric fails to reveal an important issue where detection scores may shift significantly across data domains. To explicitly evaluate cross-domain score comparability, we propose \textbf{Cross-AUC}, an evaluation metric that can compute AUC across dataset pairs by contrasting real samples from one dataset with fake samples from another (and vice versa). It is interesting to find that evaluating representative detectors under the Cross-AUC metric reveals substantial performance drops, exposing an overlooked robustness problem. Besides, we also propose the novel framework \textbf{S}emantic \textbf{F}ine-grained \textbf{A}lignment and \textbf{M}ixture-of-Experts (\textbf{SFAM}), consisting of a patch-level image-text alignment module that enhances CLIP's sensitivity to manipulation artifacts, and the facial region mixture-of-experts module, which routes features from different facial regions to specialized experts for region-aware forgery analysis. Extensive qualitative and quantitative experiments on the public datasets prove that the proposed method achieves superior performance compared with the state-of-the-art methods with various suitable metrics.

Deepfake detectors that achieve near-perfect scores on academic benchmarks collapse on real-world content: recent in-the-wild evaluations report AUC drops of 45-50% for state-of-the-art open-source models. We argue this gap is structural: static detectors are trained once against a moving generative frontier. We present BitMind Forensics (BMF), trained through Bittensor SN34, an open adversarial competition that continually refreshes the training distribution. We evaluate one dated export comprising image, general-video, and human-video checkpoints across nineteen public datasets: the canonical face-swap suites (FaceForensics++, Celeb-DF v1/v2/++, DFDC, DFD, UADFV, DF40) and recent in-the-wild and AI-generated-media benchmarks (Sumsub, Deepfake-Eval-2024, WildRF, Community Forensics, AIGCDetectBench, GenImage, AI-GenBench, AIGIBench, RAID, GenVidBench, GenVideo-100K). BMF reaches 0.936 AUC on Sumsub's original images and 0.872 pooled AUC over its full four-condition manipulation battery (1.4M images), staying robust under perturbation (0.855 JPEG, 0.799 downscaled), while GPEN enhancement improves detection (0.996). On Deepfake-Eval-2024, it matches the best commercial detector on images (0.915 vs 0.90) and exceeds it on video (0.822 vs 0.79), far above the best open-source detectors (0.56 and 0.63). It reaches 0.991 AUC on a 21-generator AI-image panel and 0.918 on GenVidBench, and exceeds the FF++-trained frontier on DFDC (0.947 vs 0.843) and Celeb-DF v2 (0.9985 vs 0.956), both contamination-audited, with statistical parity on Celeb-DF++. In a temporal study, successive dated exports improve on held-out media from generators absent from the static baseline's training (image 0.842 to 0.902; video 0.864 to 0.936). Our evaluation harness is public, and at publication the production API serves the exact evaluated snapshot for independent verification.