BatchGen: An Architecture for Scalable and Efficient Batch Inference

Mixed batching (MB)--interleaving prefill and decode in a single batch--has become the standard scheduling strategy for large language model (LLM) inference due to its efficiency in maximizing compute and memory utilization. However, through controlled experiments, we find that prefill-decode interference inflates MB's per-step marginal cost above that of pure decode. On the high-bandwidth H200 (4.8 TB/s), this occurs only when decode tokens exceed 80% of the batch; however, on the bandwidth-constrained RTX PRO 6000 (1.792 TB/s), this threshold plummets to just 20%. Consequently, the optimal choice between MB and exclusive batching (EB) fundamentally depends on GPU memory bandwidth, model size, and workload composition. We derive a closed-form condition for this EB-MB performance crossover, along with asymptotically optimal phase-switching thresholds and memory-safe batch sizing for EB. Optimized EB achieves up to 41.9% higher throughput on bandwidth-constrained GPUs, while MB retains its advantage on high-bandwidth hardware with larger models. Our hybrid scheduler EB+ applies this condition online to dynamically switch between EB and MB without manual intervention. Under non-stationary traffic with distribution or concurrency shifts, EB+ attains the highest or near-highest throughput in every setting, outperforming MB by up to 36.4%.

A main promise of looped language models (LMs) is depth-adaptive inference. By iterating a block of shared layers a variable number of times, the model can use less compute for "easy" tokens and more for "hard" ones. However, this adaptivity breaks standard batching: tokens in the same batch now require a different number of loops, so there is no unified forward pass, making efficient inference difficult. Standard inference frameworks like vLLM schedule on the token level and cannot handle this because tokens need to be removed from the batch within the forward pass. Loop-level scheduling has been proposed as a solution, but never implemented end to end. The key challenge is that looped architectures also contain non-looped boundary stages (e.g., token embedding and LM head) that must be scheduled at different frequencies than the loop. We introduce continuous depth batching (CDB), which schedules at the granularity of individual loop iterations. CDB handles boundary stages and loop steps in separate priority queues, makes exit decisions one step ahead, and overlaps all scheduling work with GPU computation. On Ouro 1.4B and Huginn 3.5B, CDB can realize up to $99\%$ of the theoretical maximum speed-up from adaptive-depth, translating to $1.5$-$1.9\times$ higher offline throughput and $45$-$90\%$ lower normalized latency under dynamic serving load.

Inference serving systems must balance throughput and latency under bursty, heterogeneous workloads, yet the industry standard remains static batching policies that require manual tuning and cannot adapt to shifting traffic. We investigate whether reinforcement learning (RL) can learn adaptive batching and routing policies that outperform these heuristics, training REINFORCE and PPO agents on a discrete-event simulator validated against queuing theory and production traces (Azure Functions, BurstGPT). We formulate the problem as an MDP over queue state, request type and GPU availability, evaluating across standard Poisson traffic, extreme bursts, real-world traces and heterogeneous multi-GPU routing. Our central finding is a clear boundary condition for RL's value in systems problems. In single-GPU settings, a well-tuned static batching policy is already near-optimal under Poisson-like arrivals and RL offers only marginal gains (+0.1% to +1.0%). In multi-GPU heterogeneous routing, however, where fast and slow requests compete for shared resources, the agent discovers a workload-segregation policy that eliminates Head-of-Line blocking, yielding a 3.5x (348%) improvement over Round-Robin and a 48% improvement over the strongest heuristic baseline (Shortest-Queue), with 60% higher throughput and 25% lower latency while respecting SLA constraints. The policy generalizes to unseen bursty and real-world traffic despite training only on synthetic Poisson arrivals and an attention-augmented policy network converges roughly 20% faster than an MLP baseline. These results suggest RL's advantage over engineered heuristics concentrates in combinatorial, multi-resource decisions rather than single-resource temporal scheduling, a practical distinction for deciding where learned policies justify their engineering cost in production inference infrastructure.