Progressive Alignment Objectives for Aligner-Encoder based ASR

Speech-to-text alignment means finding the temporal boundaries of each word in the audio. Some models provide such an alignment directly and others do not. Connectionist temporal classification (CTC) and transducer models have an alignment by construction, whereas attention-based encoder-decoders (AED) and speech large language models (LLMs) do not, and their word timings are usually read off the attention weights instead. All of these signals live on the encoder frame grid, which bounds their temporal precision. We study a generic gradient-based alignment that applies to any differentiable ASR model. We take the gradient of each teacher-forced token log probability with respect to the input, reduce it to a per-frame saliency, and decode the resulting matrix into word boundaries with a single dynamic-programming pass. The method needs no training, no model modification and no alignment heads, works across all model families including the speech LLMs, and aligns on the input grid rather than on the coarser encoder grid. We evaluate it on sixteen models from four families, on read (TIMIT) and spontaneous (Buckeye) speech, each against the model's own native or attention-based alignment. We find that the gradient yields a usable alignment for every model, that it is usually somewhat behind a strong native aligner but better where the native alignment is weak, as for the streaming models, and that its main disadvantage is the cost of one backward pass per token.

Modern learning systems represent perceptual signals with continuous vectors, but comparison, retrieval, memory, alignment, and reasoning are often naturally symbolic. In language, this interface is given by tokens; for speech and audio, it must be learned. Existing audio tokenizers use local quantization, clustering, or reconstruction, leaving sequence consistency, compactness, length control, termination, and edit geometry indirectly optimized. We introduce PairAlign, a framework for compact audio tokenization through sequence-level self-alignment. PairAlign treats tokenization as conditional sequence generation: an encoder maps speech to a condition, and an autoregressive decoder emits tokens from BOS to EOS, learning identity, order, length, and termination. Given two content-preserving views, each token string is trained to be likely under the other's representation, while unrelated examples provide competing sequences. This yields a surrogate for edit-distance preservation while discouraging collapse. Starting from a VQ tokenizer, PairAlign extends a frame-synchronous prior into an autoregressive tokenizer using VQ-derived and EMA-teacher targets, cross-paired teacher forcing, anti-bypass regularization, likelihood contrast, length control, and timing recovery. On 3 s speech, PairAlign learns compact token strings with strong cross-view consistency. In retrieval, it operates at 12.71 tokens/s and reduces archive tokens by 55% versus VQ while preserving edit-distance search. The results expose a compactness--locality trade-off: PairAlign does not aim to dominate dense geometric or SSL tokenizers on every local metric, but provides a lower-rate symbolic interface for comparison, retrieval, and analysis. More broadly, PairAlign is a sequence-symbolic analogue of JEPA-style predictive learning, predicting a learned variable-length symbolic sequence rather than a continuous latent.

We describe AlignAtt4LLM, an IWSLT 2026 simultaneous speech translation system for English to German, Italian, and Chinese. The system is a synchronous cascade: Qwen3-ASR with forced alignment produces an incrementally updated source transcript, and Gemma-4 E4B-it translates that prefix under an MT-side AlignAtt policy. To our knowledge, this is the first application of AlignAtt to a decoder-only LLM, where the encoder-decoder cross-attention used by earlier AlignAtt systems is absent. We recover a usable policy by proposing (1) an explicit source span in the prompt, (2) offline selection of translation-specific alignment heads, (3) selective qk-fast replay of the draft-to-source attention block, and (4) runtime query/key capture that preserves model outputs bit-identically. On the IWSLT 2026 development set, AlignAtt4LLM outperforms the supplied baselines for the European target languages, English to German and English to Italian, in both the low-latency regime around 2 seconds and the high-latency regime below 4 seconds CU-LongYAAL. Results for English to Chinese are more mixed, but the method is not tied to Gemma-4: because AlignAtt4LLM only requires a deterministic prompt layout, calibrated attention heads, and query/key capture, the same policy can be reapplied to stronger translation-focused decoder-only MT backbones for non-European target languages.